Crysis CPU benchmark: QX6850 VS QX9650 VS PhenomX4

[Shintai]

Yeah but being disappointed about an unreleased product is unneeded
makes no sense.

But this is Barcelona all over. Seriously, we heard one excuse after the other from the utter desperate fanboys. Yet its proven wrong again and again and again and again!

These products dont radically change before release. Their performance doesnt suddenly climb by a good amrgin or even a low. They never did the last 30 yaers or more!

[mrcmtl]

its funny how the min and max fps of each cpu is the same even the two last digit for every run...

[Shintai]

its funny how the min and max fps of each cpu is the same even the two last digit for every run...

Because its GPU limited for those.

[red]

http://news.expreview.com/2007-10-29...0532d6599.html
E6850 min:~30 FPS at frame 196
QX6850/QX9650 min:~29 FPS
Phenom min: ~8 FPS

[knightwolf654]

great, it works! but isn't that what you'd expect from a multi-billion dollar company? or is there something special about amd

sry let me re phrase. its a quad core, it 9/10 will be cheaper then intel and is faster then what i have.

THAT is all i need

[mrcmtl]

Because its GPU limited for those.

i know that its gpu limited but just try and test it out with whatever game...run it 5 times and see if fraps or something gives you the same max and min everytime.

[RAMMAN]

this is crysis were talking about.how can it not be gpu limited at any setting?

[Cooper]

This thread is going nowhere...