Page 26 of 41 FirstFirst ... 162324252627282936 ... LastLast
Results 626 to 650 of 1008

Thread: Official AMD Barcelona Thread

  1. #626
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Thessaloniki, Greece
    Posts
    1,307
    I wouldnt expect the desktop parts before November at the earliest. Quantities will probably be coming sometime in December.
    Seems we made our greatest error when we named it at the start
    for though we called it "Human Nature" - it was cancer of the heart
    CPU: AMD X3 720BE@ 3,4Ghz
    Cooler: Xigmatek S1283(Terrible mounting system for AM2/3)
    Motherboard: Gigabyte 790FXT-UD5P(F4) RAM: 2x 2GB OCZ DDR3 1600Mhz Gold 8-8-8-24
    GPU:HD5850 1GB
    PSU: Seasonic M12D 750W Case: Coolermaster HAF932(aka Dusty )

  2. #627
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Thessaloniki, Greece
    Posts
    1,307
    Quote Originally Posted by terrace215 View Post
    A K10 benchmark? It's the SPEC 2006 CPU integer throughput benchmark! Your last sentence is nonsense. SPEC is designed to compare the performance of different CPUs, not all of them even x86. Of course submissions use different compilers! Sheesh.
    What im saying is that when you are benchmarking for raw CPU performance you have to use the same compiler, otherwise the compiler comes into play as well. That is ok when you benchmark to see how YOUR code will run but you cant directly compare CPUs like that.
    Seems we made our greatest error when we named it at the start
    for though we called it "Human Nature" - it was cancer of the heart
    CPU: AMD X3 720BE@ 3,4Ghz
    Cooler: Xigmatek S1283(Terrible mounting system for AM2/3)
    Motherboard: Gigabyte 790FXT-UD5P(F4) RAM: 2x 2GB OCZ DDR3 1600Mhz Gold 8-8-8-24
    GPU:HD5850 1GB
    PSU: Seasonic M12D 750W Case: Coolermaster HAF932(aka Dusty )

  3. #628
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by BrowncoatGR View Post
    What im saying is that when you are benchmarking for raw CPU performance you have to use the same compiler, otherwise the compiler comes into play as well. That is ok when you benchmark to see how YOUR code will run but you cant directly compare CPUs like that.
    Yep,this is correct.

  4. #629
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,978
    Quote Originally Posted by quake6 View Post
    When it will be for desktop?
    The first desktop SKUs are rumored to be November maybe December. About 6-8 weeks after the server variety come out.

    The leaked roadmap (take with some grains of salt) is here:
    http://www.digitimes.com/mobos/a20070622PD217.html

  5. #630
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,125
    Quote Originally Posted by BrowncoatGR View Post
    What im saying is that when you are benchmarking for raw CPU performance you have to use the same compiler, otherwise the compiler comes into play as well. That is ok when you benchmark to see how YOUR code will run but you cant directly compare CPUs like that.
    Sure you can. Since a single compiler can already output different code for different parts (K10 vs. C2D, say), you are not comparing the identical code across processors.

    So, you're looking to see which processor can "get the job done", i.e. PERFORM, best. So you might as well compare the performance of the best code you can get for each part, and that may mean using different compilers for your source code (i.e. the job).
    Last edited by terrace215; 07-01-2007 at 09:57 AM.

  6. #631
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Thessaloniki, Greece
    Posts
    1,307
    Quote Originally Posted by terrace215 View Post
    Sure you can. Since a single compiler can already output different code for different parts (K10 vs. C2D, say), you are not comparing the identical code across processors.

    So, you're looking to see which processor can "get the job done", i.e. PERFORM, best. So you might as well compare the performance of the best code you can get for each part, and that may mean using different compilers for your source code (i.e. the job).
    :O you are right. I still think your calculations are off though
    Seems we made our greatest error when we named it at the start
    for though we called it "Human Nature" - it was cancer of the heart
    CPU: AMD X3 720BE@ 3,4Ghz
    Cooler: Xigmatek S1283(Terrible mounting system for AM2/3)
    Motherboard: Gigabyte 790FXT-UD5P(F4) RAM: 2x 2GB OCZ DDR3 1600Mhz Gold 8-8-8-24
    GPU:HD5850 1GB
    PSU: Seasonic M12D 750W Case: Coolermaster HAF932(aka Dusty )

  7. #632
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    103
    yeah, guys whens the desktop version going to come out??

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Phenom

    Phenom

    also is Barcelona compatible with Socket 1207FX??

    will these mobo work with Barcelona??
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...(Socket+1207FX)

  8. #633
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    The wiki is very wrong. They expect 2.8Ghz Quads in Q3. But AMD will only release 2Ghz.

    The wattage is also wrong ofcourse.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  9. #634
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    The wiki is very wrong. They expect 2.8Ghz Quads in Q3. But AMD will only release 2Ghz.

    The wattage is also wrong ofcourse.
    Since you obviously know everything about what AMD is doing, why don't you write a book and sell it to Intel for a Billion dollars
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  10. #635
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Thessaloniki, Greece
    Posts
    1,307
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    The wiki is very wrong. They expect 2.8Ghz Quads in Q3. But AMD will only release 2Ghz.

    The wattage is also wrong ofcourse.
    Afaik not much has changed (yet?) for desktop processors. The most up to date info was 2.6ghz in Q4 and 2.8 in Q1 08. Quad FX processors for socket L1 could launch in late Q3 though as they are low volume parts anyway. Still i expect the worst case scenario for Phenom for it to top out at 2.4 ghz, although i think that's unlikely. s for the wattage you are wrong. Opterons are always ratted higher than desktop processors
    Seems we made our greatest error when we named it at the start
    for though we called it "Human Nature" - it was cancer of the heart
    CPU: AMD X3 720BE@ 3,4Ghz
    Cooler: Xigmatek S1283(Terrible mounting system for AM2/3)
    Motherboard: Gigabyte 790FXT-UD5P(F4) RAM: 2x 2GB OCZ DDR3 1600Mhz Gold 8-8-8-24
    GPU:HD5850 1GB
    PSU: Seasonic M12D 750W Case: Coolermaster HAF932(aka Dusty )

  11. #636
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    3,200
    Quote Originally Posted by nn_step View Post
    Since you obviously know everything about what AMD is doing, why don't you write a book and sell it to Intel for a Billion dollars
    Agreed. I tire of hearing his bull
    "To exist in this vast universe for a speck of time is the great gift of life. Our tiny sliver of time is our gift of life. It is our only life. The universe will go on, indifferent to our brief existence, but while we are here we touch not just part of that vastness, but also the lives around us. Life is the gift each of us has been given. Each life is our own and no one else's. It is precious beyond all counting. It is the greatest value we have. Cherish it for what it truly is."

  12. #637
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Perhaps Zytek_Fan and nn_step should try and read the AMD press release and compare it to the Wiki!

    Now tell me who is wrong, the Wiki or the AMD press release.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  13. #638
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by BrowncoatGR View Post
    Afaik not much has changed (yet?) for desktop processors. The most up to date info was 2.6ghz in Q4 and 2.8 in Q1 08. Quad FX processors for socket L1 could launch in late Q3 though as they are low volume parts anyway. Still i expect the worst case scenario for Phenom for it to top out at 2.4 ghz, although i think that's unlikely. s for the wattage you are wrong. Opterons are always ratted higher than desktop processors
    Actually desktops are higher than servers. The servers gets the premium chips.

    2.8Ghz in Q1, where? Also the wiki dont even use the numbers they refer to.

    http://www.dailytech.com/Final+AMD+S...rticle7157.htm

    Currently the most up to date info is 2.3Ghz in Q4. And 2.3Ghz+ in Q1.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  14. #639
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Belgium, Dendermonde
    Posts
    1,292
    Quote Originally Posted by Zytek_Fan View Post
    Agreed. I tire of hearing his bull
    QFT

  15. #640
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,125
    Quote Originally Posted by BrowncoatGR View Post
    Afaik not much has changed (yet?) for desktop processors. The most up to date info was 2.6ghz in Q4 and 2.8 in Q1 08.
    No, that's not correct.

    It's "2.2-2.4" in late Q4 for the best Phenom Quadcore (so midpoint is 2.3)
    In Q1, that becomes "2.4-2.6" for Phenom Quadcore (midpoint 2.5)

    The only "2.8" is the upper end of the "2.4-2.8" Phenom DUAL core range for Q1 08. (The 6xxx series)

    http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=40348
    http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=40347

  16. #641
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    215

    2.0?!?!

    AMD to Launch "Barcelona" Slow this August
    http://www.dailytech.com/Article.aspx?newsid=7890

    AMD announced today what analysts have been dreading for months: the company will launch its next-generation architecture this August, at top-out frequencies of 2.0 GHz. This next-generation CPU will become the successor of the existing K8 AMD Opteron lineup.
    Last edited by lapdog; 07-01-2007 at 06:51 PM.

  17. #642
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by lapdog View Post
    AMD to Launch "Barcelona" Slow this August
    http://www.dailytech.com/Article.aspx?newsid=7890
    Welcome to page 25

  18. #643
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    northern ireland
    Posts
    1,008

  19. #644
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Devon
    Posts
    3,437
    Quote Originally Posted by gallag View Post
    This is in line with Charlie assumption (link) that AMD might went straight from B1 rev. to Cx rev. to sort out all clocking problems at once.

    So this is good news in bad news... I would prefer 2.5GHz+ Phenom in Q108 than few 2.3GHz- Phenoms in December 07.
    RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W

    RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU

    SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
    XBONE paired with 55'' Samsung LED 3D TV

  20. #645
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    585
    well as long as Barcelona is on route i dont care for Phenom(Idiotic name:/)

    Im just waiting for my chance to go 2P quad for a Total of Octa Cores
    Now that Platform will rock

  21. #646
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    585
    Quote Originally Posted by californian7856 View Post

    also is Barcelona compatible with Socket 1207FX??

    will these mobo work with Barcelona??
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...(Socket+1207FX)
    well if Asus update the Bios it should work, But why would you want that Powerhog of an motherboard??
    Why not go for a real server board instead,with way lower power cunsumption

  22. #647
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    381
    Quote Originally Posted by gallag View Post
    Mobo makers say AMD Phenom delayed until 1Q08, but AMD says launch remains set for 2H07 (update)

    AMD has responded to this report by stating that the company's official launch schedule for Phenom remains the second half of 2007 and this schedule has not changed. The company added that it has not contacted motherboard makers concerning a delay to the schedule.

  23. #648
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by PetNorth View Post
    Mobo makers say AMD Phenom delayed until 1Q08, but AMD says launch remains set for 2H07 (update)

    AMD has responded to this report by stating that the company's official launch schedule for Phenom remains the second half of 2007 and this schedule has not changed. The company added that it has not contacted motherboard makers concerning a delay to the schedule.
    Lets not hope its another "65nm in December" type of launch.

    But currently I haven´t seen a reason on why it cant be 2007 yet.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  24. #649
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] Teroedni View Post
    well if Asus update the Bios it should work, But why would you want that Powerhog of an motherboard??
    Why not go for a real server board instead,with way lower power cunsumption
    Wouldn´t there be an issue with ECC vs non ECC memory. And maybe registered.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  25. #650
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    Wouldn´t there be an issue with ECC vs non ECC memory. And maybe registered.
    No,like shown before here on the forum,Opterons work without issues on Asus Quad FX mobo.

Page 26 of 41 FirstFirst ... 162324252627282936 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •