Core i7 920 D0 B-batch (4.1) (Kinda Stable?) | DFI X58 T3eH8 (Fed up with its' issues, may get a new board soon) | Patriot 1600 (9-9-9-24) (for now) | XFX HD 4890 (971/1065) (for now) |
80GB X25-m G2 | WD 640GB | PCP&C 750 | Dell 2408 LCD | NEC 1970GX LCD | Win7 Pro | CoolerMaster ATCS 840 {Modded to reverse-ATX, WC'ing internal}
CPU Loop: MCP655 > HK 3.0 LT > ST 320 (3x Scythe G's) > ST Res >Pump
GPU Loop: MCP655 > MCW-60 > PA160 (1x YL D12SH) > ST Res > BIP 220 (2x YL D12SH) >Pump
Usual suspects: i5-750 & H212+ | Biostar T5XE CFX-SLI | 4GB RAndoM | 4850 + AC S1 + 120@5V + modded stock for VRAM/VRM | Seasonic S12-600 | 7200.12 | P180 | U2311H & S2253BW | MX518
mITX media & to-be-server machine: A330ION | Seasonic SFX | WD600BEVS boot & WD15EARS data
Laptops: Lifebook T4215 tablet, Vaio TX3XP
Bike: ZX6R
here is the thing about heat pipes.
Yes, they MOVE heat more effeciently than plain old copper, but the problem is that you have to get the heat INTO the heatpipe. whever there is a heatpipe to copper/aluminum joint, a significant thermal resistance is introduced.
Secondly, to remove the heat from the heat pipe. again with the joint thermal resistance issue. On top of that, when you put a heatsink into a water chamber like thermaltake did you are wasting alot of thermal effeciency because the water will remove all of the heat from the fins (attached to the heatpipe) very quickly. Because of this you want more heatpipes with ALOT of short fins, not a few longer fins like you have in the more common air based heatsinks like the scythe ninja and thermalright HR series.
Lastly, the way that thermaltake has the fins and water inlet/outlet arranged is absolutely retarded. For maximum thermal effeciency you need to have the water moving at a decent pace with no dead spots (stagnant water). This design will create alot of hot spots where the water will stand still.
I'm worried about that as well, but it's not really clear. It seems some fins are shorter than others and water would flow in a channel-like path. If that's the case it may be very restrictive but I dont think there'll be stagnant water.
Hey this block may not be perfect, but it's the first of its kind. I think there is a lot of potential for this concept.
There are a couple of great ideas so far, I think your suggestion for shorter fins and more pipes is a good idea.
I'll add that it'd be interesting to see a block with pipes covering a larger area at the base, and a hybrid design: pin matrix at the middle and pipes around.
hehehe.. hope to see some results..![]()
Asus P5W64 WS Professional , DFI Infinity 965P-S (testing)
X6800, E6750 es
![]()
Micron Fatbodies , Micron D9gkx oem, Crucial 8000, Crucial Tracer 8500 (incomming)![]()
Ati FireGL V5100, Elsa FireGL V3100![]()
water cooling setup (EK 775 cpu block, swiftech NB Block, Swiftech pump, BI dual pass dual 120mm)![]()
Silverstone OP650![]()
raptors, baracuda![]()
so negative guys
let them experiment
who knows maybe they'll stumble into something good![]()
At least it shows somebody is still thinking; even if it probably won't help much, and it's going to be absurdly restrictive. Maybe if they removed the heatpipes, and turned the fins so that they're more vertical to fit with the water flow, it'd be worth something.
That design makes zero sense period . It pretty and all but performance wise it will be 7c higher temps than the most efficient designs out today. looks very restrictive also .
Well if you look at the base its very thick so the water won't help much as far as kooling the base. 2 heat pipes isn't efficient at all compared to water combining them and not using the water to help cool the base is just stupid.
Lets wait for some results befor we debate this much . ITS real pretty tho.
Yes, but there's a reason the pins are not 2 inches long or 6 inches long in a GTX/Fuzion... it would add little benefit. Water is much more efficient than air so using a design that works with air for a water cooling block is rediculous and ignores why water is good in the first place.
Bookmarks