new HD x264 video encoding benchmark

[G H Z]

Here's one of my rigs.

[dkx64]

Q6600
Vista x64
x38 chipset
5-5-5-15 SPD

@3.33GHz

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 66.50 fps, 3904.67 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 66.19 fps, 3904.67 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 67.14 fps, 3904.67 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 67.18 fps, 3904.67 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 18.55 fps, 3952.97 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 18.46 fps, 3952.97 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 18.47 fps, 3952.97 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 18.80 fps, 3952.97 kb/s

@3.60GHz

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 71.49 fps, 3905.42 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 72.03 fps, 3905.42 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 71.66 fps, 3905.42 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 56.30 fps, 3905.42 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.22 fps, 3952.85 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.27 fps, 3952.85 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.30 fps, 3952.85 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.25 fps, 3952.85 kb/s

I was loading another program during run4pass1, thats why it dropped to 56
It looks like Vista is indeed slower than XP reading these results.

[Gen]

It looks like Vista is indeed slower than XP reading these results.

+1, by looking at all the Q6600's @3.6 XP looks to be 3-4fps faster.

i rebenched with firewall, a/v, some processes and everest all disabled and still, with Vista x64, got the same fps.

[graysky]

+1, by looking at all the Q6600's @3.6 XP looks to be 3-4fps faster.

i rebenched with firewall, a/v, some processes and everest all disabled and still, with Vista x64, got the same fps.

Yeah, vista is pretty, but man is it bloaty too. My XP system boots up with about 200 megs of the SF used. The same system under Vista boots up with 800 megs!