Seems To Work For Me !!!
![]()
Seems To Work For Me !!!
![]()
Windows XP Professional
Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 3.0 Ghz (Conroe) OC to 4.0 Ghz
FSB 502.1 X 8 = 4016.24 Voltage:1.5875
Gigabyte GA-X38-DQ6
RAID 0 X 2-36 GB Western Digital Raptor
2GB kit (1GBx2), Ballistix 240-pin DIMM, DDR2 PC2-8500
BFG GeForce 8800 GTX OC 768MB
Thermaltake Mozart Tx Case
Custombuilt Watercooled System Swiftech Pump & Apogee GTX CPU Block / Quad 480 Radiator.
Samsung 245BW 24-Inch Widescreen LCD Monitor.
RIG 1: Asus Rampage Extreme X48
RIG 2: Foxconn BloodRage X58
E8600 Q820A349 @ 4.75Ghz: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=596270
He obviously hasnt tweaked subtimings that well or enabled the right performance options
DDR2 900, this is 100% stable.
Thats Blend @ Priority 9, round off checking enabled.
Tweaked 900 is running damn near his 1205and I will have some stuff up for 500x7 DDR2 1000 4-4-4-10 with tight subtimings... will pull 10k
![]()
So what does it say, does it say I should upgrade my aging P965 Gigabyte GA-965P-S3 mobo or get a better clocking CPU?
Seems to work for me too, P965 isn't that slow!
Edit: this is 100% orthos stable. Edit: there -> http://i24.tinypic.com/jpzddd.jpg
Last edited by OnLine; 10-21-2007 at 06:49 PM.
s754 PCIe; EPoX EP-8NPAJ // Claw 3700+ // 7800GTX // Cors BH-5 1GB // OCZ 520W // WinXP
Never seen RAM speeds measured in TRIAL VERSIONWhats that translate to like 20k MB/s
![]()
s754 PCIe; EPoX EP-8NPAJ // Claw 3700+ // 7800GTX // Cors BH-5 1GB // OCZ 520W // WinXP
Bookmarks