It sounds good anyway
Why should I use 4:5 divider? Isn't the 1:1 better (more efficient)?
It sounds good anyway
Why should I use 4:5 divider? Isn't the 1:1 better (more efficient)?
P5E bios:0107¶ E6750@3.6@1,45V ¶ Asus SilentKnight ¶ T800 2*1Gb@4-4-3-4@2,0V ¶ Asus X1950pro ¶ Aurora570 ¶ ZM500-HPS modular ¶ Raptor 74Gb ADFD ¶ G5+G15 ¶ Belinea 102035W
I have always been "divider challenged".
That said a cpu running at 3.6 (3600) with a 4:5 divider applied would have the RAM running at 2.8 or 2800.
Is this correct?
And yes 1:1 is better Zophet.
sparx
Current build:
(10-2012)
Asus P8 Z77 V Pro
I5 3750K
G.Skill 2 x 4 gig Ripjaws 1800 Dimms
Noctua nh-D14
Samsung 830 128 ssd
West Dig 500 gig Black HD
Corsair 500r case
2 Samsung dvd burners
On board video for now
Win 7 pro
Old Rig: Asus P5wDH E6600 @ 3.6 on air from 2006 build
You have to apply the divider ratio to the fsb speed, not the total clock speed. 9x400 will yield different available memory speeds than 8x450.Originally Posted by Sparx
I have always been "divider challenged".
That said a cpu running at 3.6 (3600) with a 4:5 divider applied would have the RAM running at 2.8 or 2800.
Is this correct?
And yes 1:1 is better Zophet.
sparx
2600K | Maximus IV Formula | 12G Corsair 1600 C8 | 2x 6950 | Coolermaster Scout
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks