MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 5674

Thread: **Official e8400/e8500 Retail OC Thread

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Bucharest, Romania
    Posts
    656
    Heh. That's Intel's EIST. Disable it in the bios if you want your full speed all the time.
    Intel i7 920 d0 @ 4410MHz @ 1.36v :: Prolimatech Mega Shadow :: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 F9K :: 6GB Mushkin XP3-15000 :: HIS 5870 :: Corsair 1000W :: HannsG 27.5" :: Lian Li V1010B

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Montenegro
    Posts
    333
    Quote Originally Posted by AriciU View Post
    Heh. That's Intel's EIST. Disable it in the bios if you want your full speed all the time.
    Yeh I knew it. But i tried disabling it but then my PC wont post and I have to reset the Cmos...Weird huh?
    Internet will save the World.

    Foxconn MARS
    Q9650@3.8Ghz
    Gskill 4Gb-1066 DDR2
    EVGA GeForce GTX 560 Ti - 448/C Classified Ultra
    WD 1T Black
    Theramlright Extreme 120
    CORSAIR 650HX

    BenQ FP241W Black 24" 6ms
    Win 7 Ultimate x64

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Montenegro
    Posts
    333
    I'm starting to think these cpu's are cheap for a reason...

    I kind of miss my AMD rig arghhh i had the best of the best , DFI Expert with Opty 165 with best stepping doing 2.9ghz at stock voltage...

    Honestly, the amd rig felt a bit more responsive....
    Internet will save the World.

    Foxconn MARS
    Q9650@3.8Ghz
    Gskill 4Gb-1066 DDR2
    EVGA GeForce GTX 560 Ti - 448/C Classified Ultra
    WD 1T Black
    Theramlright Extreme 120
    CORSAIR 650HX

    BenQ FP241W Black 24" 6ms
    Win 7 Ultimate x64

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Haslett, MI
    Posts
    2,221
    Quote Originally Posted by RedBull78 View Post
    I'm starting to think these cpu's are cheap for a reason...

    I kind of miss my AMD rig arghhh i had the best of the best , DFI Expert with Opty 165 with best stepping doing 2.9ghz at stock voltage...

    Honestly, the amd rig felt a bit more responsive....
    Why don't you run your cpu at stock? It'll still be faster than your AMD rig.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Montenegro
    Posts
    333
    Quote Originally Posted by Zucker2k View Post
    Why don't you run your cpu at stock? It'll still be faster than your AMD rig.
    I never said it was faster. I just think it was more responsive or snappier if you know wut im trying to say.

    I know my current rig is much faster then my last. But again, i never had to worry about voltages or anything else.
    Internet will save the World.

    Foxconn MARS
    Q9650@3.8Ghz
    Gskill 4Gb-1066 DDR2
    EVGA GeForce GTX 560 Ti - 448/C Classified Ultra
    WD 1T Black
    Theramlright Extreme 120
    CORSAIR 650HX

    BenQ FP241W Black 24" 6ms
    Win 7 Ultimate x64

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    53
    Quote Originally Posted by RedBull78 View Post
    I never said it was faster. I just think it was more responsive or snappier if you know wut im trying to say.

    I know my current rig is much faster then my last. But again, i never had to worry about voltages or anything else.
    I agree with you.

    My current E6420 on an Asus P5N-E SLI board overclocked to 3.4GHz just doesn't feel as "responsive" as my HTPC build (AMD X2 5000+, Gigabyte GA-MA69GM-S2H) at stock settings 2.6GHz.

    Also my previous Opteron 146, DFI Ultra-D s939 build seemed "smoother" as well.

    I dunno, it may be all in my head, but of course when it comes to actual performance in applications and games, my current build is faster.

    For all purpose workstations (Office applications, etc) I would put together a cheaper AMD X2 system.

    I had temperature and stability issues with my E8400 as well, but am still waiting for an updated bios release from Asus.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Madison, TN
    Posts
    934
    Quote Originally Posted by RedBull78 View Post
    I never said it was faster. I just think it was more responsive or snappier if you know wut im trying to say.

    I know my current rig is much faster then my last. But again, i never had to worry about voltages or anything else.

    I just switched from DFI Ultra-D and an Opty 185 at 3.1 and I don't really see that the AMD system was any smoother or snappier. Maybe its just me. I'm very happy with the e8400 and my choice of mb. As far as the degradation, its a little scary, but it appears atm that as long as you keep the vcore reasonable, you wont have any problems. Anyway, I hope you get things worked out. I'm pretty new at this, but I can help, let me know.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,463
    Quote Originally Posted by RedBull78 View Post
    I never said it was faster. I just think it was more responsive or snappier if you know wut im trying to say.

    I know my current rig is much faster then my last. But again, i never had to worry about voltages or anything else.
    stop worrying

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •