Results 1 to 25 of 2003

Thread: Phenom 9500 w/ MSI K9A2 Platinum

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    State of Confusion, USA
    Posts
    2,513
    Oldguy, I've been doing alot of testing with your theory about the higher NB multi on a standard 9600. To be honest I was surprised it would even boot with a NB FID higher than 5 (9x)....

    Here are my results. Numbers are "HT Ref x CPU Multi x NB Multi x HT Multi"

    This is a ss from my everyday stable clock:
    SuperPi may be a little low, I didn't delete the data files before this run, the rest of the runs are clean....

    250x10x8x8


    223x11x10x9


    229x11x11x9


    232x11x11x9


    These are just my observations, but it seems like a NB Multi higher than 9x on a standard 9600 only causes the monitoring software to get screwy, especially CPU-Z and Latency.exe. Although AOD gets kinda wierd too, NB "Current Speed" seems to be right, while "Target Speed" is way out of line... It's just the opposite for CPU speed, "Target" seems to be right while "Current" is way out of line...

    I say that because my chip always gets squirley around 2.55Ghz, just as it did at 232x11... Maybe you did hit the CPU Lottery twice Bro...

    Wanna sell that BE? I live in Ohio too!
    AMD FX-8350 (1237 PGN) | Asus Crosshair V Formula (bios 1703) | G.Skill 2133 CL9 @ 2230 9-11-10 | Sapphire HD 6870 | Samsung 830 128Gb SSD / 2 WD 1Tb Black SATA3 storage | Corsair TX750 PSU
    Watercooled ST 120.3 & TC 120.1 / MCP35X XSPC Top / Apogee HD Block | WIN7 64 Bit HP | Corsair 800D Obsidian Case








    First Computer: Commodore Vic 20 (circa 1981).

  2. #2
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    State of Confusion, USA
    Posts
    2,513
    Bob...

    As long as it runs stable I wouldn't sweat the slow Vista boot, I think it's just the nature of the beast...

    Bloated beast that it is... I still miss 2000Pro, I'd be willing to argue that was the best OS Microsoft ever released .........
    AMD FX-8350 (1237 PGN) | Asus Crosshair V Formula (bios 1703) | G.Skill 2133 CL9 @ 2230 9-11-10 | Sapphire HD 6870 | Samsung 830 128Gb SSD / 2 WD 1Tb Black SATA3 storage | Corsair TX750 PSU
    Watercooled ST 120.3 & TC 120.1 / MCP35X XSPC Top / Apogee HD Block | WIN7 64 Bit HP | Corsair 800D Obsidian Case








    First Computer: Commodore Vic 20 (circa 1981).

  3. #3
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Old Vizima
    Posts
    952
    Some Vista users might find the below useful.

    http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleID=2238

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8
    Quote Originally Posted by Blacklash View Post
    Some Vista users might find the below useful.

    http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleID=2238
    Yeah that's not the problem. Not to sound like an ass or anything I do appreciate the idea. Without an overclock vista runs like butter and I don't have a problem with it. For some reason though once I overclock even a little bit vista seems to throw a temper tantrum and takes it's time starting up. Anyone else with vista have this problem? I can't figure out what it is.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •