Results 1 to 25 of 239

Thread: Nvidia confirms GT-200 with 1 billion transistors

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    2,949
    Quote Originally Posted by DilTech View Post
    R600's formula didn't work because it couldn't USE the bandwidth. Too few rops, inefficient AA, too few tmus for AF... The rest of the architecture held it back.

    Also, you realize you'd need roughly 4ghz GDDR5 at 256bit to match 2ghz GDDR3 at 512bit, right? Also, GDDR3 is likely to be lower latency than GDDR5 as well.
    I think his point is that if the two options can provide the same bandwidth (256+GDDR5 vs 512+GDDR3) it's cheaper and way less complex to design and use the first. And I agree with that. I loved the R600 PCB's visual, but looking at it from a practical POV, 256+GDDR5 is better. Also, 512bits will force NVIDIA to use 16 chips in one PCB, just like the 2900XT. If they plan to do a GX2 with the GT-200, I just can't imagine the monster PCB (two of them more than likely) it'll be with 32 GDDR ICs, that huge chip and all the power circuitry.

    Of couse it'll be fast, but I don't want a second 2900XT talking about heat and power consumption.
    Last edited by STaRGaZeR; 04-11-2008 at 02:43 PM.
    Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)


    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR, on John Fruehe (JF-AMD) View Post
    Pretty much. Plus, he's here voluntarily.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •