The CDT and copywaza lab

[filmbot]

Then why keep harping? Or even why start in the first place?

If nobody saw the gain, what was that suppose to prove?

[hipro5]

Then why keep harping? Or even why start in the first place?

If nobody saw the gain, what was that suppose to prove?

I have forgot what was the purpose of this thread.....

I think it's about that this "CDT Tweak" works and that OPB is not a cheater.....Yes.....I think that's all about......10sec lower than Copy Waza and OPB is not a cheater.....

[blossa]

I think it's about that this "CDT Tweak" works and that OPB is not a cheater.....Yes.....I think that's all about......10sec lower than Copy Waza and OPB is not a cheater.....

Actually, I am sorry, I think you are a bit out of line here... It seems like some people HAVE gotten better result with this tweak. Maybe there is something to it, maybe a bug, I don't know. Let us find out.

By (atleast extremly closed to) calling OPB a cheater for presenting a tweak that has worked for him, you are VERY close to point out the few people that also has gotten better result with this tweak as cheaters, total n00bs or something like that.

If you think OPB is/was a cheater for other reason, then that is not what the thread is about.

As a reminder (not only to hipro) here is a copy of the topic:

The CDT and copywaza lab

Regards / blossa - who is reading this thread to MAYBE find a good tweak.

[hipro5]

.....It seems like some people HAVE gotten better result with this tweak.

Hmmmmm.......Name ONE (except OPB) please with C2D.......ONLY ONE....

[blossa]

Hmmmmm.......Name ONE (except OPB) please with C2D.......ONLY ONE....

Me?

I think the 'problem' is that you think of this as 'OPB CDT-tweak'. If you looked at it more like 'maybe someone has come close to find a better CW than I use today' I think it would be easier.

I also gained a few seconds trying to do this. If I actually did the CDT or a kind of CW, I do not know. I know it is better than the cw I learned a year ago or so, that is good enought for me.

Last post from me in this thread. Back to topic.

[hipro5]

Me?

I think the 'problem' is that you think of this as 'OPB CDT-tweak'. If you looked at it more like 'maybe someone has come close to find a better CW than I use today' I think it would be easier.

I also gained a few seconds trying to do this. If I actually did the CDT or a kind of CW, I do not know. I know it is better than the cw I learned a year ago or so, that is good enought for me.

Last post from me in this thread. Back to topic.

FIRSTLY: DON'T count me......count only other's oppinions/tests.....

Now.....You claim that you ACTUALLY see "the gain" out of it ONE YEAR AGO....Right?.....SO you KNOW the "whole CDT Tweak" and NOT "half of it".....
People here trying to find out/be told the "WHOLE CDT Tweak" (if any!) MANY DAYS (more than a month I think) and NONE is saying (knowing!).......
SO IF YOU claim that it has worked for you A YEAR AGO and you know the FULL "CDT Tweak", then WHY don't you say it to the other guys who are testing day by day spending their time/days doing nothing?.....

ALSO IF people here don't know the "FULL CDT tweak", why they are STILL TESTING something that it'll give them shi(f)t?....

In GENERAL now and to whom is conserned: SPREAD out the "FULL CDT Tweek" (if any) OR BUST.....

I DON'T see any point for people trying and trying and trying and spending their precius time/hours/days, only to make runs of a "half CDT Tweak" and do nothing.....

Do something NOW OR close this thread coz it's useless......

.

[massman]

FIRSTLY: DON'T count me......count only other's oppinions/tests.....

Now.....You claim that you ACTUALLY see "the gain" out of it ONE YEAR AGO....Right?.....SO you KNOW the "whole CDT Tweak" and NOT "half of it".....
People here trying to find out/be told the "WHOLE CDT Tweak" (if any!) MANY DAYS (more than a month I think) and NONE is saying (knowing!).......
SO IF YOU claim that it has worked for you A YEAR AGO and you know the FULL "CDT Tweak", then WHY don't you say it to the other guys who are testing day by day spending their time/days doing nothing?.....

ALSO IF people here don't know the "FULL CDT tweak", why they are STILL TESTING something that it'll give them shi(f)t?....

In GENERAL now and to whom is conserned: SPREAD out the "FULL CDT Tweek" (if any) OR BUST.....

I DON'T see any point for people trying and trying and trying and spending their precius time/hours/days, only to make runs of a "half CDT Tweak" and do nothing.....

Do something NOW OR close this thread coz it's useless......

.

Useless to you !

C'mon, George, there's more in benching than just applying the tweaks everyone knows and bench ahead. Some people are willing to test every theory regardless if it's a true tweak or not. As far as I know, this tweaks was developped in five(!) years time. Why do you expect results in only a month? On the one hand, i'd like to know the tweak entirely, on the other hand, I just want to find it out together with the people who are contributing to this thread. Kevin may or may not post the entire tweak, purely as a bencher, I don't mind. Giving the hint is more important than explaning the full tweak, to me.

I know this thread is not your favourite one and I fully respect that. But please, please respect the enthousiasm of the users who just want to spend time on this .

[massman]

I have forgot what was the purpose of this thread.....

I think it's about that this "CDT Tweak" works and that OPB is not a cheater.....Yes.....I think that's all about......10sec lower than Copy Waza and OPB is not a cheater.....

Then you're wrong .

Like I've asked in the previous thread, keep the OPB trash talk out of this, please

[kiwi]

Then why keep harping? Or even why start in the first place?

If nobody saw the gain, what was that suppose to prove?

I think he is saying that 0.xx seconds is within margin of error for 32M time.