MMM
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 72

Thread: Is Nvidia having trouble acquiring a Intel Common Serial Interface License?

  1. #1
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    4,811

    Is Nvidia having trouble acquiring a Intel Common Serial Interface License?

    If rumours about Nvidia’s inability to get a license to produce Intel Common Serial Interface (CSI) bus compatible chipsets are correct, its multi-GPU technology SLI may either disappear from the market or Nvidia may change its SLI licensing policy and open up the technology for others.

    At present Nvidia SLI multi-GPU systems may feature two, three or even four graphics processing units (GPUs) by Nvidia Corp. to speed up graphics rendering speed in games. One substantial peculiarity of Nvidia SLI multi-GPU technology is that several graphics cards have to be installed on a mainboard that is based on Nvidia nForce SLI core-logic.

    Even though two graphics cards may technically function on any mainboard with any chipset provided that there are several PCI Express x16 slots, Nvidia does not allow system logic sets developed by companies like Advanced Micro Devices or Intel Corp. to power multi-GPU systems carrying two or more Nvidia GeForce-based add-in-cards. In order to enable SLI technology for its Intel Dual Socket Extreme Desktop Platform (DSEDP) Intel had to install certain PCI Express hub chips from Nvidia onto its Intel Desktop Board D5400XS mainboard. By contrast, ATI CrossFire and CrossFire X multi-GPU technologies that allow several ATI Radeon graphics cards to work in cooperation can be enabled on any third-party chipset, but not Nvidia’s (due to prohibition of Nvidia)...

    According to a news-story by The Inquirer web-site, Intel “is refusing to provide Nvidia with a vital piece of CSI technology”, which may indicate that Nvidia loses ability to produce Intel-compatible chipsets late in 2008, which may be a huge blow to Nvidia’s chipset business division.

    With no in-house developed Intel-compatible chipsets, Nvidia will have to either allow SLI technology to function on third-party chipsets, or its multi-GPU technology will only function on chipsets supporting microprocessors by AMD, which currently cannot offer the same level of performance as Intel’s CPUs and are usually not gamers’ processors of choice. As a consequence, Nvidia SLI multi-GPU platform may find itself unpopular or may even cease to exist. On the other hand, even if Nvidia fails to get CSI license at any cost, the company may focus on creating graphics cards with several GPUs on them, which do not require any special chipsets.

    Source
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  2. #2
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Ankara Turkey
    Posts
    2,631
    amd give money to control ati's moves but intel is trying to use its power instead of money to control nvidia


    When i'm being paid i always do my job through.

  3. #3
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    4,743
    This is the same thing intel did to via to get it's way, but in this case I'm for it. I don't want to have to use a Nvidia chipset just for SLI.


    Asus Z9PE-D8 WS with 64GB of registered ECC ram.|Dell 30" LCD 3008wfp:7970 video card

    LSI series raid controller
    SSDs: Crucial C300 256GB
    Standard drives: Seagate ST32000641AS & WD 1TB black
    OSes: Linux and Windows x64

  4. #4
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    City of Lights, The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,381
    Quote Originally Posted by safan80 View Post
    This is the same thing intel did to via to get it's way, but in this case I'm for it. I don't want to have to use a Nvidia chipset just for SLI.
    I do agree with that last part yeah, although I won't believe this until I see it....

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Rockford IL. US
    Posts
    172
    All I can say is "Good" Intel stick it to them and lets see if they ( Nvidia ) open's up SLI on all MB's not likely but "Good". Now AMD do the same that put Nvidia in a pinch.

  6. #6
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Carleton University, Canada
    Posts
    176
    So if Intel gets nVidia to surrender its hold on SLI, would this allow for some older Intel chipsets to use SLI? I would like SLI on my P35
    "TV and the internet are good because they keep stupid people form spending too much time out in public."
    -jPod, by Douglas Coupland

    "There is no Todd"
    -Dilbert, by Scott Adams

  7. #7
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    2,588
    Quote Originally Posted by ABXG View Post
    So if Intel gets nVidia to surrender its hold on SLI, would this allow for some older Intel chipsets to use SLI? I would like SLI on my P35
    yeah I would imagine so..

  8. #8
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    983
    I simply cannot understand nvidia holding out on intel. If SLI were available on intel chipset motherboards they would sell more video cards. Yes. The motherboards would take a hit but i think selling more video cards would make them more money in the long run.

    Look at AMD. They allow intel to run crossfire.
    i5 2500K @ 4.7ghz 1.32v(+.010 offset LLC set to 4) / ASRock P67 Extreme4 (B3) / 2x4gb Samsung Green MV-3V4G3D @ 1866mhz 1.35v / AMD HD 6850 1gb /2x150gb Velociraptor Raid 0 + 500gb WD Green / Corsair TX 750watt V2

  9. #9
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    983
    Quote Originally Posted by ABXG View Post
    So if Intel gets nVidia to surrender its hold on SLI, would this allow for some older Intel chipsets to use SLI? I would like SLI on my P35
    No. It's at the hardware level. Skulltrail has SLI capability only because of special chips from nvidia(nforce 100). Existing P35/X38 motherboards do not have these chips so no. You will never see SLI on your P35/X38 based motherboard.
    i5 2500K @ 4.7ghz 1.32v(+.010 offset LLC set to 4) / ASRock P67 Extreme4 (B3) / 2x4gb Samsung Green MV-3V4G3D @ 1866mhz 1.35v / AMD HD 6850 1gb /2x150gb Velociraptor Raid 0 + 500gb WD Green / Corsair TX 750watt V2

  10. #10
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Toon
    Posts
    1,570
    Nvidia loses ability to produce Intel-compatible chipsets late in 2008, which may be a huge blow to Nvidia’s chipset business division.
    I thought they already had, 650i (wont boot with E8400) & 680i (not stable over ~1250MHz) are terrible at dealling with 45nm chips, 780i isn't much better. 750i ASUS P5ND seems to be the best nVidia board out at the moment. Apart from SLi and the now ageing 8800 series and Physx and a killer midrange card what have they got?
    Intel i7 920 C0 @ 3.67GHz
    ASUS 6T Deluxe
    Powercolor 7970 @ 1050/1475
    12GB GSkill Ripjaws
    Antec 850W TruePower Quattro
    50" Full HD PDP
    Red Cosmos 1000

  11. #11
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,550
    so xbit decided to folow the ways of some well established yellow e-pages... rumours are the only thing that's lefto for today e-IT-news sites for spining the couters...
    Adobe is working on Flash Player support for 64-bit platforms as part of our ongoing commitment to the cross-platform compatibility of Flash Player. We expect to provide native support for 64-bit platforms in an upcoming release of Flash Player following the release of Flash Player 10.1.

  12. #12
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    2,144
    Quote Originally Posted by GripS View Post
    I simply cannot understand nvidia holding out on intel. If SLI were available on intel chipset motherboards they would sell more video cards. Yes. The motherboards would take a hit but i think selling more video cards would make them more money in the long run.

    Look at AMD. They allow intel to run crossfire.
    Intel ran crossfire before AMD was even in the picture.... since the 955X and 945P chipsets.
    |-------Conner-------|



    RIP JimmyMoonDog

    2,147,222 F@H Points - My F@H Statistics:
    http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/...e=Conman%5F530

  13. #13
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    895
    Quote Originally Posted by GripS View Post
    No. It's at the hardware level. Skulltrail has SLI capability only because of special chips from nvidia(nforce 100). Existing P35/X38 motherboards do not have these chips so no. You will never see SLI on your P35/X38 based motherboard.
    the only thing stopping SLI on intel chipsets is the drivers. not hardware. hacked drivers way back when would allow it to work and actually worked better on intel chipsets.
    Quote Originally Posted by charlie View Post
    honestly there are some really stupid people here. I mean stupid as in low IQ and fantastic imaginations with little deductive reasoning.

  14. #14
    Coat It with GOOOO
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,608
    Quote Originally Posted by zabomb4163 View Post
    the only thing stopping SLI on intel chipsets is the drivers. not hardware. hacked drivers way back when would allow it to work and actually worked better on intel chipsets.
    yup, all the bridge chips do is split 16 pcie 2.0's into 32 pcie 1.0's.

    and on topic, I would be glad to see this happen.

    A prost to making Nvidia sweat.
    Last edited by Blauhung; 02-22-2008 at 08:17 PM.
    Main-- i7-980x @ 4.5GHZ | Asus P6X58D-E | HD5850 @ 950core 1250mem | 2x160GB intel x25-m G2's |
    Wife-- i7-860 @ 3.5GHz | Gigabyte P55M-UD4 | HD5770 | 80GB Intel x25-m |
    HTPC1-- Q9450 | Asus P5E-VM | HD3450 | 1TB storage
    HTPC2-- QX9750 | Asus P5E-VM | 1TB storage |
    Car-- T7400 | Kontron mini-ITX board | 80GB Intel x25-m | Azunetech X-meridian for sound |


  15. #15
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    HD0
    Posts
    2,646
    Quote Originally Posted by GripS View Post
    No. It's at the hardware level. Skulltrail has SLI capability only because of special chips from nvidia(nforce 100). Existing P35/X38 motherboards do not have these chips so no. You will never see SLI on your P35/X38 based motherboard.
    no, it's a software thing, SLI is blocked in drivers, not the hardware.

    FYI hacked drivers= SLI on P35 .

  16. #16
    The Doctor Warboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    2,597
    Quote Originally Posted by xlink View Post
    no, it's a software thing, SLI is blocked in drivers, not the hardware.

    FYI hacked drivers= SLI on P35 .
    Hacked Drivers for the X38 would be better.
    My Rig can do EpicFLOPs, Can yours?
    Once this baby hits 88 TeraFLOPs, You're going to see some serious $@#%....

    Build XT7 is currently active.
    Current OS Systems: Windows 10 64bit

  17. #17
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    HD0
    Posts
    2,646
    Quote Originally Posted by [cTx]Warboy View Post
    Hacked Drivers for the X38 would be better.
    well duh you'de have raped PCI bandwidth due to the 4x slot.

    from my understanding though hacked drivers = it works for any board

    though with the cost of the 8800s/9600s and with the hacked drivers out only working for GF7 ad under... well it's not really worth it to not just go with the latest and greatest.

  18. #18
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,462
    seems like I'm not the only one to say: haaahaaaaa
    Notice any grammar or spelling mistakes? Feel free to correct me! Thanks

  19. #19
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    178
    Quote Originally Posted by GripS View Post
    No. It's at the hardware level. Skulltrail has SLI capability only because of special chips from nvidia(nforce 100). Existing P35/X38 motherboards do not have these chips so no. You will never see SLI on your P35/X38 based motherboard.
    you must be confused. if nvidia gives intel the license, then those special chips aren't required anymore as nvidia will include intel chipsets on the "allowed" chipset list.


    Abit AV8 - AMD64 3000+ 1Ghz@1.025V - 512MB Hynix D43 - R9200SE 128MB - Liteon IDE burner - WD 250GB IDE

  20. #20
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    At work
    Posts
    1,369
    So NVidia is finally getting their just desserts...good. I hope Intel really bends them over hard and demands huge money and SLI interoperability on Intel chipsets for a license...NVidia was more than willing to do it to us and to Intel when it came to SLI, forcing the use of their inferior chipsets on us. Even now, with the use of the NForce 100 bridge chips on Skulltrail, NVidia is arrogantly not allowing the use of more than 2 graphics cards in SLI on a board that clearly supports it.

    What goes around comes around...NVidia will learn that you don't whiz on the leg of the big dog and expect him to help you out in the future. NVidia is very lucky Intel didn't just decide to swallow them whole...
    Server: HP Proliant ML370 G6, 2x Xeon X5690, 144GB ECC Registered, 8x OCZ Vertex 3 MAX IOPS 240GB on LSi 9265-8i (RAID 0), 12x Seagate Constellation ES.2 3TB SAS on LSi 9280-24i4e (RAID 6) and dual 1200W redundant power supplies.
    Gamer: Intel Core i7 6950X@4.2GHz, Rampage Edition 10, 128GB (8x16GB) Corsair Dominator Platinum 2800MHz, 2x NVidia Titan X (Pascal), Corsair H110i, Vengeance C70 w/Corsair AX1500i, Intel P3700 2TB (boot), Samsung SM961 1TB (Games), 2x Samsung PM1725 6.4TB (11.64TB usable) Windows Software RAID 0 (local storage).
    Beater: Xeon E5-1680 V3, NCase M1, ASRock X99-iTX/ac, 2x32GB Crucial 2400MHz RDIMMs, eVGA Titan X (Maxwell), Samsung 950 Pro 512GB, Corsair SF600, Asetek 92mm AIO water cooler.
    Server/workstation: 2x Xeon E5-2687W V2, Asus Z9PE-D8, 256GB 1866MHz Samsung LRDIMMs (8x32GB), eVGA Titan X (Maxwell), 2x Intel S3610 1.6TB SSD, Corsair AX1500i, Chenbro SR10769, Intel P3700 2TB.

    Thanks for the help (or lack thereof) in resolving my P3700 issue, FUGGER...

  21. #21
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    1,838
    Seems abit stupid them both fighting with each other over this. They could both gain huge amounts from cooperating.

    Intel chipsets with SLI capabilities would no doubt massively boost nvidia GPU sales. Forcing us to buy nVidias crap attempt at a chipset just for SLI really isnt doing them any good at all, they were doing fine without it before the 680i chipset.

    They simply need to allow Intel to have SLI on their chipsets, so what if nvidia lost sales on its own chipset, they could still make their own chipset providing they did a decent job of it unlike their current crappy offerings.

    nVidia will have to buckle i feel. Its either they allow Intel to have SLI capabilities on their chipset or they wont be able to use their GPUs in conjunction with Intels highend CPUs. Meaning Nvidia will have to make cards for budget systems which i really cant see them wanting to do as they would lose billions in profit.

  22. #22
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    near Boston, MA, USA
    Posts
    1,955
    Nvidia deserves this several times over. SLI should not be limited to their chipset alone (Skulltrail doesn't really count).

    Both companies would do well to cooperate, but Nvidia through the first stone. Now they are just basically going to have to realize what an idiotic business move that was.

    Even funnier is the likely fact that Nvidia should have offered SLI when they had the chance. When Intel starts making GPU's, and probably will have a version of SLI itself, I'd bet they won't even need Nvidia's SLI. And at that point Intel is probably going to grind the screws harder, cutting off Nvidia at every turn not giving them anything to let Nvidia's chipsets work with Intel products. Then Nvidia will realize (too late) that they have nothing to trade (that Intel wants) and everything to lose as they can no longer make a chipset that works with Intel products. They made a short term decision that will really kill off their business in the long run. And, in fact, now that Intel is officially pissed off at them, it's probably too late as Intel is likely more happy to kill them off than to deal at this point.

    Whoever made this choice at Nvidia wasn't worth their MBA, that's for sure.

  23. #23
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    *wait for NV to play the "scream monopoly card" against intel*

  24. #24
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Bancroft, ON, Canada
    Posts
    3,645
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    *wait for NV to play the "scream monopoly card" against intel*
    Since NV's purpose would be to lock out competition on SLI, they don't have a leg to stand on. Intel's lawyers aren't stupid.
    "Foldin, Foldin, Foldin...keep those benchers foldin..." (Lyrics by Angra, Music is Rawhide)

    BOYCOTT MIR's

    Quote Originally Posted by Monkeywoman View Post
    aww an OC virgin! lose it tonight with Xtremesystems!!!

  25. #25
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    758
    Quote Originally Posted by GripS View Post
    No. It's at the hardware level. Skulltrail has SLI capability only because of special chips from nvidia(nforce 100). Existing P35/X38 motherboards do not have these chips so no. You will never see SLI on your P35/X38 based motherboard.
    There's nothing technically different between sli and crossfire, they're the same pci express functionality. What's probable is that Nvidia wrote their drivers to require identifying a nvidia chipset to run, and rather than rewrite their drivers to ignore this requirement, they make vendors buy their chipset instead, which gets the drivers past the nvidia check; it's like old software dongles. They could have added some unecessary hardware process, but it's more likely they're relying on legal and software means to inflicting their nvidia requirement.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •