sesdave, of course it's not guaranteed, that's what I was trying to say all along. Weldzilla comes in and flaunts his overclocks as if it's a foregone conclusion (no offense, that's what it looks like to me

). You got to work to get it, you know

I did lots to hit 400fsb - I installed watercooling, I did NB/SB cooling mod, w/o which the most I could do 367fsb.
Now, while my chip doesn't take much voltage, it does pump loads of heat - it's a B-series chip, after all

I do have somewhat puny single heatercore with 2fans in push/pull config, and still the cpu heats up to 52-54 load @ 3.6ghz with room temp around 20-22C.
Well, "breaking" was a feeling I got when the comp started to reboot and freeze on me after that experimental run at 3825mhz. I did a 5 hours + run of orthos and at that point I started taking screenshots, manipulating them in windows paint, when computer crashed. Before that, I had no trouble loading windows at 425fsb (would not load at 430 and wouldn't boot at 435) with vcore 1.525, mch 1.75, mem 2.05. Now, with vcore 1.6, mch 1.85 and mem 2.2 it won't load windows @ 425fsb (still boots). Also, the previously rock-solid overclock at 400fsb won't stick, I had to change mch to 1.75 to make it stable again - with old setting of mch 1.65 it freezes or reboots. Vcore still 1.4, works fine.
I'm using 1602 bios and frankly, don't want to experiment with changing it. One reason is that I don't have a floppy (had to make unattended install with integrated raid drivers even) and another - what if the newer bios turns out worse for me and I can't go back?... if there was an easy way to switch between them... Any suggestions? If I really need it I guess I could snatch an external floppy...
My chips are definitely D9GMH, it's OCZ 8500, I even checked them physically, there's a bump in the middle

I'm able to do 2:3 ratio below 400fsb but once with 400, it won't do anything above 1:1. Dunno why... I'll read that thread, see if something comes up.
Bookmarks