Page 2 of 41 FirstFirst 1234512 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 1008

Thread: Official AMD Barcelona Thread

  1. #26
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    1,402
    Quote Originally Posted by bloodbanger View Post
    yeah final prices for me too
    So what's going to be the best choice:i'm upgrading my pc around september,when price-cuts C2D's happened for the 2nd time:Q6600/E6850 or one of those Kuma's???
    K10 is gonna be a better CPU

  2. #27
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,346
    There seems to have been a major clock speed increase from the previously stated 1.9GHz to 2.1GHz Agena chips. AMD has managed to increase the clock speed by 300MHz for the 89W TDP and 500MHz for the FX lineup, while keeping a very low "true" TDP (or has AMD converted yet?)

    Assuming the 40% improvement holds (should be true for the quad cores, maybe not as true for the dual cores),
    A 2.4GHz quad core Agena should equal a 3.36GHz Kentsfield
    A 2.6GHz quad core Agena FX should equal a 3.64GHz Kentsfield XE.
    A 2.8GHz dual core should equal a 3.9GHz Conroe

    This move surely means that these chips will be much more competitive with Penryn et al. However Penryn has the new vector SSE4 instructions (doesn't Agena only have a subset?), so in multimedia I would expect Penryn to win.
    Last edited by Shadowmage; 05-04-2007 at 07:52 AM.

  3. #28
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    304
    Quote Originally Posted by madcho View Post
    K10 is gonna be a better CPU
    Wonder if there are any brave souls to leak out K10 benchies

  4. #29
    Xtreme Member EternityZX9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Nursing Student -or- Beta Testing Escape From Tarkov
    Posts
    421
    Anyone care to guessimate the prices for the Phenom X4 @ 2.4Ghz or the Phenom X2 @ 2.8Ghz?

    What ballpark price ranges are we talking about here? $1000? $800? $500 for the Phenom X4?

    $500+ for the Phenom X2?

    And, also is it now confirmed these processors are coming out Q3 instead of the abysmal Q4 or Q1 2008 predictions some people were talking about?

  5. #30
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    prospekt Veteranov, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
    Posts
    494
    XeRo
    we are aware of spec_int/fp-rates, sandra and 3dmark

  6. #31
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    1,990
    Quote Originally Posted by madcho View Post
    K10 is gonna be a better CPU
    Got any benchmarks to back up that statement?
    Heatware: 50-0-0
    Quote Originally Posted by Charile
    I believe that GWB, who may NOT be the best overclocking CPU in the tray...
    Quote Originally Posted by -thc-(cZ) View Post
    oh c'mon, maxxx, kick that cat of that monitor and have it poop for you

  7. #32
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    1,990
    Quote Originally Posted by |JACK- View Post
    this is not an intel vs amd discussion so no backups needed.
    So that gives you the green light to make baseless statements. Didn't know that was the policy around here.
    Heatware: 50-0-0
    Quote Originally Posted by Charile
    I believe that GWB, who may NOT be the best overclocking CPU in the tray...
    Quote Originally Posted by -thc-(cZ) View Post
    oh c'mon, maxxx, kick that cat of that monitor and have it poop for you

  8. #33

  9. #34
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by MAS View Post
    XeRo
    we are aware of spec_int/fp-rates, sandra and 3dmark
    Currently we only seen SpecFp_rate and a another transaction bench. Sofar I recall all 3dmark has been fake and I have seen specint or sandra.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  10. #35
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadowmage View Post
    There seems to have been a major clock speed increase from the previously stated 1.9GHz to 2.1GHz Agena chips. AMD has managed to increase the clock speed by 300MHz for the 89W TDP and 500MHz for the FX lineup, while keeping a very low "true" TDP (or has AMD converted yet?)

    Assuming the 40% improvement holds (should be true for the quad cores, maybe not as true for the dual cores),
    A 2.4GHz quad core Agena should equal a 3.36GHz Kentsfield
    A 2.6GHz quad core Agena FX should equal a 3.64GHz Kentsfield XE.
    A 2.8GHz dual core should equal a 3.9GHz Conroe

    This move surely means that these chips will be much more competitive with Penryn et al. However Penryn has the new vector SSE4 instructions (doesn't Agena only have a subset?), so in multimedia I would expect Penryn to win.

    You do know, that your magic 40% comes from specFp_rate that K8 already beat Conroe at with about 20%?

    K10 got 6 instructions of the 42 or so. They call it SSE4A. AMD is not allowed to make a full implementation till until after a certain time. (6-12months).
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  11. #36
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    1,402
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    You do know, that your magic 40% comes from specFp_rate that K8 already beat Conroe at with about 20%?

    K10 got 6 instructions of the 42 or so. They call it SSE4A. AMD is not allowed to make a full implementation till until after a certain time. (6-12months).
    But AMD has SSE128

  12. #37
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by madcho View Post
    But AMD has SSE128
    So do Conroe.

    Also, unless you are doing DIVX all day etc. Then it wont give you 40%.

    To compare Core Duo had 1 two cycle SSE unit. Conroe got 3 single cycle SSE units. Yet Conroe with all other enchancements is about 20% faster.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  13. #38
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by |JACK- View Post
    you see, omg
    Oh I forgot. Lets throw reality away. Yes K10 will beat Conroe and Penryn with 500% and revolutionize the entire tech industry. We will get a whole new epoke in human history!

    Then we all woke up of the dream
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  14. #39
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    65
    Phenom, the name says it all. Just like "Athlon" which made up to it's name.

    Athlon is the greek word for "contest " or " prize/reward ". Depends on the interpretation.

    Phenom is a slang for Phenomena, which means an "impressive or remarkable" thing. It got to be something.

    Athlon 64 X2 4200+ @ 2800Mhz
    Zalman CNPS9500
    Asus M2N-E
    2GB PQI DDRII @ 800Mhz CL5
    Asus GeForce 7900GT @ 550/1520
    18x DVD Burner
    Maxtor 120GB IDE
    WD 160GB SATA
    Iiyama Vision Master Pro 410



    Saving for Phenom X4

  15. #40
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,755
    Quote Originally Posted by madcho View Post
    Too bad those are nowhere near the benchs we wan't to see.

  16. #41
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by madcho View Post
    Kinda odd they dont even bench vs the same OS:

    SPECint®_rate2006 2P Servers

    2 Xeon 5355 processors in FSC Primergy RX300 S3, 16GB memory, 73GB SAS disk drive, Microsoft Windows®Server 2003 x64 Enterprise http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/...219-00524.html
    2 AMD Opteron™ processors Model 2222 SE in Tyan Thunder n4250QE motherboard, 8GB memory, 80GB SATA disk drive, SuSE Linux® Enterprise Server 9 SP3 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/...319-00684.html
    2 Xeon processors 5160 in FSC PRIMERGY TX300 S3, 16GB memory, 73GB SAS disk drive, Windows® 2003 Server Enterprise Edition SP1 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/...122-00249.html
    2 Xeon 5355 processors in FSC Primergy RX300 S3, 16GB memory, 73GB SAS disk drive, 64-Bit SUSE LINUX® Enterprise Server 10 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/...219-00523.html
    2 AMD Opteron™ processors Model 2222 SE in Tyan Thunder n4250QE motherboard, 8GB memory, 80GB SATA disk drive, SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 9 SP3 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/...319-00685.html
    2 Xeon processors 5160 in FSC PRIMERGY TX300 S3, 16GB memory, 73GB SAS disk drive, 64-bit SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/...122-00250.html
    And the specs of the K10 aint nowhere to see.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  17. #42
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    781
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    Kinda odd they dont even bench vs the same OS:



    And the specs of the K10 aint nowhere to see.
    Also: "estimated" Performance.
    Computer:
    Case: Corsair 750D Airflow Edition
    Mobo: Gigabyte Aorus X570 Ultra
    RAM: Team TForce Xtreem ARGB 3600C14 2x16gb XMP
    CPU: AMD Ryzen 5900x
    Graphics: EVGA (rip) RTX 3080 FTW3
    PSU: Seasonic Focus GX 850w
    Cooling: Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360mm
    NVMe: SKHynix P41 Platinum, Samsung 980 Pro 2tb
    SSD: Micron 1100 2TB, Samsung 860 Evo 1tb
    HDD: WD SE 2TB, WD Black 1tb 3 platter with over 10 years of power-on time

  18. #43
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by breakfromyou View Post
    Also: "estimated" Performance.
    Ye, well...we just have to be patient and wait for the real benches...
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  19. #44
    Charcoal or propane?
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    1,299
    alright: are you pronouncing Phenom as "fee-nom" or as in the word "venom".

    I'm in the fee-nom camp.
    DFI UT X58-T3eH8 (being replaced with Giga UD5)
    Core i7 920 D0 mostly stable @ 4Ghz
    TRUE 120
    6GB OCZ Platinum 7-7-7 (still in testing
    XFX 4890 1GB @ 1050/1190
    Corsair HX850W
    CM Cosmos S

    Still testing...

  20. #45
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    4,743
    What happened to the other AMD thread? I had posted some good info in that thread.


    Asus Z9PE-D8 WS with 64GB of registered ECC ram.|Dell 30" LCD 3008wfp:7970 video card

    LSI series raid controller
    SSDs: Crucial C300 256GB
    Standard drives: Seagate ST32000641AS & WD 1TB black
    OSes: Linux and Windows x64

  21. #46
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    It went away after ppl started crapping it...much like Shintai, Jack and Thunderstruck intend to do here.

    Perkam

  22. #47
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by perkam View Post
    It went away after ppl started crapping it...much like Shintai, Jack and Thunderstruck intend to do here.

    Perkam
    Well, its hard not to go that way when poeple start the hype and imagination engine.

    PS3, RD600, R600 and Conroe+Penryn all took that path lately. Nobody seems to object when someone hypes it up. But if someone disagree to get back to a sane level its all crapping, fanboism and more

    Lets look...
    PS3 wasnt the super killer console.
    RD600 didnt clock and perform in a godlike fashion.
    R600 seems to be a 8800GTS competitor now.
    Conroe didnt perform 50% better, but more like 20%.
    Penryn wont be 4Ghz.

    And we could go on. Yet its blasphamy to say K10 wont be the miracle on earth.

    So perhaps crapping should be defined when people mix dreams with reality
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  23. #48
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,125

    THIS is not a good sign for Barcelona performance

    AMD management is telling whoppers to shareholders about why they are not releasing any actual Barcelona benchmarks.

    http://www.investorshub.com/boards/r...ge_id=19393127

    i cracked up listening to hector's and dirk's response to a shareholder's question about why they aren't painting the world with barc info.

    the answer was that if barc info was public, powerful, fast-follower intel could come up with a competitive response too quickly.

    any shareholder who believes that crap deserves what they get.

    if amd really has something unique it would take a product cycle for intel to respond. if it isn't unique and merely some "innovative" benchmarking they're toast anyway.

  24. #49
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    772
    And yet how many people here believe EVERYTHING that comes out of ol Hector and Dirk's mouths like it is the Gospel?

    All execs are lying. If they weren't good liars, they wouldn't be good execs.

  25. #50
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dallas, TX USA
    Posts
    1,381
    i think all these news posts should be locked with the information post only, speculation discussions should be moved to another topic/forum...

    only posts that should be allowed in a news topic should be limited to:
    saying it's a repost
    posting links that disprove the topic
    posting links proving the topic
    and/or posting links that enhance the topic
    Athlon XP-M 2500+ 0343MPMW The King is Dead!
    Phenom II X6 1090T 1025GPMW Long Live the King!

    -------------------------------------------
    I'm from the church of the operating room

Page 2 of 41 FirstFirst 1234512 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •