Crysis Demo Unveiled, today ... i played it!

**~~OBR~~** · 10-24-2007, 07:52 AM

Official launch date of Single-Player is this friday, if you have a pre-ordered game, you can download it tomorrow ...

But on Computers exhibition Invex in Czech republic (Brno) you can play this Demo now ...

On 24" LCD and only ONE 8800 GTX going demo perfectly on High details (in DX9) ... it is great!

Source of pictures : www.ddworld.cz

**WrigleyVillain** · 10-24-2007, 07:54 AM

Sweet!

**RPGWiZaRD** · 10-24-2007, 08:29 AM

Sounds like they've done a couple of performance optimizations lately then.

Ahh I even forgot about Crysis demo launch on Friday this week and I won't be able to try it out before Sunday. Sux.

Very high details available yet?

**xlink** · 10-24-2007, 08:34 AM

can i get it in a retail store? I work at target(10% off) plus I have a 5$ off coupon(the $1 art disc had a $5 coupon) so I'm looking at around 10 bucks off so i'm wondering.

Plus I need another reason to justify my falling GPA... allready down to 3.7

**[XC] gomeler** · 10-24-2007, 08:54 AM

3.7GPA? That isn't low enough, I'm below a 3.0 albeit at Georgia Tech

Sounds like Crysis won't be the hardware killer we were all expecting but more details are needed like resolution/aa/af. It played decently on my 7900GTO so long as I was outdoors(the MP demo), indoors ran like ass.

**kuhla** · 10-24-2007, 08:59 AM

haha, I'm with [XC] gomeler, under 3.0 is pretty normal for most of the college students I know

demo on friday eh? sounds good, now i just sort of need an upgrade, *waits for 8800GT*

**RPGWiZaRD** · 10-24-2007, 09:29 AM

Originally Posted by [XC] gomeler

Sounds like Crysis won't be the hardware killer we were all expecting but more details are needed like resolution/aa/af. It played decently on my 7900GTO so long as I was outdoors(the MP demo), indoors ran like ass.

I don't think my 7900GTO handled the beta that great really with high details neither indoors nor outdoors.

BTW, any1 know when this beta NDA ends, tomorrow perhaps? or is it never? lol Didn't bother to read through the agreements as usual so.

**Der_KHAN** · 10-24-2007, 09:35 AM

Originally Posted by OBR

On 24" LCD and only ONE 8800 GTX going demo perfectly on High details (in DX9) ... it is great!

are you absolutely sure that its a single gtx?

i play the MP beta on a single 8800GTS 640MB at 630/1000 (which is about equal to the perf of a stock gtx) and i have to use 1152x720 to get acceptable fps. 1920x1200 is 2.7times more pixels its hard to believe that they improved so much on the performance...

**RPGWiZaRD** · 10-24-2007, 09:38 AM

Well seeing how incomplete the BETA actually was I wouldn't be too suprised. Funny seeing the text "Shader's processing" or whatever it it keeps saying on the yellow colored textures the first few secs when you've got ingame.

**xlink** · 10-24-2007, 09:49 AM

Originally Posted by [XC] gomeler

3.7GPA? That isn't low enough, I'm below a 3.0 albeit at Georgia Tech

Sounds like Crysis won't be the hardware killer we were all expecting but more details are needed like resolution/aa/af. It played decently on my 7900GTO so long as I was outdoors(the MP demo), indoors ran like ass.

I'm in a community college because I slacked in high school/I'm cheap(in california CC is only $20 a unit, that's almost free).

I need to keep my GPA up.

**vengance_01** · 10-24-2007, 10:16 AM

xlink thats the way to go. You get the same education through a CC college your first two years because its just general ed bull

. Sits tight for Monday for the launch of the 8800GT's. Quad Core plus an 8800GT, here I come.

**Jumba** · 10-24-2007, 10:16 AM

It's a 24" monitor but who says it's running at full res?

**~~turtletrax~~** · 10-24-2007, 10:37 AM

Originally Posted by Jumba

It's a 24" monitor but who says it's running at full res?

Because he said it looked good

**ANP !!!** · 10-24-2007, 10:38 AM

Good news

. I have the same exact hardwares..
Can someone who's having a GTX and 24",Please test this on 1920x1200 reso

. How does it fare ?

**aiya** · 10-24-2007, 10:41 AM

Originally Posted by Jumba

It's a 24" monitor but who says it's running at full res?

seeing the position of the arm and gun in the pic, it looks about right. i just started playing FarCry so its pretty fresh in my mind

**happychappy** · 10-24-2007, 10:42 AM

Cant wait till Friday

**deathman20** · 10-24-2007, 11:00 AM

Originally Posted by ANP !!!

Good news

. I have the same exact hardwares..
Can someone who's having a GTX and 24",Please test this on 1920x1200 reso

. How does it fare ?

In the beta I know people had GTX's more or less maxed at 1680x1050 wiht everything cranked. GTS's could play at that res with a few details turned to medium respectably all in XP. I run my 2900XT in Vista at 1440x900 and it runs decently well, low to mid 30's, with an occasional drop into the 20's when massive explosions happen all max out as well (no AA).

Truely I couldn't see it not happening surely its running XP and they are getting better performance than Vista currently as well but as well the beta has to have debug drivers running and theres many errors in the console that have been fixed since then as well full dual core or quad wasn't totally utilized in the beta's so we can see some perfromance gain from that as well.

I just can't wait to try DX10 and hopefully the 64-bit exe of the game.

**SKYMTL** · 10-24-2007, 11:11 AM

Either that kid's head is REALLY small....or that isn't 24" monitor....

Looks more like a 32" 1366 x 768 resolution TV to me......

**Der_KHAN** · 10-24-2007, 11:13 AM

Originally Posted by turtletrax

Originally Posted by Jumba

It's a 24" monitor but who says it's running at full res?

Because he said it looked good

well, at least 1440x900 looks very good on my 22" display. you can't even see that its an interpolated image. so i guess a good 24" could do a lower res just as well.

everything below 1440x900 gets real blurry though...

**happychappy** · 10-24-2007, 11:24 AM

Originally Posted by SKYMTL

Either that kid's head is REALLY small....or that isn't 24" monitor....

Looks more like a 32" 1366 x 768 resolution TV to me......

I agree, it just doesn't "look" like a monitor at all

**Bigchrome** · 10-24-2007, 11:25 AM

I can see the aliasing from here.

**JAG87** · 10-24-2007, 11:30 AM

Originally Posted by SKYMTL

Either that kid's head is REALLY small....or that isn't 24" monitor....

Looks more like a 32" 1366 x 768 resolution TV to me......

I agree, that doesn't look like a 24 inch to me. look at the keyboard for the love of god, 24 inchers are the same width of keyboards, while that monitor is way wider. id say you are right, and its 32 inch 720p monitor. shens...

**deathman20** · 10-24-2007, 11:39 AM

Originally Posted by Der_KHAN

well, at least 1440x900 looks very good on my 22" display. you can't even see that its an interpolated image. so i guess a good 24" could do a lower res just as well.

everything below 1440x900 gets real blurry though...

Agreed... while 1280x720 isn't horrible you definatly need to consider AA (if you can) to take up some of the resolution interpolation on the monitor. 1440x900 isn't bad on my screen which is a 24"

**TEDY** · 10-24-2007, 11:43 AM

why it's not on p2p?

**`danny** · 10-24-2007, 12:05 PM

I hope the SP demo is Dx10

Thread: Crysis Demo Unveiled, today ... i played it!

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Rate This Thread

Display

Crysis Demo Unveiled, today ... i played it!

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions