Results 1 to 21 of 21

Thread: should I do it? 2900XT for 8800GTS 640.

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    443

    should I do it? 2900XT for 8800GTS 640.

    I can sell my 8800GTS 640 for $410 CAD. People already want to buy it. I was thinking, should I sell it and get the 2900XT?


    I hate computers! : P


    oops I mean 8800gts 640 for 2900xt im tired :/
    Last edited by OpTioN; 06-10-2007 at 07:39 PM. Reason: Title Mistake

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,550
    are u on water with the 8800?

    get the 1gb ram 2900

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    295
    sell it now only if upgrading to a gtx

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    443
    Quote Originally Posted by KoHaN69 View Post
    are u on water with the 8800?

    get the 1gb ram 2900
    No i'm not... I could basicly get the GTS for the same price as the 2900XT If I sold it. so I could test it out and stuff.

    Allthough im not too sure on a few things... Will a OCZ GameXstream 600w handle it? and how loud do you think itll be in a lian li pc65? compared to the GTS.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,550
    afaik the 2900 has the same hsf mounts as the x1800/x1900 series, so u might find a cooler for cheap.

    However, the performance increase will not be significant, unless you're running and gaming on vista

    i'd recommend to wait for prices to drop on the 1gb ver of x2900

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    3,691
    No option, you shouldn't.

    Why trade up for a card that you'll lose performance when you kick on AA, has worse image quality, runs louder, and eats more juice?
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon2ky
    "dammit kyle what's with the 30 second sex lately?" "Sorry sweetie, I overclocked my nuts and they haven't been stable since"
    Quote Originally Posted by trinibwoy View Post
    I don't think his backside has internet access.
    Quote Originally Posted by n00b 0f l337 View Post
    Hey I just met you
    And this is crazy
    But I'm on bath salts
    And your face looks tasty

  7. #7
    Hardware Junkie
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Okinawa, Japan
    Posts
    917
    Quote Originally Posted by KoHaN69 View Post
    afaik the 2900 has the same hsf mounts as the x1800/x1900 series, so u might find a cooler for cheap.

    However, the performance increase will not be significant, unless you're running and gaming on vista

    i'd recommend to wait for prices to drop on the 1gb ver of x2900
    HSF is different and it's not as loud (specially the people that do not own one) make it out to bed. Your PSU might be enough but don't expect high OCs. And yes, wait for the 1GB version.

    Quote Originally Posted by DilTech View Post
    No option, you shouldn't.

    Why trade up for a card that you'll lose performance when you kick on AA, has worse image quality, runs louder, and eats more juice?
    It doesnt run louder, it doesnt run hotter, it does eat more juice but there isn't a stardard and it's like you'll have go out and get a 1KW PSU. I owned a 8800GTS 640MB and although it gave more fps according the game benches (i.e. FEAR) the game ran just as smooth with the HD2900XT and I couldn't tell the difference or even feel the HD2900XT slower. And if you like to 3DMark benching, the 8800GTS 640MB can't touch the HD2900XT.
    "You'll find happiness once you accept the inevitable or at least you won't be too pissed off" -- Me

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  8. #8
    Xtreme Recruit
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    98
    Quote Originally Posted by nicepun View Post
    HSF is different and it's not as loud (specially the people that do not own one) make it out to bed. Your PSU might be enough but don't expect high OCs. And yes, wait for the 1GB version.



    It doesnt run louder, it doesnt run hotter, it does eat more juice but there isn't a stardard and it's like you'll have go out and get a 1KW PSU. I owned a 8800GTS 640MB and although it gave more fps according the game benches (i.e. FEAR) the game ran just as smooth with the HD2900XT and I couldn't tell the difference or even feel the HD2900XT slower. And if you like to 3DMark benching, the 8800GTS 640MB can't touch the HD2900XT.
    Wouldn't it be better have higher FPS in games than get higher benchmark scores in 3dmark?

  9. #9
    Hardware Junkie
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Okinawa, Japan
    Posts
    917
    Quote Originally Posted by Phlash View Post
    Wouldn't it be better have higher FPS in games than get higher benchmark scores in 3dmark?
    That' why I said IF, and I also pointed out that although the 8800GTS 640MB yield more FPS during benchmarking the games, I couldn't tell the difference in performance. Also IQ could be subjective as for me ATi has better IQ.
    "You'll find happiness once you accept the inevitable or at least you won't be too pissed off" -- Me

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  10. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    132
    i was gonna but the 8800GTX 2 times, but ended up getting the 2900xt.

    Theres some 3rd party heatsinks coming out of Computex.

    If you have an intel chipset, you can crossfire, and have alot better performance than an 8800ultra overclocked but for alot less $$$.

    i think the fan is a little too loud in a quiet environment (i do have a sapphire 2900XT) and it does shoot out some warmy's too.

    Dont care about power usage coz all high end video cards do roughly the same.
    Idle is extremely good, super quiet and cool (using windows desktop stuff)

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    3,691
    Quote Originally Posted by nicepun View Post
    It doesnt run louder, it doesnt run hotter, it does eat more juice but there isn't a stardard and it's like you'll have go out and get a 1KW PSU. I owned a 8800GTS 640MB and although it gave more fps according the game benches (i.e. FEAR) the game ran just as smooth with the HD2900XT and I couldn't tell the difference or even feel the HD2900XT slower. And if you like to 3DMark benching, the 8800GTS 640MB can't touch the HD2900XT.
    Never said it runs hotter.

    It does run louder, just watch the guru3d video.

    Also, this guy already has the 8800GTS 640mb, which nets faster framerates in games, so what would be the point in selling it to get a HD 2900XT? Higher 3dmark scores? That's about as pointless as a pimp trying to pull a nun.
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon2ky
    "dammit kyle what's with the 30 second sex lately?" "Sorry sweetie, I overclocked my nuts and they haven't been stable since"
    Quote Originally Posted by trinibwoy View Post
    I don't think his backside has internet access.
    Quote Originally Posted by n00b 0f l337 View Post
    Hey I just met you
    And this is crazy
    But I'm on bath salts
    And your face looks tasty

  12. #12
    Xtreme Guru adamsleath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    3,803
    i s'pose if you were bored and want something to do.

    they'll charge even more for the 1gig version.

    some specific app's will run better on the 2900 i think..and some dont.

    sold a gts recently; they are popular for some reason

    cheap GTX (+20%ish performance) or wait until G92 GTS/X...(+50-100%ish?) i'm waiting for G92 GTS (christmas?) - when i'll sell my other 8800 GTS

    now i'm of to ebay to sell my 9136's wile their aus retail price is still high
    Last edited by adamsleath; 06-11-2007 at 01:48 PM.
    i7 3610QM 1.2-3.2GHz

  13. #13
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    660
    I think it's worth it ONLY IF you already have a 1KW PSU (room for another cheap X2900XT for INSANE performance) and if you have watercooling.

  14. #14
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    443
    Quote Originally Posted by Gunnz Akimbo View Post
    i was gonna but the 8800GTX 2 times, but ended up getting the 2900xt.

    Theres some 3rd party heatsinks coming out of Computex.

    If you have an intel chipset, you can crossfire, and have alot better performance than an 8800ultra overclocked but for alot less $$$.

    i think the fan is a little too loud in a quiet environment (i do have a sapphire 2900XT) and it does shoot out some warmy's too.

    Dont care about power usage coz all high end video cards do roughly the same.
    Idle is extremely good, super quiet and cool (using windows desktop stuff)
    Do you think there is anyway you can make a video of it's noise? I already heard the one of 2900's in CF but that dosen't really count cause it's 2 cards.

    If I sell it now I can get a fair price for it , if I keep it and wait for the 1gb version as much as I want to get it i'll only get like $330ish CAD for the GTS.

    Unless the 2900XT 1gb's are coming out soon.

  15. #15
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    390
    Quote Originally Posted by quicksilverXP View Post
    I think it's worth it ONLY IF you already have a 1KW PSU (room for another cheap X2900XT for INSANE performance) and if you have watercooling.
    Stupidest thing I have heard all day .
    Quote Originally Posted by amscott
    my freind is a proud owneer of an xbox 360. from wat he has told me, microsoft has secret built in devices that only are in the xbox and cannot be recreated. for instance he told me taht there is this little divise that is in the xbox 360 taht u cannot take out which if u play online and microsoft catches you hacking with this special chip thing that changes somthing in the games, microsoft will basicly sent a EMP pulse to your game system and fry it. :O because of these little part in the system, it is very difficult if not impossoble to modify the xbox with other parts because of the compatibility of the processor and (dashboard).

  16. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    53
    Totally agree with the above post.

    I would suggest you keep your 8800GTS 640MB.

    I've never liked ATI's move to the Catalyst driver set which forces you to install Microsoft's .net framework that ends up slowing down your whole computer.

    I just don't like it at all. Too bad you can't change GPUs in laptops (x700 in my notebook).

    I couldn't see why you wouldn't be happy with the card you have now. Multiple monitor and scaling support is, in my opinion, much better with nVidia graphics cards over ATI's and like people have said above it draws less power.

    This is important because of the environment and well, you might as well add the price of a new power supply to the cost of the 2900XT since the one you have now could possibly be insufficient for it.

    SOLID card all around and nVidia's graphics cards also have yet to see mature driver sets.

    I'm not all too familiar with ATI GPU vendors, but nVidia's vendors usually have great tech support and lifetime warranties.

    I suggest just using your videocard for whatever games you are playing now and see if it's "enough".

    If not then step up to a GTX, but don't change it up for an HD 2900XT.

    Cheers,
    Mike

  17. #17
    Xtreme X.I.P. Soulburner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    8,868
    Quote Originally Posted by Shampoo View Post
    I've never liked ATI's move to the Catalyst driver set which forces you to install Microsoft's .net framework that ends up slowing down your whole computer.
    Do you have any proof of this?
    System
    ASUS Z170-Pro
    Skylake i7-6700K @ 4600 Mhz
    MSI GTX 1070 Armor OC
    32 GB G.Skill Ripjaws V
    Samsung 850 EVO (2)
    EVGA SuperNOVA 650 G2
    Corsair Hydro H90
    NZXT S340

  18. #18
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    107
    Its true, you must install M$ .net framework 2.0, otherwise CCC won't start. I don't agree about the point its slowing down my whole computer though..

  19. #19
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    515
    id say its a waste of time and effort. If the two is so similar as nicepun said then why bother going for it if there isnt any noticable gain?
    Intel is like Egypt in Rome:total war

  20. #20
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    415
    Quote Originally Posted by Shampoo View Post
    I've never liked ATI's move to the Catalyst driver set which forces you to install Microsoft's .net framework that ends up slowing down your whole computer.
    CCC only gives you access to the more advanced features, something that ATI Tray Tools will do just fine. As far as I can tell, CCC has always been optional to install (I've used it once over the past 3-4+ years). While the CCC was slow as hell the last time I used it, CCC and the .NET framework didn't adversely effect my computer.

    edit: Sorry for hijacking...I guess I can contribute to the thread too

    I'd say if you want to take a gamble on the 2900 and play with 3dmark, go for it. As of now, the drivers are immature and as DilTech and others have pointed out, I wouldn't buy a card today that might outperform the competition at some undetermined time in the future, ESPECIALLY given the current climate in the graphics industry.
    Last edited by Heretic; 06-12-2007 at 06:51 AM.
    3800 X2 @ 2.7GHz
    DFI nf4 SLI-D
    2x1gb GSkill ZX
    TT Sonic Tower
    Visiontek 4850
    X-Fi XtremeMusic
    Corsair 750TX

  21. #21
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    36
    The crap people make up to slam ATI is awe inspiring. It is right up there with people making 'reviews' of cards they dont have.

    First you dont need a god given PSU for an ATI card. I used a 450 watt FSP psu on my XFX for a good OC. Try that on a Nvidia card and see if it doesn't give you a "power cord not connected' message.

    Second no you dont need Net framework except possibly for crossfire or simple convinence.

    Sound ATI might be louder with a sound meter but to many they are far less annoying than the ATI air raid siren you get with many of the Nvidia heatsinks.

    Sadly ATI is not as good at putting a good spin on ther products and often loose out to the marketing master even when they have a better product.



    The average user most likly will not see much diffrence between the GTS and the HD but overclocked and with the more recent drivers the ATI is a clear winner.

    Unfortunately many people seem only to do enough research to confirm their previous beliefs and therefore many only bothers with the most quickly released reviews that used older drivers.

    Yes the established review sites can not be expected to work on the weekends but when their results do not reflect the product as shipped they start to become pointless. I am expecting any performance oriented user to download the latest drivers not simply settle with the shipped and out dated ones like the review sites used.

    Do your self a favor and look at the posts of people that have the card and use the latest drivers it is a different world than the review site.

    I am considering the 1gb card that is expected soon but the high BS level is not making the choice easy.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •