It seems like the stats are the same. I want something to replace my FX-53 and have an opportunity to get a opty 185. Just wan't to know what the difference is, if any, between the two. Thanx.
It seems like the stats are the same. I want something to replace my FX-53 and have an opportunity to get a opty 185. Just wan't to know what the difference is, if any, between the two. Thanx.
New rig: INWIN D-Frame, i7 4770k @ 4.7 Ghz/1.38V, Swiftech H220, MSI Z87-GD65 Gaming, Team Vulcan DDR3 1600, 9-9-9-24, Samsung 840 pro 256GB, EVGA GTX 780, Corsair 850W
Old rig:Antec 900/GIGABYTE GA-X38T-DQ6
E6750 @ 3.5 GHz/Thermalright 120 extreme/MX2
CORSAIR Vengance 8GB
PNY 8800GT/Thermalright HR-03 GT
Old, old rig: FX-53/GIGABYTE K8NSNXP-939 nForce3 Ultra/1GB CORSAIR 3200XLPRO
X800XTPE/WD 74GB Raptor/250GB Caviar
The Opteron 185 is better silicon and the Opteron series excels at Video Encoding actually better than C2D or C2Q does![]()
SuperMicro X8SAX
Xeon 5620
12GB - Crucial ECC DDR3 1333
Intel 520 180GB Cherryville
Areca 1231ML ~ 2~ 250GB Seagate ES.2 ~ Raid 0 ~ 4~ Hitachi 5K3000 2TB ~ Raid 6 ~
the Opty 185 and FX-60 are pretty much the same thing except the FX has an unlocked multi.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
Groucho Marx
i know my grammar sux so stop hitting me
exactly the same except the FX60 has unlocked multiplier...
Brother E - how is the Opty better @ vid encoding? got any linky reads? cheers![]()
DNA = Design Not Accident
DNA = Darwin Not Accurate
![]()
![]()
heatware / ebay
HARDWARE I only own Xeons, Extreme Editions & Lian Li's
https://prism-break.org/
Ryzen 9 3900X w/ NH-U14s on MSI X570 Unify
32 GB Patriot Viper Steel 3733 CL14 (1.51v)
RX 5700 XT w/ 2x 120mm fan mod (2 GHz)
Tons of NVMe & SATA SSDs
LG 27GL850 + Asus MG279Q
Meshify C white
Apparently my mobo does not support this processor but supports the FX-60?!?
http://www.gigabyte.co.nz/Support/Mo...ProductID=1788
I don't get it.![]()
New rig: INWIN D-Frame, i7 4770k @ 4.7 Ghz/1.38V, Swiftech H220, MSI Z87-GD65 Gaming, Team Vulcan DDR3 1600, 9-9-9-24, Samsung 840 pro 256GB, EVGA GTX 780, Corsair 850W
Old rig:Antec 900/GIGABYTE GA-X38T-DQ6
E6750 @ 3.5 GHz/Thermalright 120 extreme/MX2
CORSAIR Vengance 8GB
PNY 8800GT/Thermalright HR-03 GT
Old, old rig: FX-53/GIGABYTE K8NSNXP-939 nForce3 Ultra/1GB CORSAIR 3200XLPRO
X800XTPE/WD 74GB Raptor/250GB Caviar
SuperMicro X8SAX
Xeon 5620
12GB - Crucial ECC DDR3 1333
Intel 520 180GB Cherryville
Areca 1231ML ~ 2~ 250GB Seagate ES.2 ~ Raid 0 ~ 4~ Hitachi 5K3000 2TB ~ Raid 6 ~
no consumer mainboard officially supports opteron CPUs, cause they are ment to run in workstations. but itīs just a s939 cpu so it will run in any s939 mainboard that supports dualcore CPUs.
MSI 790FX-GD70 (BIOS 1.D4)//PhenomII 1090T
2x 2GB G.Skill F3-12800CL7D-4GBRH//ASUS EAH5970
OCZ Agility 120GB//2x Hitachi Deskstar (2x500GB) RAID0//ZALMAN ZM850-HP 850W
DFI LanpartyUT RDX200 CF-DR (BIOS 12/23/05)//AMD Opteron 165 CCBBE 0616 XPMW 334x9 1.375Vx112%
2x 1024 MB G.SKILL F1-4000BIU2-2GBHV PC4000//2x Sapphire HD2900PRO(modded bios 845/950) 512mb CrossFire
2x WD Caviar RE2 WD4000YR (400 GB) RAID0//OCZ GameXStream 700W
Motorola Milestone CyanogenMOD 6.1.0 RC0 Android2.2.1
MSI 790FX-GD70 (BIOS 1.D4)//PhenomII 1090T
2x 2GB G.Skill F3-12800CL7D-4GBRH//ASUS EAH5970
OCZ Agility 120GB//2x Hitachi Deskstar (2x500GB) RAID0//ZALMAN ZM850-HP 850W
DFI LanpartyUT RDX200 CF-DR (BIOS 12/23/05)//AMD Opteron 165 CCBBE 0616 XPMW 334x9 1.375Vx112%
2x 1024 MB G.SKILL F1-4000BIU2-2GBHV PC4000//2x Sapphire HD2900PRO(modded bios 845/950) 512mb CrossFire
2x WD Caviar RE2 WD4000YR (400 GB) RAID0//OCZ GameXStream 700W
Motorola Milestone CyanogenMOD 6.1.0 RC0 Android2.2.1
It will run, but it probably won't support Cool'n'Quiet. If you're an overclocker that probably doesn't matter to you. For me, I rewrote my ACPI DSDT (on Linux) so that it would enable C'n'Q at VIDs and FIDs of my own choosing. Under Windows, no such luck.
(Running an Opteron 185 on an Asus A8V-Deluxe, latest BIOS...) I have it undervolted and underclocked at the lowest setting (0.8V at 800MHz), and overvolted and overclocked at the top setting. (1.45V at 3.0GHz). I also have 4x1GB registered ECC DDR400 in it; the BIOS automatically limits it to DDR333 but I tweak the memory controller in my boot script to bring it back to DDR400/1T.
DNA = Design Not Accident
DNA = Darwin Not Accurate
![]()
![]()
heatware / ebay
HARDWARE I only own Xeons, Extreme Editions & Lian Li's
https://prism-break.org/
They're registered DIMMs. Not possible at all with unbuffered.
Although I personally find it difficult to believe, Opterons have 3 HT links and A64s only have 1. I beilieve the extra HT links are primarily for multi socket mobos so that cpus can dirrectly interconnect. I cant really see there being an advantage of the extra 2 links in a 939 board tho.
Anyone?
Gigabyte EX58-UD4P on EK Waterblocks in Corsair 800D
i7 920 @ 4Ghz on H20
3x2 Gigs of OCZ 1600 DDR3
2X 5850 Xfire on H20
2x 320Gb Seagate 7200.11 in Raid 0
4x 1.5Tb Seagate 7200.11 in Raid 5
PC Power and Cooling Silencer 750
Win 7 Ultimate x64
Abit AT832X
AMD 3800+ Naked @ 2.8GHz On Thermalright SI-120
4 Gigs of Gskill PC4000
2x HIS 3870 Xfire
2X 160 Seagate 7200 in Raid 0
4X 250 Hitachi 7200 in Raid 5
Coolermaster 650 Watt PSU
Win 7 Ultimate x64
the opteron 1xx series only have 1 ht link enabled, like 2xx have two - makes sense.
the only difference i can think of is that the optys come in a variety of steppings that tend to clock better than A64s. i think that's mainly statistically speaking; when chosing between A64/opteron, it's generally down to luck.
Ryzen 9 3900X w/ NH-U14s on MSI X570 Unify
32 GB Patriot Viper Steel 3733 CL14 (1.51v)
RX 5700 XT w/ 2x 120mm fan mod (2 GHz)
Tons of NVMe & SATA SSDs
LG 27GL850 + Asus MG279Q
Meshify C white
Opteron 1xx series are pretty much the same as any other Socket 939 processor - the die has 3 HT links but only one of them is pinned out on the socket. Opteron 2xx and 8xx have all three links present on the Socket 940 pinout, but 2xx only allows one link to support ccHT (cache coherent) mode for communicating with another processor. 8xx allows any/all 3 links to be ccHT.
Talking about any advantage to having 2 more HT links in a 939 board makes no sense. This is the main difference between Socket 939 and Socket 940 - the pins that were used for two of the three HT links in Socket 940 were replaced in the Socket 939 by pins for the memory controller. Since Socket 939 was designed to use unbuffered memory, all of its data lines are doubled to allow the chip to drive up to 4 unbuffered DIMMs. Without that doubling, it would only be able to drive one unbuffered DIMM per channel, which would have been too limiting.
The whole point of Socket 939 was to provide a cheaper option for the desktop, that wouldn't require buffered/registered DIMMs. The only way to support unbuffered was by providing redundant signal lines for the memory interface. The only way to get those signal lines and still make it cheap enough for the desktop market was to remove something else from the socket - the 2 missing HT links.
Interesting to note that about 160 pins are different between Socket 939 and 940, so if you wanted a socket with both (a) all 3 HT links and (b) flexible memory interface support it would take at least 1100 pins. Kinda tells you a little about what's in Socket 1207.
Bookmarks