MMM
Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Possible Theory for Penryn's 3 MB/6 MB Cache?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    532
    i thought penryn is going to have 2*6mb of cache?
    otherwise it would be a bad move from intel, because less cache prevents the cpu from scaling well, doesn't it?
    and if they want good yields they can still make a 2*3mb version for the low end.
    source
    Quote Originally Posted by freecableguy
    the idiots out number us 10,000:1

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    279
    Penryn is believed to be the dual core replacement for Conroe, so that would be 6MB shared L2 cache as opposed to 4MB at present.
    The interesting bit will be if Kentsfields replacement (Yorkfield?) will be a single die or a dual die implementation as at present, and if its a single die if its 2 x 6MB with each 6MB shared between two cores, or 12MB shared between all 4.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •