Page 15 of 19 FirstFirst ... 512131415161718 ... LastLast
Results 351 to 375 of 454

Thread: Intel's 45nm Prices & Performance

  1. #351
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    166
    newegg has the E8400 for $225 right now.
    XEON 3075 (3.2ghz for now)
    Asus P5E
    Crucial Ballistix DDR2-800 2gb (stock for now)
    HD3850 512mb (715/945 for now)
    OCZ Powerstream 520watt
    Coolermaster CM Stacker

  2. #352
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,313
    Quote Originally Posted by strat4812 View Post
    I would also like to know. I was either going to get the 8400 or the 9450, now I am dead set on the 9450. My Maximus Formula has been sitting in the box for almost a month now
    Answer here is really simple:

    Wolfdale: available now
    * 2 cores. More than any games out there use.
    * clocks higher on FSB, less problems with heat.
    * just as cheap as current Core2Duo.
    * No compatibility issues with current motherboards.

    York: could be March, maybe even April.
    *4 cores. Great if you're REALLY into video transcoding/editing and 3D rendering.
    * Otherwise two extra cores are like bulky baggage that you're hauling around...
    * lower FSB and thus lower single-threaded performance. (ie 95% of applications)

    IMHO: If past is any idication, I have funny feeling folks are going to snap up several early "good" batches of E8300/E8400. They are so cheap, you can easily buy half a dozen, cherry pick the best, and sell the rest on ebay. And while quad cores are tickling 3.5Ghz territory, I wouldn't be surprised if aii cooled Wolfdales dont just reach 4ghz, but punch right through.
    Last edited by ***Deimos***; 01-21-2008 at 01:33 PM.

    24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
    1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
    Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
    XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V

  3. #353
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by ***Deimos*** View Post
    Answer here is really simple:

    Wolfdale: available now
    * 2 cores. More than any games out there use.
    * clocks higher on FSB, less problems with heat.
    * just as cheap as current Core2Duo.
    * No compatibility issues with current motherboards.

    York: could be March, maybe even April.
    *4 cores. Great if you're REALLY into video transcoding/editing and 3D rendering.
    * Otherwise two extra cores are like bulky baggage that you're hauling around...
    * lower FSB and thus lower single-threaded performance. (ie 95% of applications)

    IMHO: If past is any idication, I have funny feeling folks are going to snap up several early "good" batches of E8300/E8400. They are so cheap, you can easily buy half a dozen, cherry pick the best, and sell the rest on ebay. And while quad cores are tickling 3.5Ghz territory, I wouldn't be surprised if aii cooled Wolfdales dont just reach 4ghz, but punch right through.
    You sure about the FSB?
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  4. #354
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    93
    Okay, I don't want to litter in this thread but I really need to know this..


    Is that thing about single-threaded performance true? I don't enconde. Well, I do. Reencode various videos to fit on my media
    player, but I doubt that counts. I'm looking at the 8500 now, but that Q9450 is still very appealing though. I have pretty much
    every other component already picked out..Just waiting for the CPU. I'm buying for several years, 4-5, so I want to be prepared.

    So a basic question: Is the Yorkfield significantly faster than Wolfdale in everyday operations and applications? Games? Load times?


    Thanks in advance.

  5. #355
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by Slycer View Post
    Okay, I don't want to litter in this thread but I really need to know this..


    Is that thing about single-threaded performance true? I don't enconde. Well, I do. Reencode various videos to fit on my media
    player, but I doubt that counts. I'm looking at the 8500 now, but that Q9450 is still very appealing though. I have pretty much
    every other component already picked out..Just waiting for the CPU. I'm buying for several years, 4-5, so I want to be prepared.

    So a basic question: Is the Yorkfield significantly faster than Wolfdale in everyday operations and applications? Games? Load times?


    Thanks in advance.
    Ultimately some folks think 4 Quad Cores will not have much RAW Per Core speed or MHz as Dual. In Theory Two Cores should be able to run faster than 4. That goes for overclocking as well. So, single and some Dual threaded apps should run faster than on Dual Core. The FSB's are the same until the Extreme Version ships later with 1600MHz FSB.
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  6. #356
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    93
    Okay, so what do you think? And the 8500 is pretty pricey. The cheapest I could find is only about 50euros cheaper than the 9450.


    And these chips seem to be about as scarce as the Yorkies.

  7. #357
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    'Zona
    Posts
    2,346
    Quote Originally Posted by Donnie27 View Post
    You sure about the FSB?
    Yes, the best X38 boards top out around 475FSB with a quad.
    Duals can hit +500FSB, just saw a thread of a Wolfdale hitting +600FSB.

  8. #358
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    HD0
    Posts
    2,646
    quick question here, do the new e4000s have virtualization? if so they are my next CPU

  9. #359
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    93
    Does anyone in Europe know of any stores that have the E8500 for a reasonable price [200-250€] and ship to other countries?

  10. #360
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,313
    Quote Originally Posted by LordEC911 View Post
    Yes, the best X38 boards top out around 475FSB with a quad.
    Duals can hit +500FSB, just saw a thread of a Wolfdale hitting +600FSB.
    I like to think of this as comparing a BMW 4 door sedan or 4WD crossover like Suzuki
    (this is the dual core Wolfdale)

    to a full 8-9 passenger GMC Safar van or something like Hummer or Escalade (this is the quad core Yorkfield).

    Basically, unless you already have a quad core processor, you dont need really need one, and like those racing stripes on your Corolla, it will only boost your ego. 5+ years from now your future "cellphone" might be more powerful than your computer, so forget about trying to "future proof".

    MUMBO JUMBO TECHIE STUFF
    Single core CPU are great. You can always be sure the core is being used
    But, although you can easily run dozens or even thousands of programs in parallel, some programs may appear to hang the system waiting on IO or other tasks that prevent system from context switching. Besides, 95% of the time the slowdowns are anything but CPU related: slowly loading Windows from hard drive, slowly retrieving web pages, waiting for video card to render the graphics, waiting for video card to decode your Blu-Ray movie.

    Very few people are enthusiastically buying desktops anymore. Its no longer cool. Laptops have been surging in popularity last 5 years. And, even large clunky laptops are being replaced by sleek thin small notebooks - ie Apple Air. Eepc. 15 years ago you had to buy a big ugly $3000 white box to check your email. Its the 21st century now - Blackberrier, smart phones, and game consoles that put most computers to shame. For what you'd spend on a PC, you can buy 2-3 consoles with access to the 90% of console exlusive games.

    24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
    1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
    Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
    XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V

  11. #361
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by LordEC911 View Post
    Yes, the best X38 boards top out around 475FSB with a quad.
    Duals can hit +500FSB, just saw a thread of a Wolfdale hitting +600FSB.
    Sorry my bad, you didn't mention Overclocking! 600FSB, hell I was Impressed with the 550 one guy had I'm leaning more towards Wolfdale just as an Extremely Quiet system without water. With mulitple computers I'm just not multi-tasking enough to justify Quad anyway.
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  12. #362
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,313
    Quote Originally Posted by LordEC911 View Post
    Yes, the best X38 boards top out around 475FSB with a quad.
    Duals can hit +500FSB, just saw a thread of a Wolfdale hitting +600FSB.
    And not so best X38 might not make it to 450. And, if you dont have X38...430? 420?
    Heck, there are even dual core processors that can barely go over 400.

    Realisitically, for 24/7, with 8x multi Q9450 quad, you're looking at getting about 425fsb (giving you 3.4Ghz). So, 9x multi would be nice, and get you 3.8Ghz (if you take care of the very high power and cooling requirements), but expensive!

    Wolfdale, even the cheap E8200 (8x), can get you to 4Ghz, since many P35, X38 and some P965 can do 500Mhz fsb. Even if you get only 3.8Ghz, power and cooling requirements are about half that of quad core... typically much quieter too.

    24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
    1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
    Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
    XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V

  13. #363
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    above USA...below USSR
    Posts
    1,186

    Nehalem is getting closer

    Case-Coolermaster Cosmos S
    MoBo- ASUS Crosshair IV
    Graphics Card-XFX R9 280X [out for RMA] using HD5870
    Hard Drive-Kingston 240Gig V300 master Seagate 160Gb slave Seagate 250Gb slave Seagate 500Gb slave Western Digital 500Gb
    CPU-AMD FX-8320 5Ghz
    RAM 8Gig Corshair c8
    Logitech 5.1 Z5500 BOOST22
    300Gb of MUSICA!!


    Steam ID: alphamonkeywoman
    http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/933ab/

  14. #364
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Posts
    3,433
    nice
    "Cast off your fear. Look forward. Never stand still, retreat and you will age. Hesitate and you will die. SHOUT! My name is…"
    //James

  15. #365
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    498
    E8600 and Q9650 coming?

    Intel Q9650 processor coming in Q3
    http://www.tcmagazine.com/comments.p...=17942&catid=2

    Intel to launch 45nm dual core at 3.33GHz
    http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?op...=5504&Itemid=1
    Faceman


  16. #366
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    East Bay, CA
    Posts
    1,346
    Wheres the E8200?? I'm still waiting for it to come to US???

    I want it NOW!

    Anybody have any idea when?
    Main: oo7
    i7 920 D0 (4Ghz) || Asrock X58 Extreme
    Corsair 8GB DDR3 1600 || HIS HD 6850 1GB
    Corsair HX850 PSU || 2x Seagate 500GB 7200.12
    3x Dell E2311H 23" LED LCD (Eyefinity)


    [Flickr] - Canon 30D || 50mm f/1.8 PRIME || 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

  17. #367
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,313
    Quote Originally Posted by Monkeywoman View Post
    Nehalem core 1.4-1.5x bigger!!?? wha??
    What could they possibly be using all that realestate on? Penryn already has single cycle SSE, shuffle, SSE4, and with micro/macro fusion pushing x86 IPC so high it megaHurts.

    More execution units? Crazy branch prediction that predicts what user is going to click before they do it?

    BTW not looking forward to hyperthreading with Nehalem.. not bad concept, but simpler easier (albeit more die space) to have full extra core. Hyperthreading across multiple CPU cores would be kinda cool though.
    Finally, not sure why Intel following the native quad core bandwagon - do they really except majority (re 80%) of market to buy this?
    http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.a...tno=499&pgno=7

    24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
    1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
    Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
    XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V

  18. #368
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,313
    Quote Originally Posted by Face View Post
    E8600 and Q9650 coming?

    Intel Q9650 processor coming in Q3
    http://www.tcmagazine.com/comments.p...=17942&catid=2

    Intel to launch 45nm dual core at 3.33GHz
    http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?op...=5504&Itemid=1
    We might even see return of P4 clockspeeds within a year. Would make for interesting comparison.. ie 3.6Ghz P4 vs 3.6Ghz Nehalem.

    But, I doubt they'll release many wolfdale at 3.33GHz with existing VID. Certainly for higher clockspeeds they will be forced to go up to something like 1.25V and obviously higher TDP rating.... good to know they have lots of overhead there.

    24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
    1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
    Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
    XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V

  19. #369
    iadstudio
    Guest
    Still no update on timeline for the q9450, huh?

  20. #370
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    515
    Q9450 is close to 470USD where i live. Low supply, high demand i guess. 2 weeks before its in stock.
    Intel is like Egypt in Rome:total war

  21. #371
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Snowdonia
    Posts
    166
    So Q9450 will arrive after February 20 or so?

  22. #372
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    515
    Probably mid march if were lucky
    Intel is like Egypt in Rome:total war

  23. #373
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,087
    I'm gonna go for the super sexy Dualcore. By the time games/programs actually max out the Quadcores, there will be a better chip out.


    All systems sold. Will be back after Sandy Bridge!

  24. #374
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    515
    Omg, now the store says mid march!. . If i dont get hold of one of these soon, im gonna walk into Intel and just take one.
    Intel is like Egypt in Rome:total war

  25. #375
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Grinchville Embassy; Santa Cruz, Aruba
    Posts
    599
    MID MARCH, are they crazy, i need a Q9450 as the last pice of trhe puzzle to finish my build

Page 15 of 19 FirstFirst ... 512131415161718 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •