Micron DDR2-667 2G*2
tested on Asus P5B-deluxe wifi/ap mod, and Foxconn nv680i.
More here: http://vic.expreview.com/read.php?102
on Asus P5B-dlx
ddr2-780 3338
ddr2-900 4338
ddr2-933 4435
ddr2-960 4445
on Foxconn nv680i
ddr2-800 4328 1t
ddr2-1000 4338 2t
ddr2-1022 5338 2t
nice work man. i just saw some d9ftb float past me anyway what voltage are you using?
Amd Nvidia/Ati -3dmark06 scorebord revisted
asus L1N64-ws or /b depending on bios chip
4x1gig 8500 gkill bpk
2x opteron 8224 @ 3.8ghz
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=236
vga= 8800gt
winxp pro
custom chiller -31 water
2x dtek fuzions
bix3-with x3panaflo hi output
antec 850 quattro
heat under msimax abitmax and dfimax
awsome
________
BUY HERBALAIRE VAPORIZER
Last edited by billdavis; 03-08-2011 at 07:48 PM.
Those are 1Gbit Fatbody ICs. Very nice results.
As your say 667 D9 FTB, then is that a DQT right?
anybody, what do you think the diffrence among the DQT & DQW about performance.
DQT is better than DQW ? and the diffrence of product line 11 and 32 ?
Originally Posted by r00n
Those are 1Gbit Fatbody ICs. Very nice results.
These are not traditional fat bodies. Even the production date will tell you that if nothing else did.
I'm assuming these are just Micron's latest offering in the 128MB IC market.
Formerly XIP, now just P.
those FTB MT doesn't make it anymore
Don't tell me you've forgotten why Fatbodies are called Fatbodies.Originally posted by EnJoY
These are not traditional fat bodies. Even the production date will tell you that if nothing else did.
I'm assuming these are just Micron's latest offering in the 128MB IC market.
They were called Fatbodies because their dimensions were 19x11mm, typical for Micron BT-x ICs.
D9FTB is also part of the BT-family, its dimensions are also 19x11mm, therefore they are Fatbodies.
It has nothing to do with overclockability or comparability to other Fatbody ICs.
Last edited by Rone; 03-10-2007 at 11:39 AM.
Those are 1Gbit Fatbody ICs. Very nice results.
No no...I realize this. However, when you say Fatbody around here, everyone gets a certain idea about what chips from what generation you're referring too. I just wanted to clarify that these weren't double density D9DQT.
Formerly XIP, now just P.
Hmm...maybe Victor should give the story behind these before we all make anymore incorrect assumptions then.
Formerly XIP, now just P.
Sadly enough, that is true.Originally posted by EnJoY
No no...I realize this. However, when you say Fatbody around here, everyone gets a certain idea about what chips from what generation you're referring too.
So did I. Guess it has been cleared up, then.I just wanted to clarify that these weren't double density D9DQT.
Last edited by Rone; 03-10-2007 at 11:49 AM.
lol....D9FTB has the same size as D9DQT/D9DQW.
but...not the same overclk ability, neither timings/clks.
I think it maybe 2*Small D9 combine together
I got this pair from a mobo RD, and u cannot find info. for D9FTB on Micon's website.
it's micron send to some mobo vendor for compability test, I think.
Of course you can. It's right here: http://www.micron.com/products/partd...MT47H128M8BT-3Originally posted by VictorWang
I got this pair from a mobo RD, and u cannot find info. for D9FTB on Micon's website.
...And those are not D9FTB...
Click on extra link in OP, all tests 2.6V.
actually i bought this at early 2006 when fat9 still around from egg. then they stop all fat (include this 128x8) and move to new genlol....D9FTB has the same size as D9DQT/D9DQW.
but...not the same overclk ability, neither timings/clks.
I think it maybe 2*Small D9 combine together
I got this pair from a mobo RD, and u cannot find info. for D9FTB on Micon's website.
it's micron send to some mobo vendor for compability test, I think.
According to Micron they are. Do you have a better source?Originally posted by skate2snow
...And those are not D9FTB...
lol...then I must did a wrong search
sorry
hmm, It seems better than D9HNL..what did you use voltage?
"We are competing, competing to win. And the main motivation is to compete for victory" - Ayrton Senna
I think that pic is of the ES. Micron uses different codes for their ES samples, such as Z9 = D9.lol...then I must did a wrong search
sorry
Formerly XIP, now just P.
No. DDR2 Engineering Samples generally have a Z9xxx FBGA-code, but the Part Number will always have 'ES' in it, as shown in this picture:
This is not the case with D9FTB, which simply isn't an ES.
could you tell us which voltage you were using?
I think he stated 2.6v somewhere above. I just snagged 2 2GB stick of this stuff on ebay. I'll post results when I test it. Got it for $278 so I think I got a decent deal for a 4GB kit.could you tell us which voltage you were using?
Any more updates on these rams guys ? I know its nearly a year on from the last posts but I just traded a pair of 2GB Kingston 667 with D9FTB chips , so Im keen to see if they perform.
Last edited by aussie-revhead; 01-18-2008 at 03:16 AM.
Bencher/Gamer(1) 4930K - Asus R4E - 2x R9 290x - G.skill Pi 2200c7 or Team 2400LV 4x4GB - EK Supreme HF - SR1-420 - Qnix 2560x1440
Netbox AMD 5600K - Gigabyte mitx - Aten DVI/USB/120Hz KVM
PB 1xTitan=16453(3D11), 1xGTX680=13343(3D11), 1x GTX580=8733(3D11)38000(3D06) 1x7970=12059(3D11)40000(vantage)395k(AM3) Folding for team 24
AUSTRALIAN DRAG RACING http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFsbfEIy3Yw
Make sure to post some results yourself!Any more updates on these rams guys ? I know its nearly a year on from the last posts but I just traded a pair of 2GB Kingston 667 with D9FTB chips , so Im keen to see if they perform.
![](http://www.hwbot.org/signature/u15466.png height="110" )
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks