MMM
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 39 of 39

Thread: Intel Preps $35 - $50 Dual-Core Celeron's for Q1 2008

  1. 10-12-2007, 06:00 PM #26
    dinos22
    dinos22 is offline
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    17,242
    Quote Originally Posted by perkam View Post
    Ty AMD

    Perkam
    you're not wrong there
    Team.AU
    Got tube?
    GIGABYTE Australia
    Need a GIGABYTE bios or support?

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 10-12-2007, 06:05 PM #27
    RAW-Raptor22
    RAW-Raptor22 is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    2,144
    Send a message via AIM to RAW-Raptor22 Send a message via MSN to RAW-Raptor22 Send a message via Yahoo to RAW-Raptor22
    Quote Originally Posted by SparkyJJO View Post
    In 2010 I don't think anyone would really want today's dual cores Let alone a celeron!

    Not sure what the purpose of a dual-core celeron is - maybe make the people who buy those $300 dell specials feel like they are in the 21st century?
    Celeron is a celeron, wimpy. IMO.
    The Celeron 420 is the fastest single core CPU ever produced, it beats an FX-57 at almost every bench...
    |-------Conner-------|



    RIP JimmyMoonDog

    2,147,222 F@H Points - My F@H Statistics:
    http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/...e=Conman%5F530
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 10-12-2007, 06:09 PM #28
    MaSell
    MaSell is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    573
    Quote Originally Posted by Raptor22 View Post
    The Celeron 420 is the fastest single core CPU ever produced, it beats an FX-57 at almost every bench...
    I think that Celeron 480 (14x200) is "little" faster


    Quote Originally Posted by AndreYang View Post
    wtf..your cpu is better.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 10-12-2007, 06:27 PM #29
    Cracker
    Cracker is offline
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    388
    I want quad-core Celery!
    Join the XtremeSystems WCG crunching team!
    Register and download the program here.
    Choose the "BOINC" version when prompted then install.
    Questions? Click here or here.
    It's for great causes like CURING CANCER, MS, AIDS, and other stuff you should hope you never get.
    Plus it's the best system stability test ever invented!


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 10-12-2007, 07:09 PM #30
    RAW-Raptor22
    RAW-Raptor22 is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    2,144
    Send a message via AIM to RAW-Raptor22 Send a message via MSN to RAW-Raptor22 Send a message via Yahoo to RAW-Raptor22
    Quote Originally Posted by Cracker View Post
    I want quad-core Celery!
    Nat for a few more years....
    |-------Conner-------|



    RIP JimmyMoonDog

    2,147,222 F@H Points - My F@H Statistics:
    http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/...e=Conman%5F530
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 10-12-2007, 07:25 PM #31
    bypolar
    bypolar is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    358
    Celerons are a dead name in the market these days. Unless intel does something just like this.

    good to see they are moving all the market platforms ahead just means AMD will release a multi core sempron some time soon hopefully.
    Asrock Extreme3 Gen3
    Intel 2500K @5.0 1.52V
    Thermaltake Frio
    4-4GB Kinston HyperX 1600's
    1-256Gb Crucial M4 SSD
    Xion 1000W (Made by Superflower)
    2-Evga GTX570 in SLI
    Antec DF-30
    Windows 7 pro 64 bit

    Just a regular guy, Not Xtreme!!

    If I sound STUPID!! it is because I am.

    Not everyone can be a Genius!!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 10-12-2007, 08:29 PM #32
    xlink
    xlink is offline
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    HD0
    Posts
    2,646
    can't they just make a 2mb l2 cache single core celeron with hyperthreading for around $50?
    those'd perform better and be cheaper to make
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 10-13-2007, 12:07 AM #33
    ziddey
    ziddey is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    ithaca, ny
    Posts
    2,431
    Send a message via AIM to ziddey
    c2d seems to scale appropriately downwards from 4mb to 2mb to 1mb. but 512k? another willamette??
    E8400 8x500=4000 | ABIT IP35-E
    2x2GB Tracer PC2-6400 1:1 500MHz 5-5-5-15 2.0V
    Galaxy 8800GT 800/2000/1100 1.3V | 80GB X25-M G2 + 1.5TB 7200.11 | XFiXG
    Fuzion | MCW60 | DDC2+Petra | Coolrad22T+BIP1

    Merom 13x133=1733 1MB L2 0.950V
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 10-13-2007, 12:25 AM #34
    Epsilon84
    Epsilon84 is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    658
    Quote Originally Posted by ziddey View Post
    c2d seems to scale appropriately downwards from 4mb to 2mb to 1mb. but 512k? another willamette??
    I doubt it. All things considered it should be about on par with K8 IPC wise. So unless you wanna suggest K8 is a Willamette...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 10-13-2007, 12:27 AM #35
    xlink
    xlink is offline
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    HD0
    Posts
    2,646
    Quote Originally Posted by Epsilon84 View Post
    I doubt it. All things considered it should be about on par with K8 IPC wise. So unless you wanna suggest K8 is a Willamette...
    well in a lot of things the pentium dual cores loose to the K8s when it comes to performance/clock so basically...

    they're celerons... CELERY
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 10-13-2007, 05:08 AM #36
    Epsilon84
    Epsilon84 is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    658
    Quote Originally Posted by xlink View Post
    well in a lot of things the pentium dual cores loose to the K8s when it comes to performance/clock so basically...

    they're celerons... CELERY
    ???

    In the reviews I've seen, the Pentium Es have around a 10% edge in IPC over K8.

    Considering Conroe-Ls have been benched against an FX-57 and come out on top clock for clock (just) I don't see how a dual core version would fail to match the IPC of K8?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 10-13-2007, 05:25 AM #37
    Jacky
    Jacky is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    532
    oh and don't forget their much more advanced SSE abilites and nice overclockability.
    Quote Originally Posted by freecableguy
    the idiots out number us 10,000:1
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 10-13-2007, 05:55 AM #38
    Den Leiw
    Den Leiw is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    USSR
    Posts
    281
    Well now if they released those Celerons for Socket 478, I could happily update my old Pentium IV rig
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 10-13-2007, 08:06 AM #39
    The_Beast
    The_Beast is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    957
    Send a message via AIM to The_Beast Send a message via Yahoo to The_Beast
    Quote Originally Posted by knightwolf654 View Post
    agreed, this war continues to get better
    soon it will be $75 quad cores
    :drool: I wish :drool:
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules