I think my point was clear, and that was that he didn't have a clear oneSo what was it again? I cannot point to a better article, story, rumor if I can't even understand what he is trying to get across.
I don't know you but if you are desperate to link to an AMD apologist with funny blogs like "Core 2 Duo -- The Embarassing Secrets", "Intel's Chipsets -- The Roots Of Monopoly", "Intel -- The Monopoly Under Siege", "Anandtech Melts Down", "Q4 06 Intel and AMD: Who Won?", "AMD Q4 Earnings -- Good Or Bad?", "The Dishonesty of Overclocking", "Intel's Bluff (Q3 06 Results)", "Tigerton or Kittenton? Memory Amnesia.", well yeah, that speaks for itself![]()
Calm down little boyAnd please don't call me Scentia fanboy, or that reality will smack me in the face, or somenthing that dumb because, let me draw you a picture, just because i point out the redneck dumbasses that you are, that doesn't make me anything else.![]()



So what was it again? I cannot point to a better article, story, rumor if I can't even understand what he is trying to get across.

1. Where does this arbitrary 2.4Ghz K10 number keep coming from? 2. Also, how do you go about talking about Q2 first, then going about to Q1? Word to the wise, Sci is delusional and can't keep facts and fiction apart and never cites his numbers. So I guess the point of the article was that Sci thinks that AMD doesn't "need" 2.6GHz. Or maybe AMD can't clock them high enough.

Bookmarks