Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: TEAM Xtreem Dark + Asus Commando : quick test

  1. #1
    Champion
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    lab501.ro
    Posts
    1,072

    TEAM Xtreem Dark + Asus Commando : quick test

    TEAM's "Xtreem Dark" series comes as an cheaper alternative for the high-performance regular "Xtreem" models. It is more geared towards gamers and entry-level overclockers, as they offer fast ratings at a very good price. Here are the main technical specs that define the TEAM Xtreem Dark line:

    - ProMOS chips;
    - blue heatspreaders;
    - working voltage 2.0-2.2V
    - ultra-low noise 8-layer PCB.

    There are two speed ratings, DDR667 3-4-4-8 and DDR800 4-4-4-12, and both come in 2X512MB and 2X1024MB kits. The most special thing about them is the ultra-low noise 8-layer PCB, most of the DDR2 on the market using regular 6-layer PCB that seems to affect the maximum clocks.

    The testing setup was as follows:

    Intel E6600
    Asus Commando
    TEAM TXDD2048M800HC4DC-D
    Tagan U25 700W
    ATI X300, WD 1600JS, etc


  2. #2
    Champion
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    lab501.ro
    Posts
    1,072
    But before i'll show the results, a few words about the Asus Commando. The board is a good clocker, a bit better than the P5B Deluxe, and it's more smooth; very nice bundle and gimmicks (i love the power/reset/clear CMOS lighted switches) but the debug LCD is show-off only, with no practical use. The Vcore voltage, even if it comes from a digital PWM, is unstable and the expected Asus-style Vdroop could not miss the party: 1.50V set in BIOS produces ~1.487V in idle and ~1.460V with both cores loaded. And that is with a 3.6Ghz Conroe, wonder what will happen with Kentsfield on phasechange .
    But, the thing that worries me the most is too much Vdimm available straight from BIOS settings, with no warning. 3.375V will kill any DDR2 in under half of hour, this board is a damn RAM exterminator in the wrong hands. Who knows how to use 3.375V for DDR2 definetely knows how to voltmod.

  3. #3
    Champion
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    lab501.ro
    Posts
    1,072
    Anyway, back to testing now, i have tested the DDR800 4-4-4 model, code TXDD2048M800HC4DC-D. I thought i should try tight timings first, where normally Micron D9GMH shines, and see if the ProMOS chips could even come close. Surprize

    2.20V 3-3-3-8 380Mhz OK
    2.35V 3-3-3-8 400Mhz OK



    DDR800 3-3-3 with 2.35V is excellent for ProMOS, especially for the price. They've basically matched the default ratings of TXDD2048M800HC3DC wich costs two times as much.




    Further, testing the default 4-4-4 timings wich we all know 965 loves so much. Good clocking, again:

    2.20V 4-4-4-12 480Mhz OK
    2.35V 4-4-4-12 500Mhz OK






    And finally, playing a little with relaxed timings ... sadly, as the timings get sloppy and the frequency increases, voltage response decreases, at 5-5-5 2.35V didn't help at all.

    2.2V 5-5-5-15 530Mhz OK



    Overall i think they're a good choice, considering they're ~15% cheaper than the Micron equivalent and they match very well with the 965. Enjoy !

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    247
    nice test man... did you tried over 2.35v? Cause I found some promos chip that gets better till 2.6v but others that with more then 2.4v gets worse..

    Marco
    XtremeHardware.it
    Asrock Italian Official Support Forum, Enermax and Sapphire Support Forum

  5. #5
    Champion
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Bangkok, Thailand
    Posts
    1,375
    Nice result for promos chip, it good speed for not D9 chip
    Sorry For My English
    OverclockZone Team
    THAILAND

  6. #6
    Champion
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    lab501.ro
    Posts
    1,072
    Principino1984> I guess it's luck of the draw, more than 2.35V on this kit made it clock worse.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cairo
    Posts
    2,366
    Looks very good for the price , thanks for sharing
    Intel Core I7 920 @ 3.8GHZ 1.28V (Core Contact Freezer)
    Asus X58 P6T
    6GB OCZ Gold DDR3-1600MHZ 8-8-8-24
    XFX HD5870
    WD 1TB Black HD
    Corsair 850TX
    Cooler Master HAF 922

  8. #8
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    italy
    Posts
    781
    Quote Originally Posted by principino1984
    nice test man... did you tried over 2.35v? Cause I found some promos chip that gets better till 2.6v but others that with more then 2.4v gets worse..

    Marco
    Nice Marco

  9. #9
    Champion
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cape Town, South Africa
    Posts
    128
    Thanks for the share they look good. Do the IC's get hotter than micron at same volts?
    hardware flux

  10. #10
    Love and Peace!
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    hiding somewhere!
    Posts
    3,675
    seems to be around the same temp? i use a pretty high cfm fan for cooling, so it's hard to really tell.


    Micutzu, i hope you don't mind me posting some of my results here

    Quote Originally Posted by principino1984
    nice test man... did you tried over 2.35v? Cause I found some promos chip that gets better till 2.6v but others that with more then 2.4v gets worse..
    i've been testing the DDR2-667 version of this kit.. past 2.29v on my DFI, there are hadly any gains.. though it does scale up like 1mhz per .1v until 2.6v.. i didn't go any higher




    with my dfi nf590 sli m2r/g, max 32m stable at various voltages and timings:



    and with a (rather crappy) P5WD2:



    i couldn't get any higher mhz with looser timings, but i am not sure if this would be the case if i had a 965x based mobo.
    Got a fan over those memory sticks? No? Well get to it before you kill them

  11. #11
    Champion
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    lab501.ro
    Posts
    1,072
    I don't mind ozzimark . The 667's are a bit lower bin, you might not get as high as the 800's.

    Quote Originally Posted by TraX
    Thanks for the share they look good. Do the IC's get hotter than micron at same volts?
    ProMOS are cooler than Micron from what my finger is telling me.

  12. #12
    Love and Peace!
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    hiding somewhere!
    Posts
    3,675
    Quote Originally Posted by Micutzu
    The 667's are a bit lower bin, you might not get as high as the 800's.
    yes, considering the difference in price, i definitely advise getting the ddr2-800 over the 667.
    Got a fan over those memory sticks? No? Well get to it before you kill them

  13. #13
    Champion
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cape Town, South Africa
    Posts
    128
    Thanks
    hardware flux

  14. #14
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    247
    Quote Originally Posted by Micutzu
    Principino1984> I guess it's luck of the draw, more than 2.35V on this kit made it clock worse.
    ok! thanks man!

    Marco
    XtremeHardware.it
    Asrock Italian Official Support Forum, Enermax and Sapphire Support Forum

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Denmark, Copenhagen
    Posts
    66
    Looks great, nice testing - very professional.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •