MMM
Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Is the X48 65nm?

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    211

    Is the X48 65nm?

    I have seen rumors that the X48 is a die shrunk X38 (65nm), can anyone prove or disprove this myth? Preferably with a source?
    Q6600 G0 - 4870 512MB - 4GB DDR3-1600 - GA-EP45-DS3R - 2 x 7200.10 RAID 0 - OP650

  2. #2
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Oxford, UK
    Posts
    747
    On a slightly related note, what process is the X38 made on? I see people running 1.6-1.8v without any apparent worries so it makes me wonder.
    || 2500K @ 5GHz 1 thread, 4.8 2 threads, 4.7 3, 4.6 4 1.284V ||
    || P8P67-M Pro || 8GB @ 2133MHz ||
    || 5850 @ 1000/1225 || XFX 650W || Silverstone FT03B ||
    || 37" LCD TV || CM Hyper 212+ || Samsung 2.1 Soundbar ||

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    211
    90nm I believe.
    Q6600 G0 - 4870 512MB - 4GB DDR3-1600 - GA-EP45-DS3R - 2 x 7200.10 RAID 0 - OP650

  4. #4
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Oxford, UK
    Posts
    747
    Just did some googling and got some other forums where various people were claiming them to be nothing more than speedbinned X38 chips....but just found this where it says the 4-series chipsets are all 65nm?

    http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2008/03..._g45_and_x48/1

    That's not the only process that Intel is pushing though, because the entire 4-series range is now built on 65nm technology, as opposed to 90nm with the 3-series. So it turns out that X48 will be different to X38 after all...
    || 2500K @ 5GHz 1 thread, 4.8 2 threads, 4.7 3, 4.6 4 1.284V ||
    || P8P67-M Pro || 8GB @ 2133MHz ||
    || 5850 @ 1000/1225 || XFX 650W || Silverstone FT03B ||
    || 37" LCD TV || CM Hyper 212+ || Samsung 2.1 Soundbar ||

  5. #5
    I am Xtreme zanzabar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    SF bay area, CA
    Posts
    15,871
    that says that the p/g45/43 are 65nm the x48 is a 90nm

    this bit tech article says that its 90nm and if it were 65nm dont u think that intel would be pushing that even though a die shrink would raise the temp and lower the voltage to far below the ram and the cpu so it wouldent make sense on a north ridge
    http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/200...pset_preview/1


    i see that your article is more recent but i cant see it happening, this would make the x48 cheaper and have less overclockability and performance
    5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
    samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi

  6. #6
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    2,542
    I know new G45 and G45 HD are 65nm, but if X48 is still 90nm, in my head that will ring the same alarm as Nvidia releasing the "new" 9800GTX...

  7. #7
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    2,949
    You know what X38 is, right? X48 is the same, higher binned with a new name.
    Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)


    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR, on John Fruehe (JF-AMD) View Post
    Pretty much. Plus, he's here voluntarily.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Grinchville Embassy; Santa Cruz, Aruba
    Posts
    599
    so whats the 780i then, 90nm?





    Q9450 @3.60 Ghz, Striker II Formula, Evga 9800GTX (863/2050/1200), 2X2gb 1100 5,5,5,18 D9's at 2.20V
    Cooled by: MCR320, D-Tek Fuzion V2, MCP335 w/ EK G3/8 TOPS, Full BP high flow 1/2" fittings
    Oh and Vista Ultimate (i know, I KNOW!)

  9. #9
    I am Xtreme zanzabar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    SF bay area, CA
    Posts
    15,871
    i cant tell u off hand but i think that its a 65nm by the temps that it has
    5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
    samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi

  10. #10
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ace Deuce, Michigan
    Posts
    3,955
    790i is supposed to be 65nm from what I recall (besides as zanzabar said, the temps are drasticly lower than 680i's)
    Quote Originally Posted by Hans de Vries View Post

    JF-AMD posting: IPC increases!!!!!!! How many times did I tell you!!!

    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    .....}
    until (interrupt by Movieman)


    Regards, Hans

  11. #11
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    2,949
    Quote Originally Posted by Anandtech
    Both the 790i SLI SPP and MCP are built using relatively outdated 90nm process technology. Like Intel's latest chipsets, they are long overdue for a shrink to 65nm.
    790i is 90nm.

    P965, P35, X38 and X48 are 90nm.

    P45 will be the first chipset using 65nm.
    Last edited by STaRGaZeR; 03-25-2008 at 02:47 PM.
    Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)


    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR, on John Fruehe (JF-AMD) View Post
    Pretty much. Plus, he's here voluntarily.

  12. #12
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    211
    Well it seems like no one really knows. People may say that they know, but it differs with another person who thinks they know.

    We need to get an official word on this one.
    Q6600 G0 - 4870 512MB - 4GB DDR3-1600 - GA-EP45-DS3R - 2 x 7200.10 RAID 0 - OP650

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    41
    Well since the ASUS Maximus Formula is able to be flashed to the Rampage bios, I would think the X38 and X48 chipset is the same, along with the rest of the board's layouts. If the X48 was a 65nm chipset, I dont think this would be remotely possible.

    Just my 2 cents...

    edit: Well I felt like taking a huge chance tonight by flashing my P5E to the Rampage bios. It was actually a painless procedure that took about 5 min! So I can say that my P5E is now running the X48 Ramapge bios without issue.

    I found it strange that CPU-Z and Everest both detect the board as the P5E, but the bios is detected correctly with the 0219 Rampage bios string:



    I did have to disable some of the temp sensor features to keep warning messages from posting about the non-existent sensors making false readings. But the other temps like CPU and MB temps are still working correctly.
    Last edited by EOD; 03-26-2008 at 01:11 AM.
    i7 980X @ 4.0GHz at 1.26v
    Rampage III extreme 602 bios
    ASUS 5970 + ASUS 5850
    3x2GB G.Skill Trident: 1611 6-7-6-18 1T
    Intel X-25m 80Gb G2 RAID 0 w 1.5Gb and 1Gb HDD
    Cooler Master 850W
    Windows 7 64 Ultimate

  14. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Portishead, Bristol, England
    Posts
    3,248
    X38 & X48 are the same so for the love of god shut ya ing

    X*8 is 90NM

    P45 is going to be 65nm

    Happy now, good topic can be clossed

  15. #15
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    2,949
    Quote Originally Posted by STaRGaZeR View Post
    790i is 90nm.

    P965, P35, X38 and X48 are 90nm.

    P45 will be the first chipset using 65nm.
    Just FYI...
    Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)


    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR, on John Fruehe (JF-AMD) View Post
    Pretty much. Plus, he's here voluntarily.

  16. #16
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Canaduh
    Posts
    731
    Quote Originally Posted by EOD View Post
    Well since the ASUS Maximus Formula is able to be flashed to the Rampage bios, I would think the X38 and X48 chipset is the same, along with the rest of the board's layouts. If the X48 was a 65nm chipset, I dont think this would be remotely possible.

    Just my 2 cents...

    edit: Well I felt like taking a huge chance tonight by flashing my P5E to the Rampage bios. It was actually a painless procedure that took about 5 min! So I can say that my P5E is now running the X48 Ramapge bios without issue.

    I found it strange that CPU-Z and Everest both detect the board as the P5E, but the bios is detected correctly with the 0219 Rampage bios string:

    I did have to disable some of the temp sensor features to keep warning messages from posting about the non-existent sensors making false readings. But the other temps like CPU and MB temps are still working correctly.
    get cpu-z 1.44.1 and everest 4.30 and they'll both display your board as a rampage formula
    Intel i7 980x / 3001B331
    HK3.0+LaingDDCPRO+XSPCRX360+1xMCR220
    EVGA Classified X58+EK FB
    6GB Corsair Dominator GT 1866 7-8-7-20(TR3X6G1866C7GT)
    ASUS GTX580
    Enermax Revolution+85 950w
    Corsair Obsidian






Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •