BioShock Performance Analysis

[Richie P]

Explizit -

Those numbers are quite good, but I recon the combination of XP, faster RAM, the 1GB 2900XT and having it overclocked by nearly 100Mhz will be the reason the numbers look higher. I'd be interested to see a Rivatuner graph of the run

What I will post back when I've tested is comparable numbers with the hotfix installed, and i'll see if overclocking in Vista is working yet.

[Chicco85]

This is my log in fraps on Bioshock Demo:

2007-08-23 10:23:59 - Bioshock
Frames: 1773 - Time: 31867ms - Avg: 55.637 - Min: 33 - Max: 82

2007-08-23 10:25:39 - Bioshock
Frames: 2219 - Time: 32737ms - Avg: 67.782 - Min: 45 - Max: 88

2007-08-23 10:30:40 - Bioshock
Frames: 2677 - Time: 53045ms - Avg: 50.466 - Min: 40 - Max: 75

2007-08-23 10:37:33 - Bioshock
Frames: 5070 - Time: 99546ms - Avg: 50.931 - Min: 30 - Max: 71

2007-08-23 10:45:07 - Bioshock
Frames: 4143 - Time: 73593ms - Avg: 56.296 - Min: 36 - Max: 99

2007-08-23 21:27:31 - Bioshock
Frames: 6278 - Time: 107802ms - Avg: 58.236 - Min: 34 - Max: 91

2007-08-23 21:33:17 - Bioshock
Frames: 7182 - Time: 127105ms - Avg: 56.504 - Min: 38 - Max: 89

Config in signature and Catalyst 7.8 hotfix. Resolution 1680x1050 max detail.

Those runs are in Vista 32 bit in dx10 mode.