::|:: Q9300 & Q9450 C1 OEM ::|::
Click the thumbnail to view full-size image
Code:M/B:Asus P5K = Vmod Vcore , Vdroop , Vddr , Vmch & Vfsbvtt/RefGtl (not Vpll) CPU:Intel Q9300 C1 Q803B186 & Q9450 C1 CPU cooling: Thermalright 120 Extreme & Caskade 2 stages R507/R1150 (-107/-109°) Memory: STT Pc5300 Hynix VGA:Sapphire X1900XT & Zotac 8800GTS HDD: Hitachi 250go 8mo Sata Power Supply:OCZ ProXstream 1000w OS:Windows XP PNX & 2K3
With the Learn/jp mod's Vfsbvtt/RefGTL (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...9&postcount=55) , The Q9xx0 Quad gain advantage in fsb max![]()
For Exemple :
Q9450 on Aircooling :
Vfsbvtt/VGtlRef with Vnb at 1.79v :
1.5v Bios = Max 475mhz
1.55v réel = Max 483mhz
1.65v réel = Max 487mhz
Q9300 on Aircooling :
Vfsbvtt/VGtlRef with Vnb at 1.79v :
1.5v Bios = Max 478mhz
1.8v réel = Max 493mhz
I believe that up the Vnb and Vfsbvtt help have a better fsb on Q9xx0 (but I saw no gain on the E8x00 is even worse in aircooling)![]()
Intel Q9450 C1 sous cascade (-108° évapo) , not cold boot
Vcore : 1.6v
Vpll : 1.72v
Vnb : 1.78v
Vfsbvtt/VGtlRef : 1.9v réel
Vfsbvtt/VGtlRef : 1.5v bios = max 500mhz of fsb
Max Screen Cpuz (don't valid at 520mhz)
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=330444
Intel Q9300 C1 under cascade (-109° évapo) , cold boot at -70°
Vcore : 1.6v
Vpll : 1.72v
Vnb : 2.05v![]()
Vfsbvtt/VGtlRef : 2.15v réel![]()
Vfsbvtt/VGtlRef : 1.8v réel = max 513mhz of fsb
Max Screen Cpuz (don't valid at 524mhz)![]()
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=337819
![]()














Reply With Quote








Bookmarks