well hdtach is quick, simple and universal. not everyone uses the same AV or plays the same games or uses the same video encoding software.
well hdtach is quick, simple and universal. not everyone uses the same AV or plays the same games or uses the same video encoding software.
e6850 @ 3.6Ghz
TT TRUE lapped
evga 680i
Lian Li PC-60B plus II
2x eVGA 7950GT KO's
2GB Ballistix DDR2-1066
PCP&C 750w Silencer
SB Audigy2 ZS
20" SyncMaster 204B
2x WD 160gig sataII's RAID-0
My Heatware 25-0-0
My testing ....
![]()
and is UNRELIABLE and does NOT indicate real word performance.......you will see when you do the tests
well you seem to be the only one who has a problem with it, meanwhile the thread continues around your noncontributing rants.Originally Posted by dinos22
Last edited by scarface; 02-10-2007 at 08:06 AM.
e6850 @ 3.6Ghz
TT TRUE lapped
evga 680i
Lian Li PC-60B plus II
2x eVGA 7950GT KO's
2GB Ballistix DDR2-1066
PCP&C 750w Silencer
SB Audigy2 ZS
20" SyncMaster 204B
2x WD 160gig sataII's RAID-0
My Heatware 25-0-0
sorry
my hd are 34 a piece my mistake
QFT! (This thread is not about comparing performance but about gaining consensus on whether an issues exists with RAID on 680i)Originally Posted by scarface
It definitely seems like something is throttling STR. If the HD Tach curve does not taper off in a natural curve and is flat all the way across, then something is getting saturated and/or throttling data transfer. The curve should naturally taper off as the heads move from the outer cylinders of the platers to the inner.
It seems like the majority of EVGA boards and at least one ABIT board suffer from this problem.![]()
Some more Striker RAID performance curves would be helpful.
Perhaps there is a potential issue with 680i RAID performance depending on how the manufacturer implements it (BIOS/board layout/etc)?
Last edited by virtualrain; 02-11-2007 at 02:38 AM.
look like Lestat pointed out earlier that's what these "raid" controllers are supposed to do....all the peak measurements and other gimicks HD and other software do doesn't exactly translate into mindbogling real life performance hence why i'm telling you to do some real world testsOriginally Posted by scarface
these raid controllers are not really true raid controllers but i hope you guys know about that right? if you want true raid performance you need to buy yourself a dedicated PCI Express 8x raid controller (EXAMPLE) with 2 or 4 Ultra320 15K SCSI drivers in Raid0. Only then will you actually get the hard drive performance that is good for 300 or greater I/Os per sec and some nice seek times but it will cost an arm and a let and it will be hot and loud like you wouldn't believe...yeah i've run multiple 15K scsi in the dual xeon days and i still build high end workstations with people demand peak performance in HDD speeds particularly
you guys are kidding yourselves with raid setups on any of these desktop motherboards....the only raid useful on them is Raid1 so you can at least protect yourself from a single drive failure and nothing else
what we need are solid state disks.....hopefully 2008 will bring some joy toHDD performance and main bottleneck in PCs today
![]()
Abit IN9MAX
2 x 74 GB raptors
![]()
Board: DFI LanParty UT X58-T3eH8 (2009-02-17)
CPU: Intel Core i7-920 Batch:3835A799
RAM: Corsair TR3X6G1866C9DF 3x2GB Dominator 9-9-9-24 1866 1.65V Triple Channel
GPU: ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
Sound: onboard
HDD: 3x30GB OCZ Vertex RAID0 , 2X300GB VelociRaptor RAID0
DVD: Samsung SATA DVD/RW
PSU: Thermaltake 1200W
OS: Vista x64 SP1
Bookmarks