Results 1 to 25 of 299

Thread: How to Modify Your HD2900 BIOS Clock Frequencies by Hex File

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    182
    Can confirm that at least Crysis scales very well with higher clock on GPU.
    ASUS P5K Premium 2.00G/A02 - Bios 1101
    Q9650 @ 4.0@1.30 - 24/7
    Corsair 4 x 2048 8500 C5
    ASUS HD 6950 2 GB.
    Cooling: PA 120.3 w/ shroud. (CPU / GPU / NB)
    Mist 800W
    Lian Li PC-A7010

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by roger_h99.nor View Post
    Can confirm that at least Crysis scales very well with higher clock on GPU.
    How well is "very well" ?? For me an overclock of 820/950 only meant going from 31 fps timebench at stock speeds all the way to a mere 34 fps. That's like a ten percent increase but really gameplay-wise i consider that mediocre at best.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    182
    31 fps --> 34 fps = 10%
    743Mhz --> 820 Mhz = 10%

    I seldom see games respond to OC as well as this.

    To compare (my results):
    743 core gives 40-42 in Crysis
    900 core gives 50-55 in Crysis.

    Settings:
    x6800 @ 3,5
    Crysis: 1680 x 1050, everything at 'Medium', No AA.

    Regards
    ASUS P5K Premium 2.00G/A02 - Bios 1101
    Q9650 @ 4.0@1.30 - 24/7
    Corsair 4 x 2048 8500 C5
    ASUS HD 6950 2 GB.
    Cooling: PA 120.3 w/ shroud. (CPU / GPU / NB)
    Mist 800W
    Lian Li PC-A7010

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by roger_h99.nor View Post
    31 fps --> 34 fps = 10%
    743Mhz --> 820 Mhz = 10%

    I seldom see games respond to OC as well as this.

    To compare (my results):
    743 core gives 40-42 in Crysis
    900 core gives 50-55 in Crysis.

    Settings:
    x6800 @ 3,5
    Crysis: 1680 x 1050, everything at 'Medium', No AA.

    Regards
    Sounds good and all but at least in my case i cannot get the cards stable past 850 on the core. Increasing vgpu does completely nill to the setup's stability. Furthermore some games get artefacts past a certain overclock. Also heat is not on issue since both cards are watercooled. I guess for me a ten percent increase is not really worth it.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    North USA
    Posts
    670
    Quote Originally Posted by roger_h99.nor View Post
    31 fps --> 34 fps = 10%
    743Mhz --> 820 Mhz = 10%

    I seldom see games respond to OC as well as this.

    To compare (my results):
    743 core gives 40-42 in Crysis
    900 core gives 50-55 in Crysis.

    Settings:
    x6800 @ 3,5
    Crysis: 1680 x 1050, everything at 'Medium', No AA.

    Regards
    The 2900 is nearly completely GPU bound. Too much memory bandwidth for it's own good.
    Asus P6T-DLX V2 1104 & i7 920 @ 4116 1.32v(Windows Reported) 1.3375v (BIOS Set) 196x20(1) HT OFF
    6GB OCZ Platinum DDR3 1600 3x2GB@ 7-7-7-24, 1.66v, 1568Mhz
    Sapphire 5870 @ 985/1245 1.2v
    X-Fi "Fatal1ty" & Klipsch ProMedia Ultra 5.1 Speaks/Beyerdynamic DT-880 Pro (2005 Model) and a mini3 amp
    WD 150GB Raptor (Games) & 2x WD 640GB (System)
    PC Power & Cooling 750w
    Homebrew watercooling on CPU and GPU
    and the best monitor ever made + a Samsung 226CW + Dell P2210 for eyefinity
    Windows 7 Utimate x64

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •