Cpu-z 1.40.8

[hecktic]

I just updated. It should work now.

negative

downloaded it again and tried it and getting same wrong VID as before.

[cpuz]

negative

downloaded it again and tried it and getting same wrong VID as before.

I spoke too fast.
This should work this time.
http://www.cpuid.com/beta/cpuz.zip

[biohead]

I spoke too fast.
This should work this time.
http://www.cpuid.com/beta/cpuz.zip

YGPM, the vcore is fixed though, thanks.

[Cracker]

I spoke too fast.
This should work this time.
http://www.cpuid.com/beta/cpuz.zip

Good work! Core voltage is now properly displayed with this latest version. (for the E6400 anyway)

[Nedjo]

I spoke too fast.
This should work this time.
http://www.cpuid.com/beta/cpuz.zip

One question.

since yesterday I'm on Vista x64 (with these prices of memory I want full usable 4GB working), and I was wondering would it be possible to compile CPU-Z for native 64bit??

There's CrystalCPUID (http://dl.crystaldew.info/download/C...PUID413x64.zip) but I much, much more prefer your awesome utill!

BR

Nedjo

[hecktic]

I spoke too fast.
This should work this time.
http://www.cpuid.com/beta/cpuz.zip

I think its fixed... but its not the same voltage though...

cpuz1.40.5 gives me 1.248 for VID

and the one I just downloaded gives me an exact 1.25 for VID

which one is accurate?

[cpuz]

I think its fixed... but its not the same voltage though...

cpuz1.40.5 gives me 1.248 for VID

and the one I just downloaded gives me an exact 1.25 for VID

which one is accurate?

Does it displays "Core VID" or "Core Voltage" ?

[ziddey]

I think its fixed... but its not the same voltage though...

cpuz1.40.5 gives me 1.248 for VID

and the one I just downloaded gives me an exact 1.25 for VID

which one is accurate?

It sounds like that's the actual voltage? If you had a 1.35v vid and exceeded the upper 1.4's, you'd be seeing 1.238v static in older cpuz. so 1.248 is something else

[hecktic]

Does it displays "Core VID" or "Core Voltage" ?

err sorry it just says Voltage 1.248 v under cpz 1.40.5

1.40.8 says Core Voltage and it shows up as 1.25 V

I just noticed it uses a capital V and not lower case v like 1.40.5

So what is accurate here?

It sounds like that's the actual voltage? If you had a 1.35v vid and exceeded the upper 1.4's, you'd be seeing 1.238v static in older cpuz. so 1.248 is something else

According to core temp my VID is 1.3250