Phenom and 3DMark

[BadNizze]

Hipro: 4,5k @ 2750 is FAST, Don´t think i can match that...ever, But I will try My DFi board, does not suffer from the Low NB clock bug. As my older Gigabyte did\does.

Regarding the FSB thing, K8 does not scale with HTT\FSB I have not done testing with K10, but i think it´s safe to say that running high HTT does not give much in terms of preformance on K10 either. But it would be nice to see what a york does @ 3Ghz with 333FSb for reference. Could someone run 2,4ghz on a York to? Would be nice to see how it scales with Mhz aswell! No one have tested york @ low mhz, right?

[massman]

No one have tested york @ low mhz, right?

I'm keeping track of as many 45nm 1M results as possible. This is 1M vs MHz, not useful here, but I have one result with very low clock freq, which shows that it scales pretty good.

[Simps]

Macci will beat it

[KTE]

Regarding the FSB thing, K8 does not scale with HTT\FSB I have not done testing with K10, but i think it´s safe to say that running high HTT does not give much in terms of preformance on K10 either.

If FSB gave him no perf increase, he wouldn't have increased it by that much but ran it stock, no? Does it hike power consumption and need higher volts for no reason?
As for K10h HT means nothing -> it makes a good difference if you're below 1800MHz anyway. All things constant (stock) Phenom 9500 2600XT 2k6:
HT 200MHz: 4438
HT 1000MHz: 4742
HT 1800MHz: 4783

Forgive the card.

[BadNizze]

If FSB gave him no perf increase, he wouldn't have increased it by that much but ran it stock, no? Does it hike power consumption and need higher volts for no reason?
As for K10h HT means nothing -> it makes a good difference if you're below 1800MHz anyway. All things constant (stock) Phenom 9500 2600XT 2k6:
HT 200MHz: 4438
HT 1000MHz: 4742
HT 1800MHz: 4783

Forgive the card.

I think I´m missing something in youre post, because of the language barrier. Anyway, my point is that running HTT over stock on an AMD rigg does close to nothing for preformace, Right? I was actualy defending hipro by saying that high HTT does close to nothing for preformace with AMD cpu´s. No the other way around. I think that hipro´s score is 100% fair BTW. Towards me or anyone else that for that matter. I´m doing the best i can @ 2750mhz and so is hipro, if hi runs 200 or 333 or 500 fsb is fine by me! But i would be nice to see what a york pulls in 06 CPU tests... @ 2420mhz, 2750mhz and 3000mhz

[KTE]

KTE, why doesn't the cpu score go up?

No idea but HT increases bandwidth between GPU>CPU so GPU gains if bottlenecked.

I think I´m missing something in youre post, because of the language barrier. Anyway, my point is that running HTT over stock on an AMD rigg does close to nothing for preformace, Right? I was actualy defending hipro by saying that high HTT does close to nothing for preformace with AMD cpu´s.

I understood you fine the first time. I don't think it's a true generalization TBH. I know 1800 from 1000 gets you good gains and people said the same thing when HT was at 1000. Have you tested 2600MHz HT vs 1800MHz HT across all apps? Try it. I would if I could but mine is hevaing like a dud. I don't see why AMD would increase HT from X2 to K10h to Shanghai if it did nothing on perf in any app.