Case-Coolermaster Cosmos S
MoBo- ASUS Crosshair IV
Graphics Card-XFX R9 280X [out for RMA] using HD5870
Hard Drive-Kingston 240Gig V300 master Seagate 160Gb slave Seagate 250Gb slave Seagate 500Gb slave Western Digital 500Gb
CPU-AMD FX-8320 5Ghz
RAM 8Gig Corshair c8
Logitech 5.1 Z5500 BOOST22
300Gb of MUSICA!!
Steam ID: alphamonkeywoman
http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/933ab/
Well specs are not everything you know. Look at the 9600. These cards will probably surprise everyone.
Well, they sure surprised many with the sneaky "overclocking-via-the-PCIe-bus-without-reflecting-it-in-drivers-or-tools"-function it incorporated which caused many review cards to be unstable and fail even simple overclocks (since they were already overclocked by 10-15% depending on the current PCIe-clock). In essense they're shrunk, overclocked and very slightly tweaked 8600GTS's (or practically half a G92 8800GTS). If they hadn't cheated with that PCIe-bus clock trick the 9600GT would be a compelling mid-range card right below the 8800GT. As it is it feels shoddy to me. In fact, the whole 9-series feels kind of unnecessary since they're essentially G92's. They should've used a different nomenclature like 8900GT/GTS/GTX or something, not jumped to series-9 because they're not a generation ahead, just slight updates (shrinks, higher clocks) of G92's.
ASUS Sabretooth P67.B3
Core i5 2500K 4900MHz stable/4500 Daily use
Fractal Design R3 with Corsair TX 650W PSU
G.Skill ARES LP 1600 @ 1866
MSI Radeon 7950 @ 1150/1600
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB FW 1.5
Bookmarks