======================================
E6600 3.24GHz @ 1.35V
D975XBX rev 3.05
Crucial Tracer PC8500 1GB x 4 @ 900MHz 4-4-3-4
evga 7900GT
Dell perc 4e /DC w/ 128MB cache
2 x MAX3073NC Raid 0
2 x 500GB WD
Dell 2407wfp
=======================================
Either it is A1 revision and CPU-Z can't recognize it or it is B1/C1 and same apply!
Pics from VR-Zone are showing Stepping 0, these pics are showing Stepping 1 so definitely both CPUs are different.
I'm afraid guy on Coolalers forum has final B1 rev, but that only time will tell...
RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W
RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU
SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
XBONE paired with 55''Samsung LED 3D TV
The CPUs @ coolaler's forum are not DVT...
They are EVT B0's just like VR-zones...
All the intel fans jumped to early.This Agena processor is clocked at 1.8GHz and is B-0 revision which is an EVT sample for SVID testing only
So,all pre-B2 were buggy.
Here you go:
http://www.vr-zone.com/articles/BA-S...Sept/5196.html
We heard that AMD partners has gotten B1-step Barcelona for compatibility testing with better and newer AGESA code compared to the B0-step Barcelona. There is also B2-step Barcelona which is bug free and then BA-step Barcelona for mass production
AMD is LAUNCHING the K10 on the B1 stepping, per everyone else. Then B2 in Q4. At any rate, it is unlikely that B1 has any huge performance bugs. These results fit precisely with what AMD themselves claimed.... up to 10-15% better IPC than the K8. About in the ballpark of Conroe/Kentsfield per clock. Better on some bandwidth-heavy server stuff & HPC, worse on desktop apps.
Last edited by terrace215; 08-30-2007 at 08:09 AM.
Bookmarks