Nuclearus - New Build - Benchmarks

[Mad_Man]

Might we see 8K on an AMD soon?

MAYBE in soon time, im building my first WC loop so i hope for better clocks. But mem is holding me back, core can go higher but i have to set higher divider, so mem ends at 440 which's not good

[Jaan]

So, version has been updated to 2.0.0. rc1 [/url]

welcome to program autor
another link for fast download

[SOLDNER-MOFO64]

You want it, you get it lol

did litle tweakin'

MAYBE in soon time, im building my first WC loop so i hope for better clocks. But mem is holding me back, core can go higher but i have to set higher divider, so mem ends at 440 which's not good

I think we must have an ore each buddy, I'm in the same boat with you

Very nice score you've got there.. ..can't wait to see your water-cooled numbers

welcome to program autor

Indeed.....I never even noticed

[Mad_Man]

I think we must have an ore each buddy, I'm in the same boat with you

Very nice score you've got there.. ..can't wait to see your water-cooled numbers

I was in bed and cant sleep, thinking about it and...
...i went nuts...
set all fans to full blast, upped Vcore and Vmem a little and WHAT I GOT???

FIRST AMD 8K+

keep in mind this ram is curently running at 520Mhz, 5-5-5-9 2.3V and is rated at 333Mhz 4-4-4-9 2.1V

I feel good now, i can go sleep

btw, very nice progam this benchmark

[SOLDNER-MOFO64]

I was in bed and cant sleep, thinking about it and...
...i went nuts...
set all fans to full blast, upped Vcore and Vmem a little and WHAT I GOT???

FIRST AMD 8K+

keep in mind this ram is curently running at 520Mhz, 5-5-5-9 2.3V and is rated at 333Mhz 4-4-4-9 2.1V

I feel good now, i can go sleep

btw, very nice progam this benchmark

Congrats mate......klassic score

[Lancer33]

Why are there so many different version listed in the results. Does not seem like a valid example of performance when there is so much disparity between versions and older versions continue to be used after newer ones come out.

Anyway, pick the one you like:

[Mad_Man]

Congrats mate......klassic score

thanx man, its really a pleasure to see that big red text after my nick
i though it will bsod at thoose Mhz but yesterday was a cold night so it worked.

I hope with water it will be my 24/7 OC, now im running 24/7 at 3050/509
these new Brisbanes have big OC potential

[Hachi_Roku]

actual specs @cpu-z
moderate o/c

[dj883u2]

QX6700@3800Ghz:



By

[Locki]

dj883u2 and Hachi_Roku try it in new version (2.0.0.0)

[dj883u2]

New E6600@4100Ghz:



By

[Cheffy]

repost of my result from the OCUK forums (im registered as Amonlym there, as they banned Cheffy account for sig problem



athlon x2 4800+ (939) @ 3100@ 1.625v (12*258 ram at 258 3-3-3-8 1T) - suicide run, attempted at 3120 but locked up on multi thread

abit AX8 rev2, LCB9E X2 4800+, 2*1gig crucial pc4000

cooling is koolance 2pc601 w cpu305 (x1800xt and north bridge also in loop)

[Mad_Man]

congrats Cheffy, it looks like the extra cache helps here or maybe its because Brisbanes have higher latency L2.
Whats your 24/7_settings score?

[Cheffy]

7768, thats at 2920, (12*243).

i dont think ill be able to get anything else out of this cpu tho. 3124 locks up without fail in a few seconds. so i doubt 3112 will run...

can try the ram on a lower div, but 281 3-3-3-8 1T is asking a lot from 5B-F, my old sticks managed that, just. new ones dont seem to scale as well with volts tho, and there seems to be a mobo bug - setting 2.9v+ seems to sometimes give 3.25v for no reason, which is gonna kill the ram very quickly.

[SOLDNER-MOFO64]

7768, thats at 2920, (12*243).

i dont think ill be able to get anything else out of this cpu tho. 3124 locks up without fail in a few seconds. so i doubt 3112 will run...

can try the ram on a lower div, but 281 3-3-3-8 1T is asking a lot from 5B-F, my old sticks managed that, just. new ones dont seem to scale as well with volts tho, and there seems to be a mobo bug - setting 2.9v+ seems to sometimes give 3.25v for no reason, which is gonna kill the ram very quickly.

Nice one cheffy....great score.

I notice you're running an HTx of 4 still......have you tried dropping to 3x to see if it stops your lockups at 31++mhz? Just a thought

[FlawleZ]

My lowly A64 4000+

[SOLDNER-MOFO64]

My lowly A64 4000+

Scooped you number 3 spot for SC AMD, can't be bad

updated

[GOZ]

Here's mine with Utorrent and my antivirus running in the background, LMAO my Sig is way off

[Turrican]

//edit: i think we have a new AMD sc cpu record here

[SOLDNER-MOFO64]

Here's mine with Utorrent and my antivirus running in the background, LMAO my Sig is way off

good score, cheers

//edit: i think we have a new AMD sc cpu record here

Congrats buddy......very nice score indeed

updated

[uwackme]

Here's mine at 3.25Ghz.

[/IMG]

But at 3.5Ghz it hits 8853.

[Kaze06]

AMD Athlon XP 3200+ @ 2385MHz

[dj883u2]

E6600@4165Ghz:

NuclearMC.v.1.5.0.b2



NuclearMC.v.2.0.0RC1



By

[demonbane23]

Here we go --> x2 6000+ @ 3.3 --ill bench it at 3.4 in a bit... but so far

[SOLDNER-MOFO64]

Here's mine at 3.25Ghz. But at 3.5Ghz it hits 8853.

Nice score buddy

AMD Athlon XP 3200+ @ 2385MHz

Good one buddy..cheers

E6600@4165Ghz: By

That's strange.....most guys get a higher score with version 2.0.

I notice your two matrix segments are really low on the version 2.0 run mate....perhaps an error?

Here we go --> x2 6000+ @ 3.3 --ill bench it at 3.4 in a bit... but so far

great score mate

updated