MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 3883

Thread: *Official Retail G0 Q6600 Overclocking Thread*

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    North Yorkshire
    Posts
    422
    Quote Originally Posted by twilyth View Post
    It's at least at 1.375 but might be one or 2 ticks higher - definitely under 1.4. Speed fan seems to be accurate since i have the temp alarm set to 60c and it goes off whenever speedfan indicates temp2 is above that

    Temp2 is speedfans designation for readings from a particular sensor. It seems that it's using the sensor for the north bridge. I'm running the memory at a little under 1066 but I guess the increase in voltage is what's causing the problem - although I'm still a little unclear on the relationship between vcore and the NB. I've read some stuff about NB but it's still pretty fuzzy.

    btw - using AS5 for the paste.
    speedfan is not accurate for coretemp on a quad as far as I know unless the latest beta has resolved it. Up to now it works on a tjunction of 85c unless you calibrate it so it will be -15c out. Try this and post what the temps are http://www.cpuid.com/pcwizard.php - install,run then minimise - it will post temps in top of screen. I run 3.6 with 1.4v real - idle 35c - load 62c using air cooling. I also stick a little 40mm fan on the NB from habit on the P5W - probably doesnt need it but every little helps-lol!
    Last edited by sesdave; 11-10-2007 at 09:44 AM.
    Q6600 - L729A959
    VID1.2625 @3.72GHz (465x8) 1.4625v(BIOS)
    P5K Premium (0702 BIOS)
    Win7 Ultimate x64
    Ultima-90
    4x1GB Ballistix 8500C5 @ 1166 5-5-5-12 2.2v
    MSI 5770 Hawk 1030/1330 - 1.25v
    2 x Hitachi T7K500 320MB - Matrix RAID 0/1
    Hiper Type R 680w

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    286
    Quote Originally Posted by sesdave View Post
    speedfan is not accurate for coretemp on a quad as far as I know unless the latest beta has resolved it.
    The latest beta resolves this issue. Running 4.34 beta 34 and temps are reported correctly without the need to apply offset (in advanced options).

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    North Yorkshire
    Posts
    422
    Quote Originally Posted by ~aoe~ View Post
    The latest beta resolves this issue. Running 4.34 beta 34 and temps are reported correctly without the need to apply offset (in advanced options).
    about time - lol! I have got to like PC wizard so I will stick with that.
    Q6600 - L729A959
    VID1.2625 @3.72GHz (465x8) 1.4625v(BIOS)
    P5K Premium (0702 BIOS)
    Win7 Ultimate x64
    Ultima-90
    4x1GB Ballistix 8500C5 @ 1166 5-5-5-12 2.2v
    MSI 5770 Hawk 1030/1330 - 1.25v
    2 x Hitachi T7K500 320MB - Matrix RAID 0/1
    Hiper Type R 680w

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •