Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: [First Look] NVIDIA 3-way SLI

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    386

    [First Look] NVIDIA 3-way SLI

    Havnt seen this posted so...

    [First Look] NVIDIA 3-way SLI







    To infinity, and beyond! (Azza was taken )

  2. #2
    The PhotoCHOPer
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    961
    Just what I need for crysis :P
    Silver Bullet VII

    Corsair 750D | Corsair AX 850W | Core i7 2600K | Thermalright Venomous X | Asus Maximus IV Extreme B3
    eVGA GTX680 SLI | Crucial Ballistix Sport 16GB | Intel 530 240GB | 2 x WD RED 3TB in RAID 1 | LG BluRay | 3 x 2413WFP

  3. #3
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    nVidia tried Quad SLI, and it failed horrible. Now AMD and NVidia gonna try the tripple. That I bet my rear end will fail aswell. There can only be so much space between the lowend and highend.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,014
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    nVidia tried Quad SLI, and it failed horrible. Now AMD and NVidia gonna try the tripple. That I bet my rear end will fail aswell. There can only be so much space between the lowend and highend.
    you can't blaime nvidia for teh failure...wer were the boards to support it fully?

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2
    There really isn't much need for a triple setup yet. The gains are just too little for the cost. I'd say that this will be for those people with lots of money to spend, who either don't know how little they'll gain or don't care. I can see people getting a tripple setup just because they don't know better.
    AMD X2 6000+ @3.16 Ghz 1.4v
    Gigabyte GA-M61P-S3
    Crucial Ballistix DDR2-800 @904 5-5-5-15 2.2v
    XFX 7900GS @540/870
    X-Fi Xtreme Gamer

  6. #6
    all outta gum
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    3,390
    Stop wasting R&D money on such oddities... we want new high-end GPU now!
    www.teampclab.pl
    MOA 2009 Poland #2, AMD Black Ops 2010, MOA 2011 Poland #1, MOA 2011 EMEA #12

    Test bench: empty

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,125
    Quote Originally Posted by BeardyMan View Post
    you can't blaime nvidia for teh failure...wer were the boards to support it fully?
    The lack of driver support of any kind is what mostly killed it

    Unfortunately, both CF and SLI are very primitive in how they're implemented, in that essentially you need specific profiles just to run those games properly and if no profiles are around, it can actually hurt performance

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,014
    Quote Originally Posted by zerazax View Post
    The lack of driver support of any kind is what mostly killed it

    Unfortunately, both CF and SLI are very primitive in how they're implemented, in that essentially you need specific profiles just to run those games properly and if no profiles are around, it can actually hurt performance
    yeah ofcourse, but wich mainboard from high end manufacters could actually feed 4 of those wattagewhores

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    141
    On what board is he testing the picture says P355??????

    And a noob in the first picture has put the 3way sli bridge wrong.
    And why didn't they tested also a 2 card setup so you can see the improvements from 2 to 3 cards.
    Last edited by Disaster_Master; 10-29-2007 at 12:27 PM.

    To be a professional noob/idiot
    * Default factory speed is for noobs.
    * Everything must go above the speed that the factory consider safe.
    * Everything for more performance
    * Everything fits, and everything can be broken.
    * Most problems can be fixed by adding a volt or two.
    * Post things in your signature that makes no sense at all.


  10. #10
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    546

  11. #11
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    170
    Board with 4 x 16xPCIE, and they have put it in closest one.
    SLi bridge is made for slots 1, 2, 4 or 1, 3, 4. (well i think so :P)

  12. #12
    X.I.P
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,964
    Quote Originally Posted by Disaster_Master View Post
    On what board is he testing the picture says P355??????

    And a noob in the first picture has put the 3way sli bridge wrong.
    And why didn't they tested also a 2 card setup so you can see the improvements from 2 to 3 cards.
    P335 is the PCB board of 8800 ultra and gtx

  13. #13
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    [EU] Latvia, Jelgava
    Posts
    1,689
    Quote Originally Posted by Silver Bullet View Post
    Just what I need for crysis :P
    Teh Crysis doesn't support SLI...yet.

  14. #14
    Wanna look under my kilt?
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Glasgow-ish U.K.
    Posts
    4,396
    wow! What a surprise...its CPU-bottlenecked to hell and back!

    I want to see it ran with some CPU horsepower please!

    I'd also like to see the table clearly!
    Quote Originally Posted by T_M View Post
    Not sure i totally follow anything you said, but regardless of that you helped me come up with a very good idea....
    Quote Originally Posted by soundood View Post
    you sigged that?

    why?
    ______

    Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.

  15. #15
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    3,554
    is it me or are those 3dmark scores juse not as impressive as it should be for 3 cards?

    My Free-DC Stats
    You use IRC and Crunch in Xs WCG team? Join #xs.wcg @ Quakenet

  16. #16
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    >=2.0 scaling for all 2560x1600 tests, looks good to me. Excessive, but it works pretty well when it matters.

    Would also like to see scaling vs. 2-way SLI and scaling with a stronger/OC'd CPU. But there's time of course.

  17. #17
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    703
    3/4-Way CF and SLI is utterly useless for majority of the population who uses < 24" LCDs.

    BUT for those who use the 24"s and 30"s, it's worth it. If you look at default 3DM06 score, it's far from impressive, but high resolution like 1920x1200 or 2560x1600, it definitely looks good. Now add on AA and AF, 3/4-way seems to make sense. I mean, if you're going to blow $1500-2000 on a 30" panel, what's another $1200 on GPUs when your desktop is probably over $3k in price.

    Does anyone NEED to game at those resolutions? Not really, but for those who WANT to game at those resolutions, now they can.
    A wiseman once said, "If Bible proves the existence of God, then comic books prove the existence of Superheros."

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •