Yelding as a patched b2 or unpatched b2?
Edit: Read in your DFI thread that it is patched. Of course it will yield about the same as a b2 as long as you disable the same parts of the L3
Yelding as a patched b2 or unpatched b2?
Edit: Read in your DFI thread that it is patched. Of course it will yield about the same as a b2 as long as you disable the same parts of the L3
Last edited by LIKMARK; 04-10-2008 at 10:40 PM.
Stability Update:-
Bad news but good news in a way too.
I had the last setting ~15 hours idling stable (meaning WISE stable) - until I went off, came back and tried opening this Google Book whilst scrolling up and down quickly, whilst zooming in/out: http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=T...=en#PPT1546,M1
It froze within 5 secs![]()
So I tested more and more idle stability by the same procedure because it worked very well and instant.. would my previously stable settings also fail that test?![]()
3010 x1/2900 x3 1.516v / 1.480v - idle failed and load stable
2947MHz 1.516v / 1.480v - idle failed and load stable
2928MHz 1.516v / 1.480v - idle failed and load stable
2914MHz 1.516v / 1.480v - idle failed and load stable
2909/2902MHz 1.516v / 1.480v - idle failed and load stable
2898MHz 1.516v / 1.480v - idle failed and load stable
2870MHz 1.516v / 1.480v - idle failed and load stable
2860MHz 1.516v / 1.480v - idle failed and load stable
2828MHz 1.516v / 1.480v - idle stable and load stable
See how much FAR below real stability was?![]()
The difference being, I was testing for instability, as in actively finding it.
All of those settings were UT3, Crysis, Memtest, EVEREST, Prime 95 stable BTW, but they obviously only test portions f the CPU.
I have not dropped volts yet, just changed speed settings before I can finally declare what is stable for daily use. I am very GLAD I've found a way to very quickly test the instability other procedures were not detecting, now I can finally map things out and move on instead of running around in nightmare circles. I skipped a region below 2860 to speeden things up, now I'll test in-between, as I find the stable setting, I'll then rigorously test it with dropping volts until I find the lowest. Before I needed 1.44v for 2860 stable, with this new test, who knows. This is what I'm currently at right now =>
You know, a search will always help you and me especially on something explained on every other Phenom thread page![]()
All you need to know is;
VID = not CPU volts, sets accessible voltage boundaries
VDDC = CPU volts
This seems weird, I'll wait to see the b/w numbers before I can comment but latency is a direct function of IMC speed in K10h. So you were testing DDR2-1000 5-3-3-9 2.7-3G NB?
It's expected because it's changing the same CPU performance registers as LIKMARK said
There is no one program to properly test Phenom stability, we have to rely on the known honesty of individuals.
The better way I see it is, make sure settings are benchable, Memtest stable, then boot into Windows and test stability in Everest > Prime 95 Small FFT > Gaming > Run that setup daily, open web-browser and start trying to open many tabs/sites incl. many programs from Start menu, and load THIS sites inside browser and start flicking through the pages as fast as you can whilst zooming in and out - don't reboot, keep it idling like 12-15 hours just to see - if its unstable, it'll fail pretty damn quickly. That link I'm giving above is a very good idling stability test for Phenom if you follow that procedure.![]()
Bookmarks