View Poll Results: Do you consider your intel 45nm CPU (wolfdale E8x00) to be Degraded

Voters
280. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, after supplying 1.300v - 1.349v to the vcore

    12 4.29%
  • Yes, after supplying 1.350v - 1.399v to the vcore

    14 5.00%
  • Yes, after supplying 1.400v - 1.449v to the vcore

    26 9.29%
  • Yes, after supplying 1.450v - 1.499v to the vcore

    23 8.21%
  • Yes, after supplying 1.500v - 1.599v to the vcore

    15 5.36%
  • Yes, after supplying 1.600v or more to the vcore

    26 9.29%
  • No, and I run my vcore at 1.300v - 1.349v 24/7

    49 17.50%
  • No, and I run my vcore at 1.350v - 1.399v 24/7

    49 17.50%
  • No, and I run my vcore at 1.400v - 1.449v 24/7

    33 11.79%
  • No, and I run my vcore at 1.450v or more 24/7

    33 11.79%
Results 1 to 25 of 403

Thread: E8400/8500 degradation myth possibly busted?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    750
    Quote Originally Posted by CrazyNutz View Post
    Nope, It's 100% stock. 0 mods
    That is hella weird. And I am having another theory:

    It might not be that the spikes are degrading the chip... it might be that... the spikes are causing unstable moments, thus making it look like your CPU is failing, whereas it's actually stable! From my own experience, smooth graphs would be very stable, and those with slight distortions are more subject to instablity... even when the vCore is enough, a slight movement in 12V rail would cause the test to fail immediately.
    Motherboard: ASUS P5Q
    CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 3.20GHz (1.07v vCore! )
    RAM: 2GB Kingston HyperX 800MHz
    GPU: MSI Radeon HD 4870 @ 780/1000 (default)

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    1,787
    Quote Originally Posted by RunawayPrisoner View Post
    That is hella weird. And I am having another theory:

    It might not be that the spikes are degrading the chip... it might be that... the spikes are causing unstable moments, thus making it look like your CPU is failing, whereas it's actually stable! From my own experience, smooth graphs would be very stable, and those with slight distortions are more subject to instablity... even when the vCore is enough, a slight movement in 12V rail would cause the test to fail immediately.
    Could be, however even with that huge spike/s, OCCT still ran a "Stable" test.

    I would bet these spikes are occurring a lot more than what the graphs are showing. I'm going to try to barrow a oscilloscope so I can see the actual
    frequency they are happening.
    Sandy Bridge 2500k @ 4.5ghz 1.28v | MSI p67a-gd65 B3 Mobo | Samsung ddr3 8gb |
    Swiftech apogee drive II | Coolgate 120| GTX660ti w/heat killer gpu x| Seasonic x650 PSU

    QX9650 @ 4ghz | P5K-E/WIFI-AP Mobo | Hyperx ddr2 1066 4gb | EVGA GTX560ti 448 core FTW @ 900mhz | OCZ 700w Modular PSU |
    DD MC-TDX CPU block | DD Maze5 GPU block | Black Ice Xtreme II 240 Rad | Laing D5 Pump

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •