Oldguy, I've been doing alot of testing with your theory about the higher NB multi on a standard 9600. To be honest I was surprised it would even boot with a NB FID higher than 5 (9x)....
Here are my results. Numbers are "HT Ref x CPU Multi x NB Multi x HT Multi"
This is a ss from my everyday stable clock:
SuperPi may be a little low, I didn't delete the data files before this run, the rest of the runs are clean....
250x10x8x8
223x11x10x9
229x11x11x9
232x11x11x9
These are just my observations, but it seems like a NB Multi higher than 9x on a standard 9600 only causes the monitoring software to get screwy, especially CPU-Z and Latency.exe. Although AOD gets kinda wierd too, NB "Current Speed" seems to be right, while "Target Speed" is way out of line... It's just the opposite for CPU speed, "Target" seems to be right while "Current" is way out of line...
I say that because my chip always gets squirley around 2.55Ghz, just as it did at 232x11... Maybe you did hit the CPU Lottery twice Bro...![]()
Wanna sell that BE? I live in Ohio too!![]()









Reply With Quote

Bookmarks