very big FAKE, my athlon 64 2600+ is NOT fake.
very big FAKE, my athlon 64 2600+ is NOT fake.
Still waiting...Originally Posted by KTE
Check your PM, I'll explain with evidence.
If you check out the thread he started in the bug reporting section of the ripping.org forums you'll see that he claimed stock cooling/1.35vI can't believe some people actually believed him, truely I can't...
Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!
Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v
Let him pass validating with the latest version of CPU-Z 1.44.1 Still no evidences.
4.2 ghz is a bit closely to truth.
Last edited by Data_; 02-22-2008 at 10:34 PM.
it is, but if you read earlier in the thread, kris has apparently said that it's a fake too
looks like my chip is still the only 65nm amd to have hit 4ghz? i find that hard to believe
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=266059
Got a fan over those memory sticks? No? Well get to it before you kill them
It's a system bug rather than fake.
There's many that should hit close but most don't try more than air. Pretty sure mine could've gone close, did 352xMHz at 1.4V stock HSF air. Needed more cooling, didn't have it then.looks like my chip is still the only 65nm amd to have hit 4ghz? i find that hard to believe
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=266059
Heh, I will put my 9850e up against your E2140 any day in any application.
Haha, I love it! People like this make my days more fun. Seeing title, not reading what have been said at least in the previous 2 posts and posts the comment of the day. I love it, lol.wow............it's the highest oc to amd cpu i saw !
kewl and great news !
DFI Lanparty DK P55-T3eH9
DFI UT X58//DK P45-T2RS Pluss/ MI P55/ BI 785G
E8600/ i7 920/ i7 860
G.Skill Ripjaw 2000MHz cl9 2x2GB
Corsair 3x1GB 1600MHz cl7
OCZ Flex XLC 9200 2x1GB @1200MHz
ATI 4850//Corsair HX1000W/
When everything goes wrong: HP TX2590eo
Missing you KTE...
heheh i missed your little "dig" hereHeh, I will put my 9850e up against your E2140 any day in any application.
you know what i mean
extreme cooling etc
anyways Ph2 is coming out and in the benchroom about to get frozen on sunday so clearly i've moved on and found something useful in AMD to play with hehe
I don't really understand how my method works. Must say.
I'd say do it, then CPU-Z will read this strange core speed.
.cvf files are not always validated but some go thru. No matter the 1.4... aso 1.48 versions.
Question is : CPU-Z calculation wrong ( refresh rate maybe ) or real instant core speed ? Some programs are able to change FSB instantly from OS to system. If the rate is not fast enough which process is prior ? Time to gather the various pole points or time for the PLL to compensate ?
I did not intend to annoy the fame of the sub-zero ways to reach high Core Speeds.
This is only overclocking. This is not science.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks