x264 video encoding benchmark

[STEvil]

noticed you've got my 5120's listed as 4+4=8, they're woodys not clovers

[njkid32]

Yes, and I believe the model Yorkfield I have is a Q9350.

[graysky]

@STE - my bad... fixed now will update soon
@njkid32 - cool, also fixed

[graysky]

@njkid32 - any chance of you repeating the benchmark @ the processor's stock settings?

[njkid32]

I can this weekend if you'd like. Its out of my computer right now and I'm waiting on boards to arrive

[graysky]

Cool man - I'll watch for it

[Major_A]

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 67.80 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 68.55 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 68.00 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 68.42 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 68.55 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 16.58 fps, 1826.37 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 16.86 fps, 1826.38 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 16.81 fps, 1826.38 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 16.80 fps, 1826.38 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 16.81 fps, 1826.38 kb/s

[graysky]

Thanks for the result... updated!

[graysky]

I can this weekend if you'd like. Its out of my computer right now and I'm waiting on boards to arrive

You get your new boards?

[Ashraf]

CPU: Intel Core 2 Q9350 ES @ 2.33GHz (stock)
OS: Windows Vista Ultimate x64

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 126.54 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 78.95 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 80.83 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 79.63 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 82.32 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 20.24 fps, 1829.42 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 20.47 fps, 1829.36 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 20.44 fps, 1829.34 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 20.34 fps, 1829.11 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 20.44 fps, 1829.28 kb/s

CPU: Intel Core 2 Q9350 ES @ 3.00GHz (overclocked)
OS: Windows Vista Ultimate x64

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 165.59 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 168.85 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 169.10 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 168.85 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 166.83 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 45.56 fps, 1829.36 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 45.47 fps, 1829.38 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 45.37 fps, 1829.12 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 45.43 fps, 1829.39 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 45.46 fps, 1829.50 kb/s

[graysky]

Thanks for the data, Ashraf. Any chance you can repeat the stock result tests? Something must have been up with them since you got around 126 fps initially, but 80 in subsequent passes.

[JVguest]

Nice benchmark.. here's mine, not bad for an Allendale.

Gigabyte P965-DS3, 430 fsb x 7, 3.01 GHz Allendale, 1075 MHz DDR2 5-5-5-10, Windows XP pro SP2



---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 88.70 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 89.05 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 88.62 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 88.77 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 88.63 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 21.27 fps, 1826.38 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 21.37 fps, 1826.38 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 21.36 fps, 1826.37 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 21.32 fps, 1826.38 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 21.31 fps, 1826.37 kb/s

[Major_A]

Not to steal your thread graysky but...
JVguest you know you can just hit the Print Screen button and then paste in paint it will be your Screenshot? That way you don't have to use a program with annoying messages all over the image.

[JVguest]

Not to steal your thread graysky but...
JVguest you know you can just hit the Print Screen button and then paste in paint it will be your Screenshot? That way you don't have to use a program with annoying messages all over the image.

No, I've stripped my Win Xp install down. I'm sure I can find another program to use though.

[weescott]

Q9550 @ Q9450

X38 (Asus Maximus Formula)

XP Pro SP2

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 158.77 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 159.68 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 159.68 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 158.78 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 159.23 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 42.90 fps, 1829.19 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 42.94 fps, 1829.36 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 42.86 fps, 1829.41 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 42.89 fps, 1829.26 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 42.87 fps, 1829.11 kb/s

And same CPU at 425 x 8
ram 1020mhz 5-5-5-15

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 198.46 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 198.12 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 197.76 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 198.48 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 198.12 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 54.47 fps, 1829.44 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 54.47 fps, 1829.47 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 54.42 fps, 1829.45 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 54.50 fps, 1829.10 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 54.39 fps, 1829.51 kb/s

[graysky]

Cool man, thanks for the results... I'll add them to the table tomorrow evening.

[graysky]

Updated the Intel table. It now contains several Yorkfield ES chips including:

Xeon E5330 (Dual board)
Q9550
Q9350

[Hachi_Roku]

Q6600 posted @433x9 3900 scored the same as York @425x8 3400
altho different mem speed and timings

[Mindmaster]

E6300@3.4GHz, 7x485MHz, P35, 5-5-5-15@485MHz, Win Vista 64

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 93.17 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 94.25 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 94.39 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 94.37 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 94.41 fps, 1850.89 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 23.23 fps, 1826.37 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 23.27 fps, 1826.38 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 23.22 fps, 1826.37 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 23.25 fps, 1826.37 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 23.25 fps, 1826.37 kb/s

[nicepun]

Xeon X3210 @ 3.6Ghz (8x450)

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 188.13 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 191.00 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 191.34 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 191.99 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 192.98 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 50.29 fps, 1829.52 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 50.44 fps, 1829.52 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 50.44 fps, 1829.21 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 50.35 fps, 1829.28 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 50.33 fps, 1829.41 kb/s

[fallwind]

QX9650@3GHz


---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 169.59 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 168.58 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 169.59 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 170.37 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 169.35 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 45.32 fps, 1829.08 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 45.23 fps, 1829.54 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 45.32 fps, 1829.33 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 45.24 fps, 1829.46 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 45.45 fps, 1829.24 kb/s


and at 4.2GHz

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 227.05 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 229.86 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 227.97 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 229.86 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS1.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 228.45 fps, 1850.94 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 62.78 fps, 1829.14 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 62.88 fps, 1829.53 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 62.99 fps, 1829.08 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 62.67 fps, 1829.14 kb/s

---------- RUN5PASS2.LOG
encoded 1749 frames, 62.82 fps, 1829.50 kb/s

[tet5uo]

Wow that Yorkie tears that bench a new one!

here's my humble e6850...

[graysky]

@nicepun: what are your mem timings and mem core speed (after divider) like 5-5-5-15 @ 900 MHz? Also what O/S?

@fallwind: wow dude, that 4.2 GHz result is pretty amazing. Just as fast as the 8 core (dual) xeon x5355 machines. Where were your mem timings and mem core speed (after divider) for the 9x333 run? Also what O/S u running?

@tet5uo: what o/s u running?

[tet5uo]

I'm running XP 32 bit.

[fallwind]

Sorry bout that. I'm running XP Pro SP2 and the stock speed run was done with the RAM at 1066MHz 5-5-5-15.