Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: x264 Benchmark

  1. #1
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    4,743

    x264 Benchmark

    http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=442

    I think it's ideal for a benchmark because the application (x264.exe) reports fairly accurate compression results (in frames per second) for each pass of the video encoding process, and it uses multi-core processors very efficiently.

    You'll notice that the whole thing is pretty simple since I have no programming skills to speak of. The test basically, consists of the needed executables, the video file, the AVISynth script, and the DGIndex project file. They are all driven by a batch file that'll kick off the x264 encode, and write the results to text file. That makes it easy for you to upload the results, together with your machine specifications for comparison.

    The video content itself is not important. It is just a DVD-formatted, progressive MPEG-2 stream running at 23.976 fps with a resolution of 720x480. The important thing is that all those participating in this test use the same clip, the same version of x264, the same version of Avisynth etc. so that the results are comparable.


    Asus Z9PE-D8 WS with 64GB of registered ECC ram.|Dell 30" LCD 3008wfp:7970 video card

    LSI series raid controller
    SSDs: Crucial C300 256GB
    Standard drives: Seagate ST32000641AS & WD 1TB black
    OSes: Linux and Windows x64

  2. #2
    c[_]
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    18,728
    why's this news?

    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.

  3. #3
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    wouldn't this fit better in the xtreme benchmark section?
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    62
    The video content itself is not important. It is just a DVD-formatted, progressive MPEG-2 stream running at 23.976 fps with a resolution of 720x480. The important thing is that all those participating in this test use the same clip, the same version of x264, the same version of Avisynth etc. so that the results are comparable.
    thats quite a big nonsense

  5. #5
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Sweden, Örebro
    Posts
    818
    Quote Originally Posted by blaH View Post
    thats quite a big nonsense
    I would have to agree with that. The content of the MPEG-2 is indeed important.

    //Andreas

  6. #6
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    aarhus, denmark...
    Posts
    468
    Quote Originally Posted by STEvil View Post
    why's this news?
    It's the initial release of the benchmark, dated sep. 9th 2007. Qualifies as news to me
    • DFI LANParty LT X38-T2R Rev. AA1
    • Core 2 Duo E8500 @ 4009MHz, 1.31V
    • TRUE @ 2x Scythe S-Flex SFF21F, 5V
    • 4 x 2GB G.Skill Pi PC2-8800
    • MSI R4870X2-T2D2G-OC
    • 3x 74GB Raptor ICH9R Raid0 @ 128KB Stripe Size
    • Plextor PX-716SA/T3KB DVD-RW
    • Auzen X-Fi Prelude @ TI OPA637AU - Thule - Dali/Ultimate Ears - Argento
    • SilverStone OP700
    • CM Stacker 830 Evo
    • Eizo FlexScan HD2441W - Audioquest DV-X
    • WinVista Ultimate 64bit SP1

  7. #7
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    508
    Quote Originally Posted by NH|Delph1 View Post
    I would have to agree with that. The content of the MPEG-2 is indeed important.

    //Andreas

    Why is the content of the MPEG-2 Important?

    Why does it matter if its a 10 second clips of dogs humping? If its the same clips for everybody then its not important what the actual content it.

    If you must know, its just a shot of a swiming pool from a building.
    Asus P5B-D WiFi
    E6300 L626 @ 3.2@ 1.32V
    EVGA 7900GTX
    Big Typhoon Air cooling
    Crucial Ballistix 2x1GB Anniversary
    320GB SeagateSATA
    Enermax 460W PS

  8. #8
    Xtreme News Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
    Posts
    2,065
    Quote Originally Posted by STEvil View Post
    why's this news?
    "There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer

  9. #9
    c[_]
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    18,728
    Looks to me like its a rip-off of this guy's work: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=172

    (results here: http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=122318)


    which sucks, because the other one's a larger download! d'oh.

    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.

  10. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    aarhus, denmark...
    Posts
    468
    Quote Originally Posted by STEvil View Post
    Looks to me like its a rip-off of this guy's work: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=172

    (results here: http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=122318)


    which sucks, because the other one's a larger download! d'oh.
    Okay, I see why you didn't consider this news
    • DFI LANParty LT X38-T2R Rev. AA1
    • Core 2 Duo E8500 @ 4009MHz, 1.31V
    • TRUE @ 2x Scythe S-Flex SFF21F, 5V
    • 4 x 2GB G.Skill Pi PC2-8800
    • MSI R4870X2-T2D2G-OC
    • 3x 74GB Raptor ICH9R Raid0 @ 128KB Stripe Size
    • Plextor PX-716SA/T3KB DVD-RW
    • Auzen X-Fi Prelude @ TI OPA637AU - Thule - Dali/Ultimate Ears - Argento
    • SilverStone OP700
    • CM Stacker 830 Evo
    • Eizo FlexScan HD2441W - Audioquest DV-X
    • WinVista Ultimate 64bit SP1

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •