Nuclearus - New Build - Benchmarks

[GOZ]

I got a little more out of it.......I wanted 2.8 but I got a weak core so 2.7 is as far as it go's.

[dj883u2]

Nice score buddy



Good one buddy..cheers



That's strange.....most guys get a higher score with version 2.0.

I notice your two matrix segments are really low on the version 2.0 run mate....perhaps an error?



great score mate

updated

The version 2.0 is decidedly slower.
Task is not an error, bat the two versions execute different tests.

Small improvement QX6700@3820Ghz:

NuclearMC.v.1.5.0.b2



By

[Kaze06]

Updated...

[F1N3ST]

Lol, a bad score, E6300 @ Stock
4X1GB 5-4-3-5 DDR2-800
P965t-a

5842
Checksum- EHDBGJHCAHFB.JIG

UPDATE



2324Mhz 1000Mhz RAM
7316
Max Board FSB=333 so no more lol I am gonna tweak my RAM though and come back.
Update2

Weird I put timings from 5-6-6-15 to 5-4-5-10 and gained one point lol, better than nothing though.
I did get top <2.7Ghz Dual core

[Lancer33]

Broke 8

[Rovtar]

my 7533

[Kaze06]

Lol, a bad score, E6300 @ Stock
4X1GB 5-4-3-5 DDR2-800
P965t-a

5842
Checksum- EHDBGJHCAHFB.JIG

UPDATE

2324Mhz 1000Mhz RAM
7316
Max Board FSB=333 so no more lol I am gonna tweak my RAM though and come back.
Update2
Weird I put timings from 5-6-6-15 to 5-4-5-10 and gained one point lol, better than nothing though.
I did get top <2.7Ghz Dual core

If all you can get out of that 6300 is 2.3, you definitely need a new board .

[dippyskoodlez]

Macbook pro 2.16Ghz merom.
I ran this in Vista using parallels, and its only capable of using a single core via virtualization at this point.

Does that mean I get to compete in the single core bracket?

EDIT: Oh yes, I just went there people, I'm benchmarking on a mac!

[ceemic]

E6400@3720MHz
2x1GB@465MHz@4-3-3-7
Gigabyte P35C-DS3R
11310

[F1N3ST]

If all you can get out of that 6300 is 2.3, you definitely need a new board .

Lol, if I put FSB over 333, windows locks up, I have to clockgen also, BIOS overclocking doesnt happen lol. Funny thing is I have like the best stepping E6300, L629A 6 B2, which has recently been proven 4Ghz 32M PI stable. I have about 170-200$ for an air cooler and board, any reccomendatiohns I was thinking a P965-s and some cooler?

[Calmatory]

Oeh.

Just a fast run with 2.2GHz NC. http://img217.imageshack.us/my.php?image=nucruspc4.png

Will see what my Windsor says about this.

[bizarre]

Hi SOLDNER-MOFO64, I thought I'd give you a bit more work to do by mirroring my E2160 results here as well as ocuk.



Well done on keeping both threads updated btw.

[uwackme]

An update:

[/IMG]

[Relax]

little score

[ceemic]

little update:
E6400@3774MHz
2x1GB@471MHz@4-3-3-7
Gigabyte P35C-DS3R
11445

[Relax]

little update:

[i found nemo]

half good or half bad? i dunno, i guess it's just okay

[Kashelz]

Good day everyone here is my result from Latvia I know I can hit 12.5k if I try harder



eVGA 680i rev.D mobo with P27
Xeon 3060 28B @ 3850 Mhz 428 x 9
2Gb Teamgroup PC5300 @ 856 4-4-4-8 1T
CPU on good watercooling!

[ceemic]

Good day everyone here is my result from Latvia I know I can hit 12.5k if I try harder

Nice score, "neighbour"

[Tsunami Fall]

Heres my score for the time being. Will push for a better one later

[CalabiYau]

Hi everyone,

My score for the time being is 13879.

System Specifications

Asus P5W DH Deluxe
Intel E6600 @ 3.7 GHz
Corsair XMS2 PC6400 @ 820 MHz
Zalman 9700
Seagate 320GB 16MB Cache NCQ
X1950 Pro with Zalman VF900Cu
Thermaltake VA8000SWA Armor

[ceemic]

Single Core:
Intel P4 631@5044MHz
2x1GB@465MHz@4-3-3-7
Gigabyte P35C-DS3R
6507

[freakBYnature]

Opteron 170 @ 2.8 GHz - 7372 Mark!

See Tsunami FALL over here gets less score than me with 50mhz more on cores, may be an actual proof of more cache meaning more!

[uwackme]

Gotta update the 1st post bunky.... new A64 record for me.... 9084!!!!

[Locki]

You must make a screenshot and attach image to your post
And use only "NMC v 2.0.0.0" but not 1.x.x. to be in TOP100
http://nuc-rus.narod.ru/stat.htm =)
So, we have a new champion:
15661 Gorod 2 Intel C2D X6800 5000 4-3-3-05 834