Page 15 of 25 FirstFirst ... 512131415161718 ... LastLast
Results 351 to 375 of 620

Thread: ASUS 2900XT Benchin begins

  1. #351
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Sweden, Örebro
    Posts
    818
    The tools are not available to the public

    //Andreas

  2. #352
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Posts
    4,594
    Quote Originally Posted by NH|Delph1 View Post
    The tools are not available to the public

    //Andreas
    So AMD have said that no member of public can use thier systems to attain World records? So what value does a record, or attempting to attain one, hold for someone? You are guaranteed not to be able to take the same steps as AMD's agents/reps, so why bother?



    I do not understand such thinking...I got a bunch of nice cards, got a good cpu too, but cannot attain scores like you guys have...


    Nor can anyone else...





  3. #353
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    33
    Quote Originally Posted by cadaveca View Post
    So AMD have said that no member of public can use thier systems to attain World records? So what value does a record, or attempting to attain one, hold for someone? You are guaranteed not to be able to take the same steps as AMD's agents/reps, so why bother?



    I do not understand such thinking...I got a bunch of nice cards, got a good cpu too, but cannot attain scores like you guys have...


    Nor can anyone else...




    There is just a chosen bunch of bencher who is allowed to make a run for the record on the orb
    QX9650orE8500 Cellshock blue 1866mhz 2*1gb zeus 850W Asus 9800GX2 Evga 790i vappochill LS Lianli pc75B

  4. #354
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Linköping, Sweden
    Posts
    388
    Quote Originally Posted by maxxor View Post
    There is just a chosen bunch of bencher who is allowed to make a run for the record on the orb
    In my opinion it is a bit of false marketing. I do belive there are people around the world thinking:

    -If some people can overclock 50%, maybe I can overclock 10%. That will be better than my 8800GTX. I will buy two of thoose.

    (the percents does not matter) Image their suprise when that is not possible... Will the BIOS (or tool) ever be avaliable? The board has been avaliable for quite some time now...

    kinc: looking forward to see your next 06-result!

  5. #355
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Sweden, Örebro
    Posts
    818
    Well, R600 is overclockable without the BIOS updates, but not in CrossFire. The number of people with R600 crossfire is probably rather few. I completely understand though that these people wants to overclock the cards too, but then you should be mad at ATI for making sucky drivers in the first place, not because they've chosen to release BIOSes and flash utilities to a few chosen people. If the BIOSes were left to spread freely chances are that we would have a bunch of people complaining over black screens and cards not working anymore. This is not a good nor permanent solution to CrossFire overclocking, this is a highly temporary solution. Wait for real CrossFire overclocking instead.

    //Andreas

  6. #356
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Linköping, Sweden
    Posts
    388
    Do not missunderstand me, I am not angry at the ones who has the BIOS. I just think it is strange of ATI/AMD to do like this. Maybe they have big problem, I do not know the reason...

    And as you said, there are not that many people with two of theese. Thoose who has knows how to handle it I guess so the number of RMA should not be that many that are related to OC in CF.

    And this 'highly temporary solution' has existed for about two month now i think. I know some people bought two of theese cards in the beginning of june (because of great published results) and still not have any chance to OC in CF. I do understand if they are pissed.

    /blossa - keeping his 8800GTX

  7. #357
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Conroe, Texas
    Posts
    3,010
    What Pcie Frequency is the best for this card? Anyone know?


  8. #358
    Xtreme 3D Team Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    small town in Indiana
    Posts
    2,285
    Quote Originally Posted by road-runner View Post
    What Pcie Frequency is the best for this card? Anyone know?
    higher the better. i believe 169 has been done already.
    QX 9650 5ghz with 1.55v 4.8ghz with 1.5v 24/7 in a VAPOLI V-2000B+ Single stage phase cooling.
    DFI LP LT X-38 T2R
    2X HD4850's water cooled , volt modded
    Thermaltake 1KW Psu
    4x Seagate 250GB in RAID 0
    8GB crucial ballistix ram

  9. #359
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,984
    Quote Originally Posted by road-runner View Post
    What Pcie Frequency is the best for this card? Anyone know?
    I guess it depends on your clocks, with high clocks it could definitely need the extra PCI-E bandwidth. I can run up to 150 mhz PCI-E (yup.. 50 mhz PCI; soundcard, raid, all kept working, tested it for a day straight, lol) but I didn't really notice a different versus 120 mhz PCI-E. I was running 850/1070 stock cooler/volts. But honestly i didn't really test it thoroughly enough. I think with higher clocks it will matter more..

    Ryzen 9 3900X w/ NH-U14s on MSI X570 Unify
    32 GB Patriot Viper Steel 3733 CL14 (1.51v)
    RX 5700 XT w/ 2x 120mm fan mod (2 GHz)
    Tons of NVMe & SATA SSDs
    LG 27GL850 + Asus MG279Q
    Meshify C white

  10. #360
    Admin
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    5,225
    Quote Originally Posted by blossa View Post
    Do not missunderstand me, I am not angry at the ones who has the BIOS. I just think it is strange of ATI/AMD to do like this. Maybe they have big problem, I do not know the reason...

    And as you said, there are not that many people with two of theese. Thoose who has knows how to handle it I guess so the number of RMA should not be that many that are related to OC in CF.

    And this 'highly temporary solution' has existed for about two month now i think. I know some people bought two of theese cards in the beginning of june (because of great published results) and still not have any chance to OC in CF. I do understand if they are pissed.

    /blossa - keeping his 8800GTX
    I agree...I'm not pleased in the slightest about this either. If you wanna hate on me though go for it.

  11. #361
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,184
    New P5W64 board. No new good QX (RIP) so im running 05 for now. Actually none of the L713 QX6850 are stable above 4900MHz on neither blitz or P5W64

    X6800 L617
    Corsair 6400C3
    ASUS P5W64
    ASUS 2900XT CF 1080/999MHz

    Last edited by Kinc; 08-04-2007 at 07:07 PM.

  12. #362
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    526
    Quote Originally Posted by biohead View Post
    I guess it depends on your clocks, with high clocks it could definitely need the extra PCI-E bandwidth. I can run up to 150 mhz PCI-E (yup.. 50 mhz PCI; soundcard, raid, all kept working, tested it for a day straight, lol) but I didn't really notice a different versus 120 mhz PCI-E. I was running 850/1070 stock cooler/volts. But honestly i didn't really test it thoroughly enough. I think with higher clocks it will matter more..
    The 2900XT have been designed first for PCI ex 2.0, the card is aim for 175mhz compability.
    Now.. it depend of the motherboard you are using. some are really fine for increase the PCI express frequencies ( the P5W64 for example, like it have more resources in W and Amper dedicated to the PCi express slots.. like there's 4x slots on it.. ) so you can up the frequencies with no worry.. On some board.. it seems it can be more a problem, with variation prob.

    And off course you are right: the extra bandwith is not a garantee, folowing the OC of the system, and the core /memory clocks

  13. #363
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    526
    Quote Originally Posted by Kinc View Post
    New P5W64 board. No new good QX (RIP) so im running 05 for now. Actually none of the L713 QX6850 are stable above 4900MHz on neither blitz or P5W64

    X6800 L617
    Corsair 6400C3
    ASUS P5W64
    ASUS 2900XT CF 1080/999MHz


    Nice Kinc... 35K will be soon history... Congrats.!!

    By cursiosity: i have see you have use 6400C3 D9GKX Corsair.. what was the speed and timings you have use?
    Last edited by Lane-k; 08-04-2007 at 11:21 PM.

  14. #364
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Linköping, Sweden
    Posts
    388
    Quote Originally Posted by Kinc View Post
    New P5W64 board. No new good QX (RIP) so im running 05 for now. Actually none of the L713 QX6850 are stable above 4900MHz on neither blitz or P5W64

    X6800 L617
    Corsair 6400C3
    ASUS P5W64
    ASUS 2900XT CF 1080/999MHz
    Nice result! Keep going for 35k. But I guess you already knew that.

    To bad about the quads. I guess that it confirms that on air the QX6850 outperforms the QX6700, but when it comes to real cold it is not that much difference. Maybe I thought that there would be more QX6850 @5GHz than there has been QX6700, now I am not that sure anymore.

    Gautam: Thanks for the offer! If I get mad about something sometime and do not have anyone to be angy with, I might pick you.

  15. #365
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Sweden, Örebro
    Posts
    818
    Quote Originally Posted by blossa View Post
    Do not missunderstand me, I am not angry at the ones who has the BIOS. I just think it is strange of ATI/AMD to do like this. Maybe they have big problem, I do not know the reason...
    I would certainly agree to that.

    //Andreas

  16. #366
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    706
    Quote Originally Posted by NH|Delph1 View Post
    Well, R600 is overclockable without the BIOS updates, but not in CrossFire. The number of people with R600 crossfire is probably rather few. I completely understand though that these people wants to overclock the cards too, but then you should be mad at ATI for making sucky drivers in the first place, not because they've chosen to release BIOSes and flash utilities to a few chosen people. If the BIOSes were left to spread freely chances are that we would have a bunch of people complaining over black screens and cards not working anymore. This is not a good nor permanent solution to CrossFire overclocking, this is a highly temporary solution. Wait for real CrossFire overclocking instead.

    //Andreas
    Quote Originally Posted by blossa
    Do not missunderstand me, I am not angry at the ones who has the BIOS. I just think it is strange of ATI/AMD to do like this. Maybe they have big problem, I do not know the reason...

    And as you said, there are not that many people with two of theese. Thoose who has knows how to handle it I guess so the number of RMA should not be that many that are related to OC in CF.

    And this 'highly temporary solution' has existed for about two month now i think. I know some people bought two of theese cards in the beginning of june (because of great published results) and still not have any chance to OC in CF. I do understand if they are pissed.

    /blossa - keeping his 8800GTX
    i also have crossfire and i agree with both the points above currently the hd2900 is the only dual card setup which can't be overclocked by the end user which seems a shame i bought the crossfire for its overclocking potential and i have fitted waterblocks and everything and its sat there at stock clocks
    Last edited by GLENBOY; 08-05-2007 at 06:09 AM.

  17. #367
    Admin
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    5,225
    Quote Originally Posted by Kinc View Post
    New P5W64 board. No new good QX (RIP) so im running 05 for now. Actually none of the L713 QX6850 are stable above 4900MHz on neither blitz or P5W64

    X6800 L617
    Corsair 6400C3
    ASUS P5W64
    ASUS 2900XT CF 1080/999MHz
    Oooh! My life just got 10x harder. Not that I'd have expected any less.

    Awesome awesome score!

  18. #368
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,184
    Quote Originally Posted by Gautam View Post
    Oooh! My life just got 10x harder. Not that I'd have expected any less.

    Awesome awesome score!
    Thank you man

    Any kentsfield yet for 3dmark 06?

  19. #369
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,184
    Quote Originally Posted by Lane-k View Post
    Nice Kinc... 35K will be soon history... Congrats.!!

    By cursiosity: i have see you have use 6400C3 D9GKX Corsair.. what was the speed and timings you have use?
    Im running 1:1 3-3-3-5. I forgot to set the subtimings for the last run wich made me lose about 0.6 fps in gt1 and 0.2 in gt2.

  20. #370
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    671
    I see both you Marcus and Gautam has been busy, great scores! Seems like I need to pull off a session aswell I think I found a really nice X6800 at last, though I'd need some GPU-pots, which are on the run atm.
    Last edited by elmor; 08-05-2007 at 01:25 PM.
    2008 - AOCC WW #2 | MOA EU #8 | GOOC WW #1
    2009 - GOOC WW #3 | MOA EU #3 | MOA WW #1 | GB TweaKing #6 | ASUS ROG OCS #2
    2010 - MOA EU #1 | GOOC EU #13 | MOA WW #1
    2011 - MOA EU #4 | MOA WW #?

  21. #371
    Admin
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    5,225
    Quote Originally Posted by Kinc View Post
    Thank you man

    Any kentsfield yet for 3dmark 06?
    Heh, thanks for reminding me.

    Quote Originally Posted by elmor View Post
    I see both you Marcus and Gautam has been busy, great scores! Seems like I need to pull off a session aswell I think I found a really nice X6800 at last, though I'd need some GPU-pots, which are on the run atm.
    You and me both. I was wondering how long you were just going to sit and watch. The first thing in your sig is scaring me. :O

  22. #372
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,707
    Some pics from Assembly demo and LAN party which was held this weekend in Helsinki, Finland:









    More: http://plaza.fi/muropaketti/artikkel...ly-summer-2007
    Favourite game: 3DMark
    Work: Muropaketti.com - Finnish hardware site
    Views and opinions about IT industry: Twitter: sampsa_kurri

  23. #373
    Admin
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    5,225
    Marcus is looking very distinguished sportin' that extra facial hair.

    How come I don't see you?

  24. #374
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,184
    Quote Originally Posted by elmor View Post
    I see both you Marcus and Gautam has been busy, great scores! Seems like I need to pull off a session aswell I think I found a really nice X6800 at last, though I'd need some GPU-pots, which are on the run atm.
    Good to hear about the X6800! Lets hope it is a 5.4GHz chip. I had to run almost 2.1V this time to be able to run 5.35.

    I just got the rev4s from Jason. I'll have your rev2s send over with some extra goods right away Thanks for lending em they have served me good

  25. #375
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Jonesboro, AR
    Posts
    750
    That's really unfortunate....I wasn't aware that you couldn't flash the BIOS of our cards for OCing in Crossfire.
    Those are some great OCs you guys are getting on them! I was really impressed at how well this card responded to OCing.
    Q6600 G0 @ 3.8 (475x8) 1.496V || ASUS Maximus Formula X38 || 4x2GB Geil Evo One DDR2-950 5-5-5-15 ||
    Sapphire 4870X2 857/1000 || XSPC Delrin full coverage block || MCP655 || D-Tek Fuzion Nozzled ||
    Black Ice 480GTX 8 120mm Yate Loon push/pull || Silverstone DA850 PSU 70A +12V || Auzentech Prelude ||
    Vantage P15071 in Vista x64

Page 15 of 25 FirstFirst ... 512131415161718 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •