I bet this card will cost $900-1000 in the UK, well at least for the first couple of months after release.
I bet this card will cost $900-1000 in the UK, well at least for the first couple of months after release.
is this card gonna be based on the G100 or the G92 ? Because I've been hearing about a dual gpu solution from nvidia based on the g92 =(
Lian Li V600B | Intel Core2Extreme QX9650 | Intel DX48BT2 | Corsair TWIN3X4096-1600C7DHXIN | Visiontek 4870 X2 | PC Power & Cooling TurbCool 860 | 2x Pioneer DVR 112D | VRaptor 300 | Seagate 7200.11 750GB | Kipsch Promedia 5.1 Ultra | Sennheiser PC 155 USB | Dell 3007WFP-HC | Logitech G5 | Logitech Dinovo Edge
Ugh, I'd much rather prefer a G100 based 9800GT or GTS, something cheap but effective.
CPU: Lapped QX6700 @ 4000MHz, bench @ 4250MHz
RAM: Teamgroup DDRII PC6400 @ 1066 cas5
MOBO: eVGA 680i SLI
VID: eVGA 8800GTX + Zotac 8800GTX SLI...GPU voltmodded....Memory voltmodded (both cards)
BOOT Drive: Seagate 320GB 7200.10 RAID 0
Storage Drive: Seagate 640GB 7200.11 RAID 1
Samsung Super Write Master
Coolermaster Real Power Pro 850W
Custom Bench Table
LaCie 19inch CRT
Single Stage Phase Change - CPU
Water - VGA's
"To exist in this vast universe for a speck of time is the great gift of life. Our tiny sliver of time is our gift of life. It is our only life. The universe will go on, indifferent to our brief existence, but while we are here we touch not just part of that vastness, but also the lives around us. Life is the gift each of us has been given. Each life is our own and no one else's. It is precious beyond all counting. It is the greatest value we have. Cherish it for what it truly is."
GTX and Ultra were £480 in Uk when it was first released so im expecting the same for this one. Ive already got £800 set aside anyway for Q9450 and a 9800GTX and maybe a new PSU because of this stupid 6pin and 8pin power.
i hope this is complete crap or that they will have a highend card as well (single GPU) i was hopping for a 2tflop beast on a single GPU int he 9800gtx. but i fear this is AMD's fault they can't challenge Nvidia on the high end so nvidia just has to beat them by a little bit and they make way more money.
CPU: Intel Core i7 3930K @ 4.5GHz
Mobo: Asus Rampage IV Extreme
RAM: 32GB (8x4GB) Patriot Viper EX @ 1866mhz
GPU: EVGA GTX Titan (1087Boost/6700Mem)
Physx: Evga GTX 560 2GB
Sound: Creative XFI Titanium
Case: Modded 700D
PSU: Corsair 1200AX (Fully Sleeved)
Storage: 2x120GB OCZ Vertex 3's in RAID 0 + WD 600GB V-Raptor + Seagate 1TB
Cooling: XSPC Raystorm, 2x MCP 655's, FrozenQ Warp Drive, EX360+MCR240+EX120 Rad's
"To exist in this vast universe for a speck of time is the great gift of life. Our tiny sliver of time is our gift of life. It is our only life. The universe will go on, indifferent to our brief existence, but while we are here we touch not just part of that vastness, but also the lives around us. Life is the gift each of us has been given. Each life is our own and no one else's. It is precious beyond all counting. It is the greatest value we have. Cherish it for what it truly is."
I dont know if 9800GX2 is the right name - after all, it could just as easily be the 8800GX2 w/ the dual G92's as rumored earlier, as a response to the R680/3870X2
I hope they release a ~400$ single card as well its also a shame that that didnt call it the 9800XT2
Nah, the cell is way over rated. They are trying to sell it like its some monster advancement, but it isnt. Its an advancement, but not a monster one. The cell is awesome at crunching. But it, in no way, threatens the gpu market at all. (the cpu market either, for that matter) That stupid thing is way over rated by some.
Last edited by Decami; 12-24-2007 at 01:11 PM.
This post above was delayed 90 times by Nvidia. Cause that's their thing, thats what they do.
This Announcement of the delayed post above has been brought to you by Nvidia Inc.
RIGGY
case:Antec 1200
MB: XFX Nforce 750I SLI 72D9
CPU:E8400 (1651/4x9) 3712.48
MEM:4gb Gskill DDR21000 (5-5-5-15)
GPU: NVIDIA GTX260 EVGA SSC (X2 in SLI) both 652/1403
PS:Corsair 650TX
OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ultimate
--Cooling--
5x120mm 1x200mm
Zalman 9700LED
Displays: Samsung LN32B650/Samsung 2243BWX/samsung P2350
I agree. Of all the cards I've gone through, the 7950x2 has been a card lasted longer than most in the household. My son is running it now. Plenty of firepower for his P5W non SLI mobo. Although its a bit out dated now, it still has enough juice.
Given that Intel won't be running SLI any time soon, I really like the idea of a single card, multi GPU solution.
9900k @ 5.1Ghz
Asus Maximus Hero XI
32GB (8 x 4) Gskill @4000
Strix 2080 Ti OC
OS & Apps: Samsung 970 Pro 512GB
Games: Samsung 970 Pro 1TB
Storage: Crucial M500 2TB
Seasonic Platinum 1000W
Phanteks Evolv X
Wow lots of Fud/bad speculation in this thread...
I'll start from the beginning correcting people.
It won't cost $800, unless Nvidia is TRYING to not compete.
R680, HD3870x2, is supposedly being priced under $400.
With HD3870 in CF battling 8800GTs and with the AMD card having a slight lead, I would have to expect Nvidia to price their dual card somewhere close, no more than $450.
As for the poster talking about raytracing, that is still at least 5 years off, if not more. These are more about being able to hit both the gaming/enthusiast market and the GPGPU market. With multicore becoming the future, I expect us to leave APIs behind, bye bye MS.
About the PS3 "excelling" at Folding@Home, there were some 200k units crunching compared to the couple of thousand ATi cards crunching... a really fair comparison.
Jason- IMO this card has to be using a G92, 8800GT specs to be more clear, a G92 GTS has a 140w TDP leaving the roughly 20w to spare, 75+75+150, I highly doubt that Nvidia would come that close to the power limit.
The only other possibility is maybe a midrange of their new 9series desktop chip or possibly a mobile of their new highend, though mobiles usually aren't ready at the launch of a new product so don't hold your breathe.
8800GT speced G92 sounds like the most logical solution, though that leaves Nvidia equal to or a bit behind AMD's solution.
Derek- I doubt that will happen, though it might be nice.
Zytek- Umm... R680 should be MORE than a handful for Nvidias new dual GPU.
HWbot - Team: XtremeSystems
XS cruncher - Team: XtremeSystems
OCN Feedback
HEAT
*** Being kind is sometimes better then being right.
"To exist in this vast universe for a speck of time is the great gift of life. Our tiny sliver of time is our gift of life. It is our only life. The universe will go on, indifferent to our brief existence, but while we are here we touch not just part of that vastness, but also the lives around us. Life is the gift each of us has been given. Each life is our own and no one else's. It is precious beyond all counting. It is the greatest value we have. Cherish it for what it truly is."
Why not gaming? Consoles are known for just that..?
I'm not much into consoles at all but my brother is so he tells me we are not seeing not even half of what ps3 can do. He says GT3 will change everything among other exclusive games. I kind a believe him since consoles have much advanced programming tools for games. Dont ya think?
Isn't it weird we are getting news on the 9800GX2 before there's any news on the 9800?
It is probably true that we are not seeing the full potential of the PS3 and that will take a while, but PCs were already surpassing it before it was even launched.
The RSX graphics chip in the PS3 is just a GeForce 7900 clocked at 500 core/600 memory and this makes a GeForce 7900 GTX faster. The Cell processor is fine and dandy but it's really tough to program for and well (which is why it will take a while before we will see the PS3's full potential), a C2D will surpass it when used for the kind of code seen in games. About memory on the PS3: RSX has 256MB under it's command and Cell can use another 256MB, this is not too bad as you will not be playing games at such a high resolution compared to PCs.
The best part about a console is that you have quite some time to optimize your games for it. The specs will not change and every PS3 can do the same, this is a completely different story on a PC where you have thousands of combinations for every PC. You have different amounts of RAM, hundreds types of GPUs at multiple speeds and many different CPUs at varying speeds. Then you have the operating systems that differ, a couple of other variables and the fact that systems progress through time, which make it impossible to know what you are programming for. All these things make it impossible to optimize games for the PC to the same level you can on a console. (all this also counts for every console so far, X-box 360, Wii, DS, PSP and previous generations)
So from a capability point of view, the PC is far ahead of modern consoles but utilizing them to their full potential will never be accomplished and this is different for a console.
"When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman
Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |
Bookmarks