Results 1 to 25 of 416

Thread: Xtreme Low Q6600 G0 Temp on Air !!! (Lots of Pics)

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Va.
    Posts
    161
    Quote Originally Posted by atlr View Post
    Cool. Nice observations.

    I think you can see this progression of lower temperatures needed for stable higher frequency operation in Intel's specs. The Thermal Specification for the highest frequency processor is lower than that of lower frequency CPUs.

    A Q6600 G-0 has
    Thermal Design Power: 95W
    Thermal Specification: 71C

    A QX6850 G-0 has
    Thermal Design Power: 130W
    Thermal Specification: 64.5C

    I think a correct re-wording of these specs for a Q6600 G-0 is that a CPU cooler must dissipate thermal energy at a rate of 95W to keep Tcase temperatures under 71C to prevent throttling at 2.4GHz.

    Likewise, the QX6850 G-0 needs a cooler to dissipate 130W to keep Tcase below 64.5C for 3GHz operation.

    Just to add to your info above, they've changed the Xeon parts to some new specs recently...

    A X3220 G-0 has (equiv to Q6600)
    Thermal Design Power: 100W
    Thermal Specification: 85C

    A X3210 G-0 has (equiv to non-existent Q6400 @2.13GHz, 8x multiplier)
    Thermal Design Power: 100W
    Thermal Specification: 85C

    ...so it looks like the server parts have more headroom.
    Rig under construction:

    Core 2 Quad Q6600 G0 - L733B470 1.25 VID
    DFI LanParty LT P35-T2R
    Thermalright Ultima 90 w/Zalman ZM-F3 1800rpm
    G.SKILL 4GB(2 x 2GB) DDR2 1000 (PC2 8000)
    XFX GeForce 7900GS 256MB (will upgd in Q2)
    Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 250GB
    Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB
    LG Electronics 18X SATA DVD
    XCLIO GREATPOWER 550W
    Antec P182B case

  2. #2
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Richmond (GVA), BC, Canada
    Posts
    541
    Quote Originally Posted by Spanki View Post
    Just to add to your info above, they've changed the Xeon parts to some new specs recently...

    A X3220 G-0 has (equiv to Q6600)
    Thermal Design Power: 100W
    Thermal Specification: 85C

    A X3210 G-0 has (equiv to non-existent Q6400 @2.13GHz, 8x multiplier)
    Thermal Design Power: 100W
    Thermal Specification: 85C

    ...so it looks like the server parts have more headroom.
    Nice info.
    But even with greater delta for more headroom doesn't necessary means decent overclock-ability. In the end, it may ended up with a similar OC but at a higher temp and still within the thermal spec. The additional +5W consumption does makes sense to also increase the thermal spec up to 85C.
    It's still a gamble and luck of draw but I'd personally go with a lower TDP and relatively lower thermal spec CPU to OC than higher TDP + higher Thermal Spec CPU. This is how my logic and experience has given me.

    The only way to really draw some clear statements is by accumulating enough OC database for the new X3220/3210 and compare them to the G0 Q6600
    Xtreme Air-Cooled OC System:
    Mobo: Asus Rampage Formula (X38 Edition) Rev 1.03G (BIOS: 0803)
    CPU: C2Q Q6600 "G0" L723A765, VID 1.2625, 3720mhz, FSB 465*8, Vcore: 1.464, Idle/load temp: 31c/64c
    CPU Heatsink: Thermalright Ultra120 Xtreme lapped (2* Scythe S-Flex SFF21F S-FDB 120mm Push-Pull configuration)
    RAM: Kingston HyperX T1 2x2GB PC2-8500 (DDR2-1116)(5-5-5-15-3-52-6-3-8-3-5-4-6-4-6-14-5-1-5-5)(2.264 Vdimm)(Rated @ 2.3v default clock)
    HDD: Western Digital Caviar Black 640GB WD6401AALS-00L3B (AHCI)
    Video Card: XFX 8800GTS 320mb Xtreme, Core 612 Shader 1420 Mem 900 (Stock cooling)
    Sound Card: Auzentech Meridian 7.1 (8788 chipset)
    DVD: Pioneer 212D SATA DVD-RW
    PSU: Corsair HX620W Modular
    Xtreme Air Cooled Case: Antec 900 case | 3*120mm intake | 1*120mm & 1*200mm exhuast
    OS: Vista Ultimate x64 SP1 Build 6001

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •