Hey Vince.....How's that?....

[Boble76]

You have a little competition here, haha! GJ

[funkflix]

Great result hipro5!

I saw you on Cebit too. I was the big guy with short hair on your right, on sunday afternoon.

[hipro5]

Thank you all guys.....

This week I will rest a bit.....Next week we will have some action.....

Nice to meet you guys in person...

[blind_ripper]

great work vince and george , it looks like last years dothan battle is about to restart .

[Vullf]

hipro5
I was at CeBIT to At saturday
Lol i just thought "wtf? isnt that Hipro5? it is!"

[hipro5]

great work vince and george , it looks like last years dothan battle is about to restart .

Yes, I hope so.....

hipro5
I was at CeBIT to At saturday
Lol i just thought "wtf? isnt that Hipro5? it is!"

[SoF]

looks like a nice race coming up, what a pitty I can just be a viewer and can't take part

Ahhh btw: Don't smoke too much

[Vullf]

http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/1747/img1153cp5.jpg
Nice score btw ^^

[hipro5]

http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/1747/img1153cp5.jpg
Nice score btw ^^

Not quite good though..... I got about the same at 4794MHz....

[Vullf]

Not quite good though..... I got about the same at 4794MHz....

For me its good enough

[kemo]

Not quite good though..... I got about the same at 4794MHz....

No fatties @ Cebit

[hipro5]

No fatties @ Cebit

No.....I have given them with my ABIT AW9D-MAX mobo to German overclockers to play....so I couldn't test them at all.....I will do so, coz I'm interested of how they do in 2k5 at 4800MHz compared to the others....

On German O/C booth, my FatBodies did about 1200MHz on an ASUS P5W64 and i975 chipset with Cas 4 - 3 - 3 - 8......Of caurse the resault was worse or ~equal with Cas 3 - 2 - 2 - x.....

[nikolas61]

great score

[kemo]

Just a little bump


Aquamark SLI WR 262820 point

Core 2 Duo X6800 @ 5362MHz on IN9 x32 MAX - SLI 8800GTX @ 808/1188 - CPU under LN2 (Gorillakos Pot) and VGA under k|ngp|in`s Tek-9 LN2 Pots - Rams Powered by DDR Maximizer

First Hipro5 3D03 run under LN2 (not maximized yet) 80907 3DMarks

Core 2 Duo X6800 @ 5200MHz on IN9 x32 MAX - SLI 8800GTX @ 808/1100 - CPU under LN2 with Gorillakos pot and VGAs under LN2 with k|ngp|n`s Tek-9 pots - Corsair 8000UL Rams powered by a DDR Maximizer

CPU under LN2 with Gorillakos pot - Corsair 8000UL Fatbodies and 1:1 Linked with Cas 3 - 2 - 2 - 4 - 1T - 8 - 21 - 1 - 6 - 2 - 7,8us at 2.71Vdimm via a DDR Maximizer - VGAs under LN2 at 808MHz Core and 1100MHz rams - JUST Testing for now and NOT A GOOD RUN... ;o)

verification link

And more to come soon with some 5.4GHZ action

[hipro5]

He, he, he......Thanks......but just testing and not tweaked yet....

I can finaly bench this ABIT IN9 at 5405MHz with my X6800

BIG problem though is the QUAD CPU....I tested at 5200MHz on it BUT with 2 cores at 5200MHz and 2 cores at 4000MHz - x13multi for two cores and x 10 multi for other two - .....ABIT bios is not ready yet to overclock 4 x cores together and it leaves the 2 cores at x10 multi and the other two at the multi we have picked.....
CPU score was about 6200 points and I loose about 800 - 1000 marks on 2k6 from that.....TOO MUCH....

I could gain them - well not all of them - by the VGAs at 975MHz / 1215MHz BUT I whould be almost at the edge of the score....

I think I'll get an EVGA mobo to bench the 2k6 benchmark coz I HAVE to bench any time soon and ABIT's bios engineers are not taking care of the QUAD CPUs and their overclocking.....

Are the EVGAs mobos good or should I go back to the ASUS Striker one - that I do not want to, due to bad memories of it - ?.....


I ALSO have tested 2 x 1GB rams with the Micron GKX chips....
Observations:

At 1:1 with Cas 3 - 3 - 3 - 4 - 1T - 1 - 17 - 1 - 6 - 2 - 7.8us and about 415MHz, CAN'T BE TOUCHED as for 3Ds from playing Unlinked with the same fsb and Rams at 622MHz and Cas 4 - 3 - 3 - 4 - 2T - 1 - 21 - 1 - 6 - 2 - 7.8us.....The rams that I've tested, are the Team Group 1200s....
In 2k1, 2k3, 2k5, the Corsair 8000UL Fatbodies at 415MHz with Cas 3 - 2 - 2 - 3 - 1T - 8 - 21 - 1 - 6 - 2 - 7.8us, are the WINNERS.....

Example: Lobby High at 3600MHz and rams at 400MHz (fsb too):
Fatbodies = 380 marks
Team Group = 364.5 marks
4 x 1GB Rams (2 x 1GB Team Group and 2 x 1GB CellShocks) at 400MHz with Cas 3 - 3 - 3 - 4 - 1T - 1 - 21 - 1 - 6 - 2 - 7.8us = 362.5marks

ALSO TRC = 1 and TRC = 8 might be the EXACT same thing.....I think that TRC = 1 is ONLY for the "eyes" and nothing more....It "seems" to stress a bit the i680 BUT in real, does nothing......Could someone test it as for Super-Pi too?....

Thought I'll do more testing...

[kemo]

Thanks for proving that fatties are faster than 2X1GB 600MHZ 4-3-3-4 anyway looking @ your 80K run the GT2 , GT3 bug still there. i thought that this problem was solved (sorry for the bad photoshop skills )

[blind_ripper]

il see george
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y90...z275vmem-1.jpg
on 975X chipset and thees are D9GMH .
2.75vdimm

[G H Z]

GT2 , GT3 bug still there

1GB vs 2GB may be hurting in those tests, hipro have you tested that?

[gandalfone]

Excuse hiopro I don't understand, you support that mem in 1:1 at Cas 3 - 2 - 2 - 3 - 1T - 8 - 21 - 1 - 6 - 2 - 7.8us are better than mem unlinked at 622Mhz?? or do you play all mem at 400Mhz with various timing??

soo...I quote kemo6600...there are problem with run the GT2 , GT3

[hipro5]

Thanks for proving that fatties are faster than 2X1GB 600MHZ 4-3-3-4 anyway looking @ your 80K run the GT2 , GT3 bug still there. i thought that this problem was solved (sorry for the bad photoshop skills )

Fatties CAN'T be touched on i680.......I've tested ALL combinations on it....with Rams and frequencies and timmings and subtimmings etc.....Fatbodies can't be touched.....and don't start telling me that high frequency rams doing better, coz I've been there, I've done it....

The BEST though, it whould be 4 x 512MB Fatbodies.....I'll test it this week if my fourth module can follow....

......and YES as I described my 2k3 score was not good coz it was a fast bench (out of LN2)......You have to reboot - bench - reboot - bench - till the 2k3 "gives" you the BEST score......

1GB vs 2GB may be hurting in those tests, hipro have you tested that?

NOPE......I have tested EVERYTHING.....

I have tested:

2 x 512MB Corsair 8000UL Fatbodies at 1:1 and Cas 3 - 2 - 2 - 3 - 1T - 8 - 21 - 1 - 6 - 2 - 7.8us

2 x 1GB Team Group 1200 GKX at 1:1 and Cas 3 - 3 - 3 - 4 - 1T - 1(or 8) - 17 - 1 - 6 - 2 - 7.8us

2 x 1GB Team Group 1200 GKX at 621MHz (1242MHz DDR) and Cas 4 - 3 - 3 - 4 - 2T - 1(or 8) - 21 - 1 - 6 - 2 - 7.8us

4 x 1GB - 2 x 1GB Team Group + 2 x 1GB CellShock GKX at 1:1 and Cas 3 - 3 - 3 - 4 - 1T - 1 (or 8) - 21 - 2 - 6 - 2 - 7.8us

4 x 1GB - 2 x 1GB Team Group + 2 x 1GB CellShock GKX at 600MHz and Cas 4 - 3 - 3 - 4 - 2T - 1 (or 8) - 21 - 2 - 6 - 2 - 7.8us

Tell me what more do you want me to test and I'll do it......I can test whatever you wish......

I WANT to test 4 x 512MB Fatbodies but I have 3 modules that can do high and I'm searching for a fourth one..... ......I think that this combination whould be the BEST.....

Excuse hipro I don't understand, you support that mem in 1:1 at Cas 3 - 2 - 2 - 3 - 1T - 8 - 21 - 1 - 6 - 2 - 7.8us are better than mem unlinked at 622Mhz?? or do you play all mem at 400Mhz with various timing??

soo...I quote kemo6600...there are problem with run the GT2 , GT3

Yes, rams (Fatbodies) at 415MHz at 1:1 with the timmings you quoted above, are faster than rams at 622MHz and Cas 4 - 3 - 3 - 4 - 2T - 1 (or 8) - 1 - 6 - 2 - 7.8us.....
ALSO GKXs at 1:1 and Cas 3 - 3 - 3 - 4 - 1T - 1 (or 8) - 17(or 19) - 1 - 6 - 2 - 7.8us are FASTER than Rams (Unlinked) at 622MHz with Cas 4 - 3 - 3 - 4 - 2T - 1 (or 8) - 1 - 6 - 2 - 7.8us......As for 3D ......Super-Pi I don't know coz I haven't tested yet on the i680 chipset - though some time I'll give it a try........

[Enoc]

hipro5
fatbodies are very impressive , gives d9gmh and gkx a good run
what memory straps did you use apart from 1:1...? 2:3? 3:5? 4:5?
and did you test your fatbodies over 600mhz? let's say comparing them at 6xxmhz vs 4xxmhz...
and did you test 4-2-3-4 4:5 with your fatbodies? it's faster then 3-2-2-* or 3-2-3 1:1 at the same bus speed...

[hipro5]

hipro5
fatbodies are very impressive , gives d9gmh and gkx a good run
what memory straps did you use apart from 1:1...? 2:3? 3:5? 4:5?
and did you test your fatbodies over 600mhz? let's say comparing them at 6xxmhz vs 4xxmhz...
and did you test 4-2-3-4 4:5 with your fatbodies? it's faster then 3-2-2-* or 3-2-3 1:1 at the same bus speed...

For the Fatbodies I use the 533 Strap within bios.......For all the others, I use 1066 Strap.....

No I didn't tested my Faties at 600MHz comparing to others....
4 - 2 - 2 - x is a bit slower than 3 - 2 - 2 - x .....Propably due to some internal latency changings of the i680 chipset when picking the 4 instead of the 3 ....
I'll do some more tests though coz I want to be well prepared for my 3Ds....

[s7e9h3n]

[B]Fatties CAN'T be touched on i680.......

Seems that way to me too.....Albeit it was a little while ago and I just tested at 1m, but result after result from my 2x512mb Fatties were shockingly similar to runs @ the same clockspeed but higher memory speeds using 2x1gb GMH on the 680i. Here's a little example of what I'm talking about:

2x512mb @ 450 4-3-2-4-1-10-22-2-7-2-7.8




2x1gb @ 600 4-3-3-4-2-1-20-2-6-2-7.8



It was quite crazy how my $65 kit of Crucial Fatties bought off Ebay at least a year ago was consistently keeping up with a pair of VERY HANDPICKED Team GMH's which cost a "bit" more than $65

Hehehe George...it seems as if Victor's runs have gotten into your head abit

[Sampsa]

hipro, in my tests Asus Striker Extreme performed better than EVGA's nForce 680i SLI mobo, although EVGA's motherboard seemed to be more problem free.

[Fr3ak]

Looking at you 1m time Stephen, I didnt think 680i would be that much slower than X975. I get 12.866 using Win 2k3 and a single 1Gb stick of GSkill HZ 800 at 445Mhz 4 4 3 8 8T 19 6 8 8 4 4 4.

How much of a difference does it make by using quality ram and tight timings compared to "normal" stuff with moderate timings for 3D benching?
I make some quick test using 03, but the difference was negligible.