AMD Fanboy uses Core 2 Duo Benchmark to back up his love for AMD...
ooooooookay
20 Logs on the fire for WCG:i7 920@2.8
X3220@3.0
X3220@2.4
E8400@4.05
E6600@2.4
All talk, no proof, useless. Anyway time to get back to the topic.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe you two ladies can do this in a pm and save the thread.![]()
I doubt that will make a wee bit of a difference considering these tests were run with a single card. HT bandwith is not the problem here, AMD has that in droves even at 1.6ghz NB clock, certainly more than Intel's FSB. The problem is that the processor is not computingfast enough, all the bandwith in the world won't fix that.
Can we please stop the epeen contest please, we get it...you're rich....you have sick hardware, good for you.
Gigabyte MA790X-UD4P//Dell Latitude D620
Phenom II BE 940//Core 2 Duo 2.0Ghz
2x2GB OCZ Reaper//1GB PC5400
640GB WD Blue//80gb 7200 rpm hdd
Radeon 4850//Geforce 7300 Go
This thread has been somewhat sidetracked... i too dont understand why this 'rich guy' is posting Intel Super pi benches when hes supposted to be backing up Amd??
CPU: Intel Q6600 @ 3600Mhz 24/7
GFX: eVGA 8800GTS SSC 512MB
RAM: 4GB Corsair Dominator PC2-8500
MB: DFI LP LT X48-T2R
HDD:150GB WD Raptor X
PSU: Thermaltake Toughpower 1000W
Screen: Dell 2407WFP
Omg most people are still blind. I was thinkink my previous post will open eyes to some people, well here is again, look at this pictures:
http://www.expreview.com/img/news/071028/Crysis_k10.jpg
http://www.expreview.com/img/news/07...sis_qx9650.jpg
http://www.expreview.com/img/news/07...sis_qx6850.jpg
http://www.expreview.com/img/news/07...ysis_e6850.jpg
Something strange or no ? Or im the only one in entire internet world to see this diference in minimum fps.![]()
all the flaming over one piss poor comparison is about as irritating as getting pounded in the poopshoot by ron jeremy wearing a sandpaper condom. it all comes down to this: can the average joe buy a phenom or a yorkfield right now? nope didnt think so.
until the chips are available at retail, take these results with a grain of salt as many more of them will follow until the chips are actually released. fwiw its nice to see amd in the same ballpark as intel even if the testing was flawed (gpu bound)
Main System: Core i7 860-Kingston LoVo DDR3 1866-eVGA P55FTW--2x Gigabyte GTX460's in SLI-Intel X25-M 80GB-WD Caviar Black 1TB 32MB Cache HDD-Razer Barracuda AC-1-Corsair TX750-Samsung Dual Layer DVD Burner-Pioneer Dual Layer DVD Burner-Cooler Master CM690-II Advanced-Thermaltake Frio
Secondary System: Core i3 530-eVGA H55-2x2GB Crucial DDR3 D9KPT -BFG GTX260-500GB Seagate 7200.12 HDD-Corsair HX620-NEC Dual Layer DVD Burner-Antec 300-Cooler Master Hyper 212+
I'd prefer Lassie w/ a Lambskin.
Bruno's Junker
OPTY 165 @ 2.9G
ASSROCK 939Dual Sata2
512mb Xerox Samsung PC2100
512mb Corsair PC3200 Value Ram
Ancient HDD, CDRW, DVD and Floppy
Antique Gateway ATX Tower (cover not included)
Once again, people are jumping to conclusions. These results aren't just fishy, but SUPER fishy!
In particular the minimum FPS for Phenom.
There is no reason whatsoever, from a hardware perspective, that the Phenom should have such a mediocre minimum FPS score.
Something is definitely amiss.
This bench is complete fraud. No point discussing it.
"To exist in this vast universe for a speck of time is the great gift of life. Our tiny sliver of time is our gift of life. It is our only life. The universe will go on, indifferent to our brief existence, but while we are here we touch not just part of that vastness, but also the lives around us. Life is the gift each of us has been given. Each life is our own and no one else's. It is precious beyond all counting. It is the greatest value we have. Cherish it for what it truly is."
nuff said.
Bookmarks