amazing...
amazing...
Stacker830 Watercooled
windows7 ultimate 64 bit!!!
heatkiller(rev3) on 2500k@ 4.5ghz 1.35v,8 gigs 2133 ripjaws 1.5v
Swiftech Mcp-655,1/2in tygon,13x120 sunnons on junk ps,
(2)triple 120mm rads,Biostar TP67XE(rev 5.2)
150 gig velicraptor (stable drive) ssds r still buggy!!
xfi-xtrememusic,klipsch ultras, sen hd-595s
Evga Hydro gtX 590,co0lermaster-1250 watt,
24" Sony fw-900 black ops at @ 2304x1440 85hz/85fps SOLID
G@m3r 4 L1Fe!!
http://s76.photobucket.com/albums/j1...0VIEW%20ALL--/
3dmark 11 http://3dmark.com/3dm11/1102387
are the corsair DDR3 8500s all micron
Last edited by billdavis; 06-26-2007 at 03:52 PM.
1
Great bandwith BA
You make my old Corsairs 6400C3 feelind a litle depressed
Can only obtain 12.524 MB/s at DDR900 3-3-3-3 1T
Last edited by Pedro Rocha; 06-26-2007 at 03:37 PM.
Great job BA!
Quite impressed with DDR3 at this early in the game.
Since I was in AMD world when DDR2 came out, was early DDR2 this good as well? I know that the fatbodies were released relatively early.
I wonder if it's the same with DDR3. Ah, too much speculating for now I guess.
Anyway, thanks for showing us the potential of DDR3.
Now only if DDR3 would come down in price...
Why do most overclockers want to go back to the old DDR1 like stock voltage
Nice Results
To be a professional noob/idiot
* Default factory speed is for noobs.
* Everything must go above the speed that the factory consider safe.
* Everything for more performance
* Everything fits, and everything can be broken.
* Most problems can be fixed by adding a volt or two.
* Post things in your signature that makes no sense at all.
Awesome results...
I wish I had some DDR3 to play with (too bad is soo expensive )
Asus P5W64 WS Professional , DFI Infinity 965P-S (testing)
X6800 , E6750 es
Micron Fatbodies , Micron D9gkx oem, Crucial 8000, Crucial Tracer 8500 (incomming)
Ati FireGL V5100, Elsa FireGL V3100
water cooling setup (EK 775 cpu block, swiftech NB Block, Swiftech pump, BI dual pass dual 120mm)
Silverstone OP650
raptors, baracuda
no 3d benches?
There's some nice DDR3 results Why would you think 13k read bandwidth is out of reach? I have some DDR2 with read bandwidth over 14000 MB/s.
Last edited by Timbosan; 07-23-2007 at 06:16 PM.
Must be a bugged run.. try Everest Ultimate 4.0.1033 beta version instead
---
I have the full version, why would it be bugged, and why would the beta be better? (I would have thought full version would be better than the beta)
Anyway got a link to it i cant find it? Im more than happy to install & bench again. Alternatively send it to
timbosan@gmail.com
thanks
you should always compare with same software if you can particularly with synthetic benchmarks like this
EVEREST Ultimate Edition Beta Build 1076 seems to be the latest one
Lavalys Discussion Forum > Lavalys EVEREST > Beta versions
i950 (3035B684)
Gigabyte EX58A-UD3R
3x4GB G.Skill PC3-12800 7-8-7-24
HIS Radeon HD 6970 2GB & Dell 3007WFP-HC
Asus Xonar DX
128GB C300, Velociraptor & Sammy F3's
Corsair AX850W
Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1
try these 2 http://www.softpedia.com/get/System/...-Edition.shtml
edit thanks Pyr0 for the link
---
im at work so i cant check right now, but im using one of those latest versions, as it correctly detects my P965 chipset etc. its not a beta version though. its been consistent though, before i got my new ram i was still pulling over 12k read bandwidth.
Here's is my write, copy & latency Everest benches at same settings as the above read bench. Compared to others i have seen they look fine, if not low. I have seen other DDR2 pulling 14K+ read BW too.
EDIT: i removed pics didnt wanna hijack the thread.
Last edited by Timbosan; 07-24-2007 at 01:24 AM.
Always need to use the same version, otherwise you may as well be comparring Aquamark to 3DMark2003.
All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.
14k with 1000 444?
you think you score the same as other people or less?
well show me some more of those 14k results :P
Here's a quote from an Asus Striker review:
"Everest measured a bit over 14,000 MB/s at Memory Read test, compare it to the 7764 MB/s it measured with default"
found here: http://it-review.net/index.php?optio...&limitstart=10
and this: Just read an artical at tomshardware and they oc"d an e6300 to 1940 fsb to get 3.4ghz and they"re Everest bench was over 14000.
found here: http://evga.com/forums/tm.asp?m=56159 (i cant find the Toms Hardware review atm)
Ive read others i will add them here if i find em again.
Last edited by Timbosan; 07-24-2007 at 02:00 AM.
that striker review is 7 months old...
you are using everest ultimate 2006
still kinda weird that newer versions of everest score lower than this old one... weird... maybe it was a bug in the old version?
well ddr2 CAN get close to these DDR3 scores but what you need is 1000+ 333 or 1300+ 444 i think
Bookmarks