That was during the FX days, and mind you ATi got caught as well(UT2003 anyone? If you don't remember, google it). Infact, I seem to remember not all too long ago ATi's drivers actually detected if you were doing a mip-test on the image quality and actually upped the iq levels. A clever tester discovered it when they noticed the frame rate dropped when they ran the tester when it shouldn't have.
Also, what exactly do you mean NVidia's drivers are freeware... Both companies don't charge you for your drivers, you realize that right?
A market move, yes. It's considered smart business when you have a product line that flops to move away from that name as soon as humanly possible. They did they stick with the HD 2900 name for the pro? Simple, they're the same exact card, it's just ATi's way to sell the rest off.
As for the IQ, ATi(I will NEVER call the R600 amd's project) never had the upper hand in AA. They both only go up to 8x Multi-sampling, and both use almost identical multisampling algorithms. You can bring up the filters, but I'll simply remind you of the fact that it's known to actually lower image quality by a blurring of the image. This is well documented across the web.
Check the beyond3d article on the R600, and you'll find that even they will tell you the 8 series has better image quality on a technical level. Equal AA and Better AF = better image quality.![]()
Bookmarks