Wow intel boys to lazy to do some search
All the info is right here on these forums just put of those special glasses
look at this thread for instance
Phenom totally destroys an Q6600 with GTX, with a budget gfx cards and same cpu clock in the game test -->5000 vs 4700
Ylike said put of those glasses...
Last edited by BeardyMan; 11-17-2007 at 11:43 AM.
Why dont you show us. Because its not there and you just troll? You keep calling others fanboys and trolls. Yet you are the one failing to deliver any of your claims.Originally Posted by BeardyMan
Wow intel boys to lazy to do some search
All the info is right here on these forums just put of those special glasses
Last edited by Shintai; 11-17-2007 at 11:45 AM.
Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
Well I agree part of it was AMD, since they only showed SpecFP rates as bench. However some fansboys went nuts and made that into 40-50% lead in IPC in everything. And suddenly we had a period where "average xtremeer" also started to believe it.
Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
troll = shintaisme?
nah not my cup of tea
and read my edit, that's what i call pwned!
Q6600 @ 2.4GHz; 2GB, 8800GTX
Quote:
PCMarkSuite 4973 PCMarks
Memories Suite 4445
TV and Movies Suite 4154
Gaming Suite 4706
Music Suite 4478
Communications Suite 4138
Productivity Suite 4570
HDD Test Suite 4275
Now looking back to the startpost and it's gaming score
SURPRISE!!!5077 with an HD3870,
you fail to read and to understand it seems
Last edited by BeardyMan; 11-17-2007 at 11:49 AM.
LOL, just like a 2900XT is faster than a 8800GTX right? (Cept in futuremark benches) Also you sure they run on the same OS?troll = shintaisme?
nah not my cup of tea
and read my edit, that's what i call pwned!
I love how you "pwn" yourself.
Last edited by Shintai; 11-17-2007 at 11:51 AM.
Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
I beg to differ, your screenshot shows "Ganged mode disabled", i.e. unganged mode enabled and that means 2x64bit not 1x128. Explanation is here:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=343
However that should be the best option for K10, I dont care if some bandwidth benches will suffer from decreasing scores, overall performance in a multithreaded environment should be better with unganged mode.
cheers
Opteron
Last edited by Opteron146; 11-17-2007 at 11:53 AM.
I love how you try to deny the factsLOL, just like a 2900XT is faster than a 8800GTX right? (Cept in futuremark benches) Also you sure they run on the same OS?
I love how you "pwn" yourself.
Those numbers that you like to use, have owned you big time
BeardyMan, how about we wait for some REAL game benches before calling Kentsfield... 'pwned' in gaming. You know, real games... like Crysis.
I have a sneaking suspicion, come the 19th... the only one getting 'pwned' will be yourself.
Yep.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&postcount=49
Are for real or a mkt bot ?Wow intel boys to lazy to do some search
All the info is right here on these forums just put of those special glasses
look at this thread for instance
Phenom totally destroys an Q6600 with GTX, with a budget gfx cards and same cpu clock in the game test -->5000 vs 4700
Ylike said put of those glasses...
deny the facts?I love how you try to deny the facts
Those numbers that you like to use, have owned you big time
look at Barcelona numbers!!!!!! they have been out for a while and we have seen many phenom numbers popping up. and they all point to the K10 being SLOWER than intel. in all real life benches.
CPU: Intel Core i7 3930K @ 4.5GHz
Mobo: Asus Rampage IV Extreme
RAM: 32GB (8x4GB) Patriot Viper EX @ 1866mhz
GPU: EVGA GTX Titan (1087Boost/6700Mem)
Physx: Evga GTX 560 2GB
Sound: Creative XFI Titanium
Case: Modded 700D
PSU: Corsair 1200AX (Fully Sleeved)
Storage: 2x120GB OCZ Vertex 3's in RAID 0 + WD 600GB V-Raptor + Seagate 1TB
Cooling: XSPC Raystorm, 2x MCP 655's, FrozenQ Warp Drive, EX360+MCR240+EX120 Rad's
Could you link this please, I have yet to see such information.funny thing is that there are results at nearly stock voltage where phenoms runs at 3300mhz...
it becomes problematic soon.
Why don't we all simply ignore beardyman... he's obviously a relative of Sharikou.
If we all ignore what he says...he wouldn't have anything to say now would he?
Asus P5B-D WiFi
E6300 L626 @ 3.2@ 1.32V
EVGA 7900GTX
Big Typhoon Air cooling
Crucial Ballistix 2x1GB Anniversary
320GB SeagateSATA
Enermax 460W PS
But where is the fun in that?
Makes sense
Not too lazy... just wowed... the burden of proof is on you.Wow intel boys to lazy to do some search
All the info is right here on these forums just put of those special glasses
look at this thread for instance
Phenom totally destroys an Q6600 with GTX, with a budget gfx cards and same cpu clock in the game test -->5000 vs 4700
Ylike said put of those glasses...
Phenom slower clock for clock...
http://www.xcpus.com/forums/cpus-mai...ce-crysis.html
Phenom slower than a FSB crippled Q6700:
http://www.ocworkbench.com/2007/giga...0FX-DQ6/b1.htm
Phenom does not overclock well:
http://my.ocworkbench.com/bbs/showth...threadid=68863
This in fairly good agreement with such reviews as:
http://www.hardwarezone.com/articles...?cid=2&id=2411
http://www.techreport.com/articles.x/13224
and of course Anands predictions: http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...oc.aspx?i=3092
Last edited by JumpingJack; 11-17-2007 at 02:58 PM.
I just go a Q6600 for $234.00 Yesterday.. That's VALUE...
ʇɐɥʇ ǝʞıl pɐǝɥ ɹnoʎ ƃuıuɹnʇ ǝq ʇ,uop
Fud.
The true potencial can only be seen when oficial release come.
AMD has released so much information, this is about what we have. I don't necessarily disagree though, it is scant... but all the indicators, from Anands preivew to Techreport's runs, to the OCWorkbench data point in the same direction... clock for clock Phenom will come up short to the 65 nm Kentsfield and won't be competitive to Yorksfield.
Of course, we will be treated to canned benchmark data on launch day anyway.... if rumors hold.
i'm not quite sure what to think about the memory performance we've seen in several benchmarks.
barcelona/phenom should be a monster in memory benchmarks, but somehow it's only on par with athlon x2's... makes me wonder what's wrong there :F
1. Asus P5Q-E / Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @~3612 MHz (8,5x425) / 2x2GB OCZ Platinum XTC (PC2-8000U, CL5) / EVGA GeForce GTX 570 / Crucial M4 128GB, WD Caviar Blue 640GB, WD Caviar SE16 320GB, WD Caviar SE 160GB / be quiet! Dark Power Pro P7 550W / Thermaltake Tsunami VA3000BWA / LG L227WT / Teufel Concept E Magnum 5.1 // SysProfile
2. Asus A8N-SLI / AMD Athlon 64 4000+ @~2640 MHz (12x220) / 1024 MB Corsair CMX TwinX 3200C2, 2.5-3-3-6 1T / Club3D GeForce 7800GT @463/1120 MHz / Crucial M4 64GB, Hitachi Deskstar 40GB / be quiet! Blackline P5 470W
Can you run the test again in 64 Bit and IMC gangend mode?
Yep, it is very odd.... unless the memory benchmark is some sort of averaged memory performance of main memory, L3, L2, and L1 peformance with latency added in....
This reminds me of a thread I started about Intel's strategy once phenom drops: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=158609
I think in spite of the lacklustre performance from AMD, Intel could further hurt AMD's release with surprise price-drops in the kentsfield range of products. This should also allow the newly released penryns to sit comfortably above their cousins, price-wise. We might just see $200 quadcores from Intel.
If it doesn't happen after Phenom launch, expect it to happen when the X3's launch.
lol now i get it what BeardyMan means.... that PCMark Vantage score... uh yeah makes real sense that a 3870 is faster then a gtx...
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks