Official Desktop Penryn Discussion Thread

[informal]

Zytek_Fan ,never mind Donnie,he does it all the time,nothing new there.Although you made a good proposition about continuing the serious discussion about Penryn,we can't have that since now the main theme is not the Penryn but it sure is Hans,Kyle and others,who no doubt about it, are all amd paid pumpers(sarcasm) and they all work against intel in some grand scheme(sarcasm).
And we have some new MPU design geniuses here(Shintai) who are ready to give some lessons to poor Hans about modern x86 processors.

[mstp2009]

Zytek_Fan ,never mind Donnie,he does it all the time,nothing new there.Although you made a good proposition about continuing the serious discussion about Penryn,we can't have that since now the main theme is not the Penryn but it sure is Hans,Kyle and others,who no doubt about it, are all amd paid pumpers(sarcasm) and they all work against intel in some grand scheme(sarcasm).
And we have some new MPU design geniuses here(Shintai) who are ready to give some lessons to poor Hans about modern x86 processors.

It's ironic how you sit here and ridicule others, but in this and the K10 thread that was closed we never saw you actually make any substantial contribution of intellectual merit.

If it looks like a . . .

[informal]

It's ironic how you sit here and ridicule others, but in this and the K10 thread that was closed we never saw you actually make any substantial contribution of intellectual merit.

If it looks like a . . .

Right...If you think that starting some of the most important news threads about K10 here on XS is no contribution than OK.
We all know how much you contrubuted here

[mstp2009]

Right...If you think that starting some of the most important news threads about K10 here on XS is no contribution than OK.
We all know how much you contrubuted here

Started WHAT threads? At the VERY best you cut and paste stuff (most from the FUD and INQ - LOL).

Your comments might be semi-insightful if they weren't just dripping with anti-intel propaganda. It makes EVERY SINGLE THING YOU SAY just sound like, well . . . A TROLL.

[informal]

As we can all see,you contributed extremely well to this penryn thread.You identified successfully a couple of amd fans(lol) and derailed it well.Now the topic is not penryn any more,what a surprise
Great contribution

[mstp2009]

As we can all see,you contributed extremely well to this penryn thread.You identified successfully a couple of amd fans(lol) and derailed it well.Now the topic is not penryn any more,what a surprise
Great contribution

Still waiting for you to point out your stellar contributions to the forum.

But like a good fanboi, you dodge the subject and point fingers instead of answering questions.

[Movieman]

Puts on Mod hat:
Gentlemen: Please play nice together..Please?
Takes off mod hat:

The only thing I've seen so far that I beleive is what I saw with my own eyes when running Cinebench10.
Penryn shows app 9% improvement over C2D archeticture at the same clocks.
Look in the Cinebench 10 thread and you'll see what I mean.
Now thats not saying that Penryn is a 9% improvement overall, just in that benchmark. It does say that it's a fair assumption at this point that penryn will be better and in the 5-15% range..

Oh,Zytek_Fan, loved that 'Fanboy Cannon" pic!
Cracked me up!

[Donnie27]

Zytek_Fan ,never mind Donnie,he does it all the time,nothing new there.Although you made a good proposition about continuing the serious discussion about Penryn,we can't have that since now the main theme is not the Penryn but it sure is Hans,Kyle and others,who no doubt about it, are all amd paid pumpers(sarcasm) and they all work against intel in some grand scheme(sarcasm).
And we have some new MPU design geniuses here(Shintai) who are ready to give some lessons to poor Hans about modern x86 processors.

Yes, you are so full of it. Nothing's stopping you from your Penryn comments either. Sure, we know it will be something negative. Again, folks in Kyle's own forums disagreed with him big time. Many were banned as well. His comments like;

But, if you look at the amount of difference between the AMD and Intel CPUs, you will see that it isn’t enough to amount to anything. The only game that we saw any real-world difference in was Oblivion, and even that was tiny. A little overclocking would clear that difference up. Overall, the performance difference isn’t enough to amount to any gameplay experience differences in these games.

LOL, a "little overclocking" is all you can get with the AMD processor used for this review. Overclock the very overclockable C2D if you like and then the blowout gets worse. Just like a bunch of misinformed folks here. You can set up Games to bottleneck the Video card and Handicap Penryn the same way. Funny Kyle didn't do this when A64 ruled the roost.

Penryn doesn't hit the market in a Void. If folks cheated for AthlonFX when Conroe clearly kicked the crap out of, if Phenom and Penryn are neck and neck, most folks already know what most Webmasters getting paid more money by AMD will say. NO, not OFF topic and very frickin' relevant.