MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 299

Thread: How to Modify Your HD2900 BIOS Clock Frequencies by Hex File

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    547
    Praimm
    try a:atiflash -f -p 0 name.rom

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    142
    I somehow agree with Guz that it is not tangible or significant improvement in the fps when you overclock the GPU.

    Must be something to do with the timings of the memory because I cannot feel the games running faster with my naked eyes

    For sure the GPU runs hotter with the new bios (currently at 830/950), which confirms the increased speed in the GPU.

    Can somebody post results pre and post bios mod? No 3Dmarks please
    Mobo: Gigabyte EX58-UD3R | CPU: Intel i7 920@4.2Ghz | Mem: Mushkin 1600 3x2gb | PSU: Corsair HX850 | GPU: x2 GTX 460 1Gb SLI | Vista Win7 X64

  3. #3
    Team KOC2.com
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Indonesia
    Posts
    986
    could someone help me modified this bios to 1.25v and 1.3v 850/920 just perfect. i'm using Abit X38 mobo and never success to make the correct checksum, always black screen after reboot

    thanks....
    Attached Files Attached Files

    E8600 Q820A750
    DFI LanParty UT P35-T2R - Abit IX38 QuadGT - Asus P5B Deluxe - Biostar TP45 HP
    Team Xtreem PC-5300 C3 2GB - Crucial 10th Anniversary 2GB - Team Xtreem PC8500 C5 2GB
    Winfast 8600GT
    Silverstone Olympia 1000w
    andre X_X -72c CO2 Cascade

    My R22/CO2 Cascade Project

  4. #4
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    841
    Quote Originally Posted by askimo View Post
    I somehow agree with Guz that it is not tangible or significant improvement in the fps when you overclock the GPU.

    Must be something to do with the timings of the memory because I cannot feel the games running faster with my naked eyes

    For sure the GPU runs hotter with the new bios (currently at 830/950), which confirms the increased speed in the GPU.

    Can somebody post results pre and post bios mod? No 3Dmarks please
    I ran the World in Conflict benchmark and I did not see any improvement in framerates with my card overclocked, in fact, gameplay was more jerky w/ my GPU OC'd.

    Benchmark test was run @ 1920x1200 w/ settings on high w/ the exception of World Distance set at medium.
    850/1000/1.25V: 32/14/73
    840/1000/1.25V: 32/14/73
    820/1050/1.20V: 33/14/86
    800/1100/1.20V: 34/12/88
    780/1050/1.20V: 33/15/84 <-- Stock Settings

    I'm not sure how GPU bound the WiC benchmark is but this game has been a biatch to get running smoothly so I've been spending alot of time trying to get this going more smoothly. It would help if ATi could get CF running......
    QX 9650 | Maximus II Formula | G.SKILL 4GB (2 x 2GB) PC2 8500 | Sapphire 4850 X2 2GB| Auzen X-Fi Prelude 7.1 | 3x's WD 150GB Raptors & 2x's 1TB Seagate 7200.11 | Silverstone OP1200 | SilverStone TJ07 | Dell 2707WFP

    EK-RES 250 --> Swiftech MCP655 --> Apogee GTZ --> Enzotech Sapphire NB --> Feser X-Changer 360


  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    142
    Quote Originally Posted by TouGe View Post
    I ran the World in Conflict benchmark and I did not see any improvement in framerates with my card overclocked, in fact, gameplay was more jerky w/ my GPU OC'd.

    Benchmark test was run @ 1920x1200 w/ settings on high w/ the exception of World Distance set at medium.
    850/1000/1.25V: 32/14/73
    840/1000/1.25V: 32/14/73
    820/1050/1.20V: 33/14/86
    800/1100/1.20V: 34/12/88
    780/1050/1.20V: 33/15/84 <-- Stock Settings

    I'm not sure how GPU bound the WiC benchmark is but this game has been a biatch to get running smoothly so I've been spending alot of time trying to get this going more smoothly. It would help if ATi could get CF running......
    Thanks for the benchies TouGe

    You confirmed my theory that is no improvement in running this card overclocked. The increase in speed doesn't translate in more fps just more heat and noise, but what is the real reason for this behavior? Are really the table timings affecting the performance of this card?
    Mobo: Gigabyte EX58-UD3R | CPU: Intel i7 920@4.2Ghz | Mem: Mushkin 1600 3x2gb | PSU: Corsair HX850 | GPU: x2 GTX 460 1Gb SLI | Vista Win7 X64

  6. #6
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    182
    Can confirm that at least Crysis scales very well with higher clock on GPU.
    ASUS P5K Premium 2.00G/A02 - Bios 1101
    Q9650 @ 4.0@1.30 - 24/7
    Corsair 4 x 2048 8500 C5
    ASUS HD 6950 2 GB.
    Cooling: PA 120.3 w/ shroud. (CPU / GPU / NB)
    Mist 800W
    Lian Li PC-A7010

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by roger_h99.nor View Post
    Can confirm that at least Crysis scales very well with higher clock on GPU.
    How well is "very well" ?? For me an overclock of 820/950 only meant going from 31 fps timebench at stock speeds all the way to a mere 34 fps. That's like a ten percent increase but really gameplay-wise i consider that mediocre at best.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    182
    31 fps --> 34 fps = 10%
    743Mhz --> 820 Mhz = 10%

    I seldom see games respond to OC as well as this.

    To compare (my results):
    743 core gives 40-42 in Crysis
    900 core gives 50-55 in Crysis.

    Settings:
    x6800 @ 3,5
    Crysis: 1680 x 1050, everything at 'Medium', No AA.

    Regards
    ASUS P5K Premium 2.00G/A02 - Bios 1101
    Q9650 @ 4.0@1.30 - 24/7
    Corsair 4 x 2048 8500 C5
    ASUS HD 6950 2 GB.
    Cooling: PA 120.3 w/ shroud. (CPU / GPU / NB)
    Mist 800W
    Lian Li PC-A7010

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by TouGe View Post
    I ran the World in Conflict benchmark and I did not see any improvement in framerates with my card overclocked, in fact, gameplay was more jerky w/ my GPU OC'd.

    Benchmark test was run @ 1920x1200 w/ settings on high w/ the exception of World Distance set at medium.
    850/1000/1.25V: 32/14/73
    840/1000/1.25V: 32/14/73
    820/1050/1.20V: 33/14/86
    800/1100/1.20V: 34/12/88
    780/1050/1.20V: 33/15/84 <-- Stock Settings

    I'm not sure how GPU bound the WiC benchmark is but this game has been a biatch to get running smoothly so I've been spending alot of time trying to get this going more smoothly. It would help if ATi could get CF running......
    I'm pretty sure CF is running in Wic, i get almost the same numbers as you do Touge. If memory serves me right, benching with one card gives lower results. Just to make sure turn off CF and do another run.

  10. #10
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    841
    Okay, I've something interesting to share and was wondering if others could help explain this to me.
    All my previous clocking on this were done with the Quantum editor using my stock BIOS and I've had a heck of a time getting good results from my OCing. Well, yesterday I decided to modify my BIOS using a Hex editor and took steps to correct the checksum as well. Now everything works great and I am now stable in 3DMark05/06 firefly test (which use to lock up @ 850MHz) and I am also getting better results in CF using WiC benchmark.

    Quote Originally Posted by TouGe View Post
    I ran the World in Conflict benchmark and I did not see any improvement in framerates with my card overclocked, in fact, gameplay was more jerky w/ my GPU OC'd.

    Benchmark test was run @ 1920x1200 w/ settings on high w/ the exception of World Distance set at medium.
    850/1000/1.25V: 32/14/73
    840/1000/1.25V: 32/14/73
    820/1050/1.20V: 33/14/86
    800/1100/1.20V: 34/12/88
    780/1050/1.20V: 33/15/84 <-- Stock Settings
    My current clocks are 850/900/1.25V. I ran WiC @ 1920x1200 w/ everything on high and AA/AF disabled.

    Avg: 46
    Min: 22
    Max: 140

    Can anyone explain why I'm getting much better results? Could the invalid checksum have caused conflicts with CF and Catalyst drivers? I can't think of any other reason why I am problem free at these clocks. I am sooooo happy right now.

    Final question. What are the upper limits in regards to core/VRM temps for the HD2900XT? Is there a white paper out there some where? Right now my temps are GPU1/2: 87/85 VRM: 80/77 while running 7 consecutive benchmarks in WiC.

    Thanks guys......
    QX 9650 | Maximus II Formula | G.SKILL 4GB (2 x 2GB) PC2 8500 | Sapphire 4850 X2 2GB| Auzen X-Fi Prelude 7.1 | 3x's WD 150GB Raptors & 2x's 1TB Seagate 7200.11 | Silverstone OP1200 | SilverStone TJ07 | Dell 2707WFP

    EK-RES 250 --> Swiftech MCP655 --> Apogee GTZ --> Enzotech Sapphire NB --> Feser X-Changer 360


  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    7
    hi there, is there any1 with modded bios for sapphire 2900pro 512mb gddr3 256bit? after install of 7.12 cat my rivatuner oc is useless cause it hold the oc via rivatuner but when runing 3d mark 06 , in last 2 test cards not OCed like had to be 770/1100 but only for stock 600/800 for 3d.
    ok and here we go, i readed all blahblah about bios editing and tried my doing i found there is frequencies on many places in the bios so i am deep in sh...
    also this card has 1V 2d and 1.08V 3d which hold my core on 770mhz...
    can any1 advice how to find which numbers are the correct one if they r on many places? cause all normal tools which edit 2900xt bioses are unable to work for my card as it uses pcb from 2900gt i think, cause its 256bit, only one 8pin conector for power... my 2d is 506/513 and 3d 600/800... seting 3d voltage to 1.2-1.25V can boost my oc well i think if there is no danger in power circuits as it been designed for lower power draw...
    any advice welcome...

    http://img222.imageshack.us/my.php?image=ocge3.jpg
    Last edited by mossad; 12-22-2007 at 08:49 PM. Reason: picture link to show that my crappy card is real 256bit ;)

    #1 Rig:Allandale [1.465V / 1.440V] @ 2.6GHz / 3.5Ghz [EIST] ::: Asus P5B de-luxe [1226] ::: G.Skill 2x1GB 800Mhz 5.5.5.15 1.8V @ 874Mhz 5.6.6.18 2.15V ::: Ati HD2900Pro 512MB 256bit ::: [Raid 0] WD 37GB [Silentmaxed] ::: WD 2500KS ::: Chieftec BA-02B-B-SL ::: Enermax Liberty 500W ::: EIZO M1900-K ::: Genius 5.1 HT ver.2 :::

  12. #12
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    182
    Welcome to the forum

    Post your bios here, If it's similar to the 512bits bios it's easy to mod it.

    Have you tried the Foxconn-tool yet?

    Regrads.
    ASUS P5K Premium 2.00G/A02 - Bios 1101
    Q9650 @ 4.0@1.30 - 24/7
    Corsair 4 x 2048 8500 C5
    ASUS HD 6950 2 GB.
    Cooling: PA 120.3 w/ shroud. (CPU / GPU / NB)
    Mist 800W
    Lian Li PC-A7010

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    7
    this is my original sapphire bios : http://www.mediafire.com/?7bgddxsjnlh
    as u wish ;]
    also i tried some util especialy for 2900xt bios edit oc but i dunno if it was that from foxconn but it wont work for my 256bit card cause there were no frequencies in the boxes where they had to be
    Last edited by mossad; 12-23-2007 at 03:21 AM. Reason: i forgot ;)

    #1 Rig:Allandale [1.465V / 1.440V] @ 2.6GHz / 3.5Ghz [EIST] ::: Asus P5B de-luxe [1226] ::: G.Skill 2x1GB 800Mhz 5.5.5.15 1.8V @ 874Mhz 5.6.6.18 2.15V ::: Ati HD2900Pro 512MB 256bit ::: [Raid 0] WD 37GB [Silentmaxed] ::: WD 2500KS ::: Chieftec BA-02B-B-SL ::: Enermax Liberty 500W ::: EIZO M1900-K ::: Genius 5.1 HT ver.2 :::

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by TouGe View Post
    Okay, I've something interesting to share and was wondering if others could help explain this to me.
    All my previous clocking on this were done with the Quantum editor using my stock BIOS and I've had a heck of a time getting good results from my OCing. Well, yesterday I decided to modify my BIOS using a Hex editor and took steps to correct the checksum as well. Now everything works great and I am now stable in 3DMark05/06 firefly test (which use to lock up @ 850MHz) and I am also getting better results in CF using WiC benchmark.



    My current clocks are 850/900/1.25V. I ran WiC @ 1920x1200 w/ everything on high and AA/AF disabled.

    Avg: 46
    Min: 22
    Max: 140

    Can anyone explain why I'm getting much better results? Could the invalid checksum have caused conflicts with CF and Catalyst drivers? I can't think of any other reason why I am problem free at these clocks. I am sooooo happy right now.

    Final question. What are the upper limits in regards to core/VRM temps for the HD2900XT? Is there a white paper out there some where? Right now my temps are GPU1/2: 87/85 VRM: 80/77 while running 7 consecutive benchmarks in WiC.

    Thanks guys......
    I did not overclock and have an equal increase in fps in Wic. Probably due to new catalyst 7.12 drivers or new patches. Current Wic version update i think is 1.005.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •